Jump to content

AiMesh Do Not Work

saltcute

Recently I bought a few AX56U_V2 (AX55) and connect them to some AC68Ws in AiMesh mode. The setup process was completely normal with no problems. But few hours later I suddenly disconnect to my Apex Legend match (lol), finding only one of the AC68Ws is still in "AiMesh" while the rest are in "Client List". Those routers in "Client List" does not provide WiFi and their wired network disconnect occasionally. 

When I visited the management page of each AiMesh Node, it shows "Unable to connect to the Parent AP". I never met this problem before when I have only 3 AC68Ws.

All of the routers have latest firmware, 3.0.0.4.386_42844-g63620cd for AX56U_V2 and 3.0.0.4.386_43129-g60defb2 for AC68W.

BTW AX56U_V2s are Chinese version and I believe the AC68Ws are US version.

Please help 😭

 

AkdQryZEaA5YfLnC.png
a9rn8JH043uGL5fb.png
qr8ODoA6sGZ4tfWq.png
rLnyk6M8BXBiD4fO.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Seems they might just be too far from the main router and not have enough signal?

F@H
Desktop: i9-13900K, ASUS Z790-E, 64GB DDR5-6000 CL36, RTX3080, 2TB MP600 Pro XT, 2TB SX8200Pro, 2x16TB Ironwolf RAID0, Corsair HX1200, Antec Vortex 360 AIO, Thermaltake Versa H25 TG, Samsung 4K curved 49" TV, 23" secondary, Mountain Everest Max

Mobile SFF rig: i9-9900K, Noctua NH-L9i, Asrock Z390 Phantom ITX-AC, 32GB, GTX1070, 2x1TB SX8200Pro RAID0, 2x5TB 2.5" HDD RAID0, Athena 500W Flex (Noctua fan), Custom 4.7l 3D printed case

 

Asus Zenbook UM325UA, Ryzen 7 5700u, 16GB, 1TB, OLED

 

GPD Win 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Kilrah said:

Seems they might just be too far from the main router and not have enough signal?

But all of the nodes are connected to the router with wire and iirc, disconnected nodes will show in the "Topology" section with gray line connected to the router rather than in "Clients" section

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't have first hand experience with Asus's thing, but all other "mesh" things from consumer manufacturers I tried requried direct wireless connection between all devices, they don't do it through cable. 

To have multiple roaming APs through cable a dedicated system like those from ubiquiti is needed.

F@H
Desktop: i9-13900K, ASUS Z790-E, 64GB DDR5-6000 CL36, RTX3080, 2TB MP600 Pro XT, 2TB SX8200Pro, 2x16TB Ironwolf RAID0, Corsair HX1200, Antec Vortex 360 AIO, Thermaltake Versa H25 TG, Samsung 4K curved 49" TV, 23" secondary, Mountain Everest Max

Mobile SFF rig: i9-9900K, Noctua NH-L9i, Asrock Z390 Phantom ITX-AC, 32GB, GTX1070, 2x1TB SX8200Pro RAID0, 2x5TB 2.5" HDD RAID0, Athena 500W Flex (Noctua fan), Custom 4.7l 3D printed case

 

Asus Zenbook UM325UA, Ryzen 7 5700u, 16GB, 1TB, OLED

 

GPD Win 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, potatopotat0 said:

But all of the nodes are connected to the router with wire and iirc, disconnected nodes will show in the "Topology" section with gray line connected to the router rather than in "Clients" section

Then why use AiMesh if you have ethernet directly linking the units? The primary router can run in its default router mode while the other units can be run in AP mode.

 

You'll need to configure them properly for this to work right, though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Falcon1986 said:

Then why use AiMesh if you have ethernet directly linking the units?

Typically these things only support single SSID/proper roaming when oeperated in mesh mode, if you do it how you say you end up with the usual mess.

F@H
Desktop: i9-13900K, ASUS Z790-E, 64GB DDR5-6000 CL36, RTX3080, 2TB MP600 Pro XT, 2TB SX8200Pro, 2x16TB Ironwolf RAID0, Corsair HX1200, Antec Vortex 360 AIO, Thermaltake Versa H25 TG, Samsung 4K curved 49" TV, 23" secondary, Mountain Everest Max

Mobile SFF rig: i9-9900K, Noctua NH-L9i, Asrock Z390 Phantom ITX-AC, 32GB, GTX1070, 2x1TB SX8200Pro RAID0, 2x5TB 2.5" HDD RAID0, Athena 500W Flex (Noctua fan), Custom 4.7l 3D printed case

 

Asus Zenbook UM325UA, Ryzen 7 5700u, 16GB, 1TB, OLED

 

GPD Win 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Kilrah said:

Typically these things only support single SSID/proper roaming when oeperated in mesh mode, if you do it how you say you end up with the usual mess.

Not necessarily. It's the same concept behind using APs with a direct uplink to a central router/switch, which was the old way of simulating what mesh and more advanced systems do.

 

Single SSID is fine. Using different non-overlapping channels is important. Reducing power output so that the wireless radius of each unit just barely overlaps will take some tuning and prevents clients from "sticking" to a certain AP while moving through different wireless zones.

 

Since there is no central controller there won't necessarily be seamless roaming, but you can get pretty close following the concepts above given the investment in current hardware. At the end of the day, the wireless client will still make the decision as to which AP to connect to.

 

@potatopotat0Is seamless roaming something you absolutely need? Thought you just wanted this to work for a PC playing games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Falcon1986 said:

@potatopotat0Is seamless roaming something you absolutely need? Thought you just wanted this to work for a PC playing games.

it is best to. cuz I can totally run a ethernet cable directly to my PC if I only want the wired connection work since there have already be ethernet ports for my AiMesh nodes

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, potatopotat0 said:

it is best to. cuz I can totally run a ethernet cable directly to my PC if I only want the wired connection work since there have already be ethernet ports for my AiMesh nodes

Did you link the mesh nodes from their WAN port to the primary router’s LAN port?

 

Is each node getting its own LAN IP? Dynamically? If so, I’d suggest you assign it a static IP.

 

A sketch of your network layout might be useful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I found two of my AC56U_V2s' firmware wasn't up to date because I accidentally upgrade their firmware with a AC56U's (without V2), for sure it didn't work. And then I update those AC56U_V2 to the latest firmware and it worked for a week. I thought it was the problem, but just now my internet disconnected and all of my AiMesh nodes disappered, so do the clients. 

bruh

qCL1L7H3J9t2WvBh.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Been trying to live with AIMesh for close to a year and it's constantly been a nightmare. Firmware updates have definitely helped, and IMHO has been the most important step for resolving issues, but they still continue to rack up. I stumbled across this thread trying to find answers to why suddenly no clients will connect to my node despite it being wayyyy closer in physical distance and having a "Great" connection per the web UI. I think where my problems originate from is that I'm using different models of router. I had an AC68U and upgraded to an AX58U. They support meshing together, but the web makes it sound like despite being possible it's not recommended. I might just bite the bullet and buy a second AX58U and scrap the AC68U.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×