my pc is just awful

[cchapss_]

so i get barely any fps, ranging from 20-40

 

i have
GTX 1080

RYZEN 5 1600

16GB DDR4 3200

 

i ran a userbenchmark test and my ssd was poor, and my cpu was having a bigger load than it should, with nothing running

recently ive been play alot of rust (1100 hours) and i used to average around 100 without streaming, and around 70 with streaming, but no im currently struggling to get past 50 without streaming and on servers with barely anyone on

 

any help?

 

 

**tweeted linus asking for a new pc but he hasnt replied lol

 

[Helpful Tech Witch]

1 never use userbenchmark. They are so biased towards Intel CPUs. They said a 5900x is slower than a 9900k (not kidding)

2 could you run a 3d mark and a cknebench run to see if the CPU is actually being wieid

3 what are the full specs

[Chris Pratt]

That's really not a bad system honestly. The CPU is a little long in the tooth, but a 1080 is a very respectable card, even today, and there's people building new rigs today with 16GB of 3200Mhz RAM. Nothing at all wrong with that.

 

Not sure what's hurting your performance, but your components are still pretty decent spec-wise.

[BondiBlue]

Is there anything that's messed up with your Windows installation? Perhaps misconfigured drivers? I'd recommend trying a clean installation of Windows if you have the time. 

17 minutes ago, cchapss_ said:

**tweeted linus asking for a new pc but he hasnt replied lol

Not sure what that would do for you. He doesn't give out computers like that.

[cchapss_]

9 minutes ago, HelpfulTechWizard said:

1 never use userbenchmark. They are so biased towards Intel CPUs. They said a 5900x is slower than a 9900k (not kidding)

2 could you run a 3d mark and a cknebench run to see if the CPU is actually being wieid

3 what are the full specs

FULL SPECS : 

CPU: Ryzen 5 1600

MOBO: B450M DS3H

RAM: Corsair Vengeance 16gb DDR4

GPU: GTX 1080 8gb GIGABYTE

PSU: 750W Thermaltake RGB

Case: AeroCool

Storage: SSD 240gb HDD 1TB

[cchapss_]

1 minute ago, BondiBlue said:

Is there anything that's messed up with your Windows installation? Perhaps misconfigured drivers? I'd recommend trying a clean installation of Windows if you have the time. 

Not sure what that would do for you. He doesn't give out computers like that.

ye i know, i just have this thing on twitter tweeting people for things, nzxt replied lol

[Mark Kaine]

14 minutes ago, HelpfulTechWizard said:

never use userbenchmark

Part of the problem is there aren't any similar "benchmarks" and the idea is actually good,  why not check components while testing and tell users what could actually be problems...?

 

3DMark says it does it, but doesn't, at least not in the free version. 

 

occt says it does,  but doesn't.  I let it run one hour it didn't even give me a "looking good" or anything.  So as long there's no alternative to ub people will probably keep using it.

 

Hey, it actually found two bad hard drives for me,  although that could after all be motherboard issues too, but fact is since I removed those "underperforming" hard drives my pc runs a lot more smoothly. 

 

And yes I know they're intel shills, its kinda hilarious  

[Helpful Tech Witch]

3 minutes ago, cchapss_ said:

Corsair Vengeance 16gb DDR4

Is this in dual channel?

If you aren’t 110% sure take a picture of the ram slots.

[cchapss_]

1 minute ago, HelpfulTechWizard said:

Is this in dual channel?

If you aren’t 110% sure take a picture of the ram slots.

i have 4 ram slots, 2x8 gb sticks, theyre in the 2nd and 4th slots

[cchapss_]

16 minutes ago, HelpfulTechWizard said:

1 never use userbenchmark. They are so biased towards Intel CPUs. They said a 5900x is slower than a 9900k (not kidding)

2 could you run a 3d mark and a cknebench run to see if the CPU is actually being wieid

3 what are the full specs

my benchmark for cinebench

[Helpful Tech Witch]

1 minute ago, Mark Kaine said:

of the problem is there aren't any similar "benchmarks" and the idea is actually good,  why not check components while testing and tell users what could actually be problems...?

Idea, yeah. But only if you count multi core for more than 2% of the score.

1 minute ago, Mark Kaine said:

Hey, it actually found two bad hard drives for me,  although that could after all be motherboard issues too, but fact is since I removed those "underperforming" hard drives my pc runs a lot more smoothly. 

I feel like that should be something you check for with crystal disk/some other program that can acces smart info.

2 minutes ago, Mark Kaine said:

And yes I know they're intel shills, its kinda hilarious

This is so true. The ryzen 3000 and onward descriptions are just flat out lying. Befor that they were pretty accurate. Not they just go on and on about "marketing" and that's it's not actually as good as it seems.

 

4 minutes ago, Mark Kaine said:

DMark says it does it, but doesn't, at least not in the free version

You can still go online and see the scores other people get with the same hardware.
 

 

Maybe sometime someone should make a website. But it would have to get used more than userbenchmark to make it the no. One option on Google search.

[Helpful Tech Witch]

2 minutes ago, cchapss_ said:

my benchmark for cinebench

Is this the 12nm or the 14nm r5 1600?

[cchapss_]

1 minute ago, HelpfulTechWizard said:

Is this the 12nm or the 14nm r5 1600?

12nm

[cchapss_]

6 minutes ago, HelpfulTechWizard said:

Is this in dual channel?

If you aren’t 110% sure take a picture of the ram slots.

and also when i play rust mostly my ram hists like 90% usage, its using around 14gb

[Helpful Tech Witch]

5 minutes ago, cchapss_ said:

12nm

Then that cb is way too low.
The 1600af is nearly 1000 points higher usually.
 

What are CPU temps like?

[cchapss_]

1 minute ago, HelpfulTechWizard said:

Then that cb is way too low.
The 1600af is nearly 1000 points higher usually.
 

What are CPU temps like?

[Helpful Tech Witch]

1 minute ago, cchapss_ said:

That's when idle. It's not going to help.
What are they like under load (take a screen shot when cknebench is running of coretemp)?

[cchapss_]

1 minute ago, HelpfulTechWizard said:

That's when idle. It's not going to help.
What are they like under load (take a screen shot when cknebench is running of coretemp)?

sorry

[Helpful Tech Witch]

1 minute ago, cchapss_ said:

sorry

Could you take it a bit aftet the begining of the run? If you take it at the begining its not a good representation, as it takes some time to heat.

Ideally you take a picture at about half done.

[cchapss_]

1 minute ago, HelpfulTechWizard said:

Could you take it a bit aftet the begining of the run? If you take it at the begining its not a good representation, as it takes some time to heat.

Ideally you take a picture at about half done.

 

[Helpful Tech Witch]

7 minutes ago, cchapss_ said:

 

Hm..... what cooler do you have?

[cchapss_]

2 minutes ago, HelpfulTechWizard said:

Hm..... what cooler do you have?

Cooler Master EVO 212 Black

 

[Helpful Tech Witch]

4 minutes ago, cchapss_ said:

Cooler Master EVO 212 Black

 

Those are really low temps.

what temps do you get with prime95 running?

[cchapss_]

1 minute ago, HelpfulTechWizard said:

Those are really low temps.

what temps do you get with prime95 running?

whats prime95?

 

[Husky]

3 hours ago, cchapss_ said:

whats prime95?

 

Prime95 is a Prime number calculator used for research to find new Prime numbers.

It is also frequently used as a stress-testing tool as it puts an immensely strong load on the CPU and at least for me, it gets my CPU the hottest out of all the stress tests so I prefer it.

 

Please run Prime95 as @HelpfulTechWizard said, he also noted that the temps you were getting under Cinebench were unusually low which I agree with. You can run it for about 20 minutes or so and then take a screenshot of the temperature WHILE Prime95 is still running (don't stop the test to take the screenshot, you can stop it after you send the screenshot).