Jump to content

Snology NAS

Quinntun

Good day, Im thinking of buying three identical synology nas for a project I'm doing. Two are going to be at home directly link together for fail-over mode and a third offsite being mirrored (so essentially all three going to be a backup of each other).

 

I cant decide if i should run in RAID 5 so i still can sustain a drive failure ( so essentially i need to lose two nas and 2 drives before any data lose occur) or just setup it up in raid 0 for maximum storage (where i would need to lose just 2 nas and 1 drive to lose data).

 

Any thoughts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

First, it depends on how much you want to spend and how imortant the file is. You have THREE NAS DRIVE having same files, so I think it is pretty fine to set up RAID 0 on two drive and have RAID 5 on the third drive(the offsite one).

By the way, you have one more choice which is SHR (which just let the machine decide which is the best for you). 

If you want to calulate the stoge sizes between different RAID mode and SHR mode, go to 

https://www.synology.com/en-global/support/RAID_calculator

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

My data is on 3 RAID0 sets one of them being offsite and I'm happy with that.

F@H
Desktop: i9-13900K, ASUS Z790-E, 64GB DDR5-6000 CL36, RTX3080, 2TB MP600 Pro XT, 2TB SX8200Pro, 2x16TB Ironwolf RAID0, Corsair HX1200, Antec Vortex 360 AIO, Thermaltake Versa H25 TG, Samsung 4K curved 49" TV, 23" secondary, Mountain Everest Max

Mobile SFF rig: i9-9900K, Noctua NH-L9i, Asrock Z390 Phantom ITX-AC, 32GB, GTX1070, 2x1TB SX8200Pro RAID0, 2x5TB 2.5" HDD RAID0, Athena 500W Flex (Noctua fan), Custom 4.7l 3D printed case

 

Asus Zenbook UM325UA, Ryzen 7 5700u, 16GB, 1TB, OLED

 

GPD Win 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok thanks, Ya i've been thinking since i have the three nas if the raid5 would have been a bit of an overkill

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dont forget one mayor thing. Replication does not protect from data corruption. So... if you have (lets call primary NAS R1) R1 in RAID 0, if you loss disk, and in doing so you get data corruption (opened file, files in transition and similar) that data corruption will be replicated to all other NASs.

 

My recommendation is to have RAID5 or raid 1/0 on primary and then have RAID 0 on second NAS where you can use extra space for multiply copies or versioning (snapshots) and then again raid 5 on last NAS for long term security of data.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
On 11/24/2020 at 3:39 PM, Marko Rogulja said:

Dont forget one mayor thing. Replication does not protect from data corruption. So... if you have (lets call primary NAS R1) R1 in RAID 0, if you loss disk, and in doing so you get data corruption (opened file, files in transition and similar) that data corruption will be replicated to all other NASs.

 

My recommendation is to have RAID5 or raid 1/0 on primary and then have RAID 0 on second NAS where you can use extra space for multiply copies or versioning (snapshots) and then again raid 5 on last NAS for long term security of data.

 

 

Thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×