Jump to content

SSD Size Practicality

octester
Go to solution Solved by Kilrah,

No such thing. 

Is there ever a point where the size of an SSD makes it as slow or slower than a HDD? Like say 20TB of storage completely filled up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

SSD are instantanious unlike spinning platters and pickup needles of HDD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Depends on the SSD type, not on the size.

F@H
Desktop: i9-13900K, ASUS Z790-E, 64GB DDR5-6000 CL36, RTX3080, 2TB MP600 Pro XT, 2TB SX8200Pro, 2x16TB Ironwolf RAID0, Corsair HX1200, Antec Vortex 360 AIO, Thermaltake Versa H25 TG, Samsung 4K curved 49" TV, 23" secondary, Mountain Everest Max

Mobile SFF rig: i9-9900K, Noctua NH-L9i, Asrock Z390 Phantom ITX-AC, 32GB, GTX1070, 2x1TB SX8200Pro RAID0, 2x5TB 2.5" HDD RAID0, Athena 500W Flex (Noctua fan), Custom 4.7l 3D printed case

 

Asus Zenbook UM325UA, Ryzen 7 5700u, 16GB, 1TB, OLED

 

GPD Win 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was thinking that theoretically it would eventually hit a point where windows was the limit, and it just couldn't read fast enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

No such thing. 

F@H
Desktop: i9-13900K, ASUS Z790-E, 64GB DDR5-6000 CL36, RTX3080, 2TB MP600 Pro XT, 2TB SX8200Pro, 2x16TB Ironwolf RAID0, Corsair HX1200, Antec Vortex 360 AIO, Thermaltake Versa H25 TG, Samsung 4K curved 49" TV, 23" secondary, Mountain Everest Max

Mobile SFF rig: i9-9900K, Noctua NH-L9i, Asrock Z390 Phantom ITX-AC, 32GB, GTX1070, 2x1TB SX8200Pro RAID0, 2x5TB 2.5" HDD RAID0, Athena 500W Flex (Noctua fan), Custom 4.7l 3D printed case

 

Asus Zenbook UM325UA, Ryzen 7 5700u, 16GB, 1TB, OLED

 

GPD Win 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Orange1 said:

SSD are NOT instantanious unlike spinning platters and pickup needles of HDD

They are limited by their data transfer buses, e.g. SATA, NVMe, etc.

The following is according to Linus:

SRAM is the fastest storage we have invented, with a latency of 1x

DRAM is 10x.

Optane is 100x.

NAND is 1000x.

The rest is variable.

 

If it's not true, blame Linus' first video on Optane. 

elephants

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, ragnarok0273 said:

They are limited by their data transfer buses, e.g. SATA, NVMe, etc.

The following is according to Linus:

SRAM is the fastest storage we have invented, with a latency of 1x

DRAM is 10x.

Optane is 100x.

NAND is 1000x.

The rest is variable.

 

If it's not true, blame Linus' first video on Optane. 

Well its true enough to not be incorrect. But theres way more to it then that.
And things change (a lot) over time.

When i ask for more specs, don't expect me to know the answer!
I'm just helping YOU to help YOURSELF!
(The more info you give the easier it is for others to help you out!)

Not willing to capitulate to the ignorance of the masses!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×