fps Remove CPU limitation on CS:GO

[Skalw0]

Hello there,

I have an intel core i7-9700k processor and RTX 2080 Super.

I play 1440x1080 stretched all graphic settings on high (same values even with lowest settings), my game uses at most 50% of the CPU, and i get stuck at 350 fps max, average being 312.

Any advice how to remove that limit, and no my fps are not limited by a console or any command 

[Theguywhobea]

what 350 fps isn't enough?

[Crunchy Dragon]

Is it even possible for CS:GO to use 100% of any modern Core i5 or higher CPU?

[bellabichon]

An average of 312 fps is a lot more than you're going to need, with current monitors refreshing at a maximum of 240hz. Any particular reason why you want to get your fps higher?

[SupaKomputa]

50% of the cpu meaning the GPU is the bottleneck, i say pretty much max out.

[Mateyyy]

CS:GO most likely can't even fully utilise 8 cores as it's based on such an old engine, so single-core performance is king.

Regardless of that though, I highly doubt you'd notice any actual improvement from an even higher framerate. Stable 300-350FPS should be plenty for CS.

[Skalw0]

it is enough, but i just see al these people saying they have 700, or tarik back in the day having 700fps while streaming and im over here with 300

[Mateyyy]

6 minutes ago, Skalw0 said:

it is enough, but i just see al these people saying they have 700, or tarik back in the day having 700fps while streaming and im over here with 300

Pre-2015 I used to easily get over 400 with just an i5-4670K, after that they've made some changes to the game that lead to me and many people's framerates to be cut in half basically. Now, depending on the map, I can get 350-500FPS (ex. Mirage) or 150-350FPS (ex. new Cache) with a 9900K. 

Also, "all these people" could just be bullshitting?

[Skalw0]

Just now, Mateyyy said:

Pre-2015 I used to easily get over 400 with just an i5-4670K, after that they've made some changes to the game that lead to my and many people's framerates to be cut in half basically. Now, depending on the map, I can get 350-500FPS (ex. Mirage) or 150-350FPS (ex. new Cache) with a 9900K. 

Also, "all these people" could just be bullshitting?

was mostly refering to streamers back in the day.

 

So you sayin basically, valve sucks, boycott to get atleast source 2?

 

[steelo]

22 minutes ago, Skalw0 said:

Hello there,

I have an intel core i7-9700k processor and RTX 2080 Super.

I play 1440x1080 stretched all graphic settings on high (same values even with lowest settings), my game uses at most 50% of the CPU, and i get stuck at 350 fps max, average being 312.

Any advice how to remove that limit, and no my fps are not limited by a console or any command 

"Stuck at 350 fps"

 

I wish I had your kind of problems...

[Skalw0]

1 minute ago, steelo said:

"Stuck at 350 fps"

 

I wish I had your kind of problems...

don't worry, I was at that "please let me have atleast 120fps" poin few months ago

[Mateyyy]

6 minutes ago, Skalw0 said:

was mostly refering to streamers back in the day.

 

So you sayin basically, valve sucks, boycott to get atleast source 2?

 

Not saying they suck, they're doing probably the best they can with a 15 year old engine.

Going to Source 2 would be nice, but if that results in higher system requirements, or in other words less people being able to run the game, then I don't see Valve doing this for a while. The one upside for the game running on Source is that it can run on pretty much anything, and more players = more $$$.