Jump to content

Upgrade to Xeon

So now I have the i7 2600

I want to ask you if I buy the e5 1650 and oc it to 4 GHz or the e5 2560 v2 it will be better for Fps with my 1060 gb or it's better to buy ryzen 5 1600 and oc it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Michisha96 said:

So now I have the i7 2600

I want to ask you if I buy the e5 1650 and oc it to 4 GHz or the e5 2560 v2 it will be better for Fps with my 1060 gb or it's better to buy ryzen 5 1600 and oc it

Does your motherboard support Xeons?

NOTE: I no longer frequent this site. If you really need help, PM/DM me and my e.mail will alert me. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Radium_Angel said:

Does your motherboard support Xeons?

Nope

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Michisha96 said:

Nope

So you'll need a whole new setup.

At that point you'll need to see if the board you intend on buying will support OCing of Xeons, not all Xeons take kindly to that.

NOTE: I no longer frequent this site. If you really need help, PM/DM me and my e.mail will alert me. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Radium_Angel said:

So you'll need a whole new setup.

At that point you'll need to see if the board you intend on buying will support OCing of Xeons, not all Xeons take kindly to that.

The question is will the e5 1650 oc to 3.5~4gh be more powerful then ryzen 5 1600 oc . And is a lga2011 motherboard is future profe ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Michisha96 said:

The question is will the e5 1650 oc to 3.5~4gh be more powerful then ryzen 5 1600 oc . And is a lga2011 motherboard is future profe ?

As much of a fan of Xeons that I am, the CPU was discontinued in 2015...The ryzen is newer and faster and you'll have a better upgrade path going ryzen

NOTE: I no longer frequent this site. If you really need help, PM/DM me and my e.mail will alert me. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Xeon's were designed as workstations. A lot of them do perform great when gaming however, they will never perform as good as an i5, i7 or Ryzen when it comes to today's gaming titles. I would only recommend a Xeon if you could find a cheap one to throw into your current motherboard.

Intel Core i7 9700F / Cooler Master 212 Evo / GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER / 16 GB G.SKILL RAM @ 2666MHz / GA-B365M-DS3H / EVGA 500w PSU

HP Pavilion Gaming 15 / Ryzen 5 4600H / GeForce GTX 1050 / 8 GB @ 3200MHz

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Brent744 said:

Xeon's were designed as workstations. A lot of them do perform great when gaming however, they will never perform as good as an i5, i7 or Ryzen when it comes to today's gaming titles. I would only recommend a Xeon if you could find a cheap one to throw into your current motherboard.

Xeon can be just as good as an i5, i7 or Ryzen for gaming.

Many Xeon's are based on i7's, for example that E5-1650 is the same as an i7-3930K and it will perform exactly the same.

Intel Core i9-10900X, Asus TUF X299 Mark 1, 64GB DDR4 3200MHz, Asus GTX 1080 Strix, 2TB 970 EVO Plus, 2TB SN570, 8TB HDD, DC Assassin III, Meshify 2

Old PC: Intel Xeon X5670 6c/12t @ 4.40GHz, Asus P6X58D-E, 24GB DDR3 1600MHz, Asus GTX 1080 Strix, 500GB, 250GB & 120GB SSD, 2x 4TB & 2x 2TB HDD, Fractal Define R5

PC 2: Intel Xeon E5-2690 8c/16t @ 3.3-3.8GHz, ThinkStation S30 (C602/X79), 64GB (4x 16GB) DDR3 1600MHz, Asus GeForce GTX 960 Turbo OC, 1TB Crucial MX500

PC 3: Intel Core i7-3770 4c/8t @ 4.22-4.43GHz, Asus P8Z77-V LK, 16GB DDR3 1648MHz, Asus RX 470 Strix, 1TB & 250GB Crucial MX500 and 3x 500GB HDD

Laptop: ThinkPad T440p, Intel Core i7-4800MQ 4c/8t @ 2.7-3.7GHz, 16GB DDR3 1600MHz, GeForce GT 730M (GPU: 1006MHz MEM: 1151MHz), 2TB SSD, 14" 1080p IPS, 100Wh battery

Laptop 2: ThinkPad T450, Intel Core i7-5600U 2c/4t @ 2.6-3.2GHz, 16GB DDR3 1600MHz, Intel HD 5500, 250GB SSD, 14" 900p TN, 24Wh + 72Wh batteries

Phone: Huawei Honor 9 64GB + 256GB card Watch: Motorola Moto 360 1st Gen.

General X58 Xeon/i7 discussion

Some other PC's:

Spoiler

Some of the specs of these systems might not be up to date

PC 4: Intel Xeon X5675 6c/12t @ 3.07-3.47GHz, HP 0B4Ch (X58), 12GB DDR3 1333MHz, Asus GeForce GTX 660 DC2, 240GB & 120GB SSD, 1TB HDD

PC 5: Intel Xeon W3550 @ 3.07GHz, HP (X58), 8GB DDR3, NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 (GPU: 1050MHz MEM: 1250MHz), 120GB SSD, 2TB, 1TB and 500GB HDD

PC 6: Intel Core2 Quad Q9550 @ 3.8GHz, Asus P5KC, 8GB DDR2, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470, 120GB SSD and 500GB HDD

HTPC: Intel Core2 Quad Q6600 @ 3.0GHz, HP DC7900SFF, 8GB DDR2 800MHz, Asus Radeon HD 6570, 240GB SSD and 3TB HDD

WinXP PC: Intel Core2 Duo E6300 @ 2.33GHz, Asus P5B, 2GB DDR2 667MHz, NVIDIA GeForce 8500 GT, 32GB SSD and 80GB HDD

RetroPC: Intel Pentium 4 HT @ 3.0GHz, Gigabyte GA-8SGXLFS, 2gb DDR1, ATi Radeon 9800 Pro, 2x 40gb HDD

My first PC: Intel Celeron 333MHz, Diamond Micronics C400, 384mb RAM, Diamond Viper V550 (NVIDIA Riva TNT), 6gb and 8gb HDD

Server: 2x Intel Xeon E5420, Dell PowerEdge 2950, 32gb DDR2, ATI ES1000, 4x 146gb SAS

Dual Opteron PC: 2x 6-core AMD Opteron 2419EE, HP XW9400, 32GB DDR2, ATI Radeon 3650, 500gb HDD

Core2 Duo PC: Intel Core2 Duo E8400, HP DC7800, 4gb DDR2, NVIDIA Quadro FX1700, 1tb and 80gb HDD

Athlon XP PC: AMD Athlon XP 2400+, MSI something, 1,5gb DDR1, ATI Radeon 9200, 40gb HDD

Thinkpad: Intel Core2 Duo T7200, Lenovo Thinkpad T60, 4gb DDR2, ATI Mobility Radeon X1400, 1tb HDD

Pentium 3 PC: Intel Pentium 3 866MHz, Asus CUSL2-C, 512mb RAM, 3DFX VooDoo 3 2000 AGP

Laptop: Dell Latitude E6430, Intel Core i5-3210M, 6gb DDR3 1600MHz , Intel HD 4000, 250gb Samsung SSD 860 EVO, 1TB WD Blue HDD

Laptop: Latitude 3380, Intel Pentium Gold 4415U 2c/4t @ 2.3GHz, 8GB DDR4, Intel HD 610, 120GB SSD, 13.3" 768p TN, 56Wh battery

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Pasi123 said:

Xeon can be just as good as an i5, i7 or Ryzen for gaming.

Many Xeon's are based on i7's, for example that E5-1650 is the same as an i7-3930K and it will perform exactly the same.

But the e5-1650 or e5-2690v2 will be better then the ryzen 5 1600/2600 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Michisha96 said:

But the e5-1650 or e5-2690v2 will be better then the ryzen 5 1600/2600 

That depends on the price.

Ryzen 5 1600 or 2600 is a bit faster than the E5-1650 even when it's overclocked to over 4GHz. E5-2690v2 is faster than the Ryzen 5's on multi-core because it has more cores but for gaming it probably isn't as good as the Ryzen's because the single-core performance is lower.

Intel Core i9-10900X, Asus TUF X299 Mark 1, 64GB DDR4 3200MHz, Asus GTX 1080 Strix, 2TB 970 EVO Plus, 2TB SN570, 8TB HDD, DC Assassin III, Meshify 2

Old PC: Intel Xeon X5670 6c/12t @ 4.40GHz, Asus P6X58D-E, 24GB DDR3 1600MHz, Asus GTX 1080 Strix, 500GB, 250GB & 120GB SSD, 2x 4TB & 2x 2TB HDD, Fractal Define R5

PC 2: Intel Xeon E5-2690 8c/16t @ 3.3-3.8GHz, ThinkStation S30 (C602/X79), 64GB (4x 16GB) DDR3 1600MHz, Asus GeForce GTX 960 Turbo OC, 1TB Crucial MX500

PC 3: Intel Core i7-3770 4c/8t @ 4.22-4.43GHz, Asus P8Z77-V LK, 16GB DDR3 1648MHz, Asus RX 470 Strix, 1TB & 250GB Crucial MX500 and 3x 500GB HDD

Laptop: ThinkPad T440p, Intel Core i7-4800MQ 4c/8t @ 2.7-3.7GHz, 16GB DDR3 1600MHz, GeForce GT 730M (GPU: 1006MHz MEM: 1151MHz), 2TB SSD, 14" 1080p IPS, 100Wh battery

Laptop 2: ThinkPad T450, Intel Core i7-5600U 2c/4t @ 2.6-3.2GHz, 16GB DDR3 1600MHz, Intel HD 5500, 250GB SSD, 14" 900p TN, 24Wh + 72Wh batteries

Phone: Huawei Honor 9 64GB + 256GB card Watch: Motorola Moto 360 1st Gen.

General X58 Xeon/i7 discussion

Some other PC's:

Spoiler

Some of the specs of these systems might not be up to date

PC 4: Intel Xeon X5675 6c/12t @ 3.07-3.47GHz, HP 0B4Ch (X58), 12GB DDR3 1333MHz, Asus GeForce GTX 660 DC2, 240GB & 120GB SSD, 1TB HDD

PC 5: Intel Xeon W3550 @ 3.07GHz, HP (X58), 8GB DDR3, NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 (GPU: 1050MHz MEM: 1250MHz), 120GB SSD, 2TB, 1TB and 500GB HDD

PC 6: Intel Core2 Quad Q9550 @ 3.8GHz, Asus P5KC, 8GB DDR2, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470, 120GB SSD and 500GB HDD

HTPC: Intel Core2 Quad Q6600 @ 3.0GHz, HP DC7900SFF, 8GB DDR2 800MHz, Asus Radeon HD 6570, 240GB SSD and 3TB HDD

WinXP PC: Intel Core2 Duo E6300 @ 2.33GHz, Asus P5B, 2GB DDR2 667MHz, NVIDIA GeForce 8500 GT, 32GB SSD and 80GB HDD

RetroPC: Intel Pentium 4 HT @ 3.0GHz, Gigabyte GA-8SGXLFS, 2gb DDR1, ATi Radeon 9800 Pro, 2x 40gb HDD

My first PC: Intel Celeron 333MHz, Diamond Micronics C400, 384mb RAM, Diamond Viper V550 (NVIDIA Riva TNT), 6gb and 8gb HDD

Server: 2x Intel Xeon E5420, Dell PowerEdge 2950, 32gb DDR2, ATI ES1000, 4x 146gb SAS

Dual Opteron PC: 2x 6-core AMD Opteron 2419EE, HP XW9400, 32GB DDR2, ATI Radeon 3650, 500gb HDD

Core2 Duo PC: Intel Core2 Duo E8400, HP DC7800, 4gb DDR2, NVIDIA Quadro FX1700, 1tb and 80gb HDD

Athlon XP PC: AMD Athlon XP 2400+, MSI something, 1,5gb DDR1, ATI Radeon 9200, 40gb HDD

Thinkpad: Intel Core2 Duo T7200, Lenovo Thinkpad T60, 4gb DDR2, ATI Mobility Radeon X1400, 1tb HDD

Pentium 3 PC: Intel Pentium 3 866MHz, Asus CUSL2-C, 512mb RAM, 3DFX VooDoo 3 2000 AGP

Laptop: Dell Latitude E6430, Intel Core i5-3210M, 6gb DDR3 1600MHz , Intel HD 4000, 250gb Samsung SSD 860 EVO, 1TB WD Blue HDD

Laptop: Latitude 3380, Intel Pentium Gold 4415U 2c/4t @ 2.3GHz, 8GB DDR4, Intel HD 610, 120GB SSD, 13.3" 768p TN, 56Wh battery

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, Pasi123 said:

That depends on the price.

Ryzen 5 1600 or 2600 is a bit faster than the E5-1650 even when it's overclocked to over 4GHz. E5-2690v2 is faster than the Ryzen 5's on multi-core because it has more cores but for gaming it probably isn't as good as the Ryzen's because the single-core performance is lower.

Hmm so I don't know what to do I have now the i7 2600 but I think it's starting to show its old age. I can but the ryzen 5 1600 used for 120$. And if I choose Xeon on lga2011 which one to choose ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

single threaded performance on xeon cpus are not always optimal when compared to lower core count, higher frequency cpus. if you are gaming i reccomend a 6/7700k.

i7-7700k | GTX 1080 Ti | 32GB 3100MHz | Prime Z270-AR

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, qqqqqq said:

single threaded performance on xeon cpus are not always optimal when compared to lower core count, higher frequency cpus. if you are gaming i reccomend a 6/7700k.

But they are very expensive what you think about Intel qhqg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, Pasi123 said:

Xeon can be just as good as an i5, i7 or Ryzen for gaming.

Many Xeon's are based on i7's, for example that E5-1650 is the same as an i7-3930K and it will perform exactly the same.

Most Xeon's you see on the market will have a lower clock speed than most i7's you will see on the market. Yes if you compare a Xeon and i7 with the exact same clock speeds and same core count they will perform the exact same. But most i7's come with higher clock speeds, which games typically seem to favour.

Keep in mind his intent is to achieve a higher frame rate. An older Xeon will utilize DDR3 while a new Ryzen will utilize DDR4.

Intel Core i7 9700F / Cooler Master 212 Evo / GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER / 16 GB G.SKILL RAM @ 2666MHz / GA-B365M-DS3H / EVGA 500w PSU

HP Pavilion Gaming 15 / Ryzen 5 4600H / GeForce GTX 1050 / 8 GB @ 3200MHz

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×