Rekhyt
-
Posts
210 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Reputation Activity
-
Rekhyt got a reaction from bmxtricky5 in Sexual Orientation? (16+)
Mobosexual.
I'm greatly attracted to well-featured motherboards; Intercourse usually involves rapidly pushing an ethernet plug in and out of the port.
My current one has two ports... she's a little kinky.
-
Rekhyt got a reaction from rektengle in ActionScript 3.0 Thread For All of You Flash Programming Lovers.
I learned programming in AS 2.0 when I first started. Most of the fun I had was using a program called mProjector, which added libraries geared towards desktop software and compiled to an executable, spent most of my time from age 12 to 14 making windowless desktop widgets and the like. Really fun and easy.
I always hoped adobe would eventually add that kind of feature to the language but instead we got flex and all that nonsense Makes me sad.
-
Rekhyt reacted to Lil Chillbil in Guys... I don't know what I'll do with my life.
Get high a lotttttttttt and claim to of invented everything then die of cancer at a young age.
-
Rekhyt got a reaction from Ryshious in LTT Conglomerate main discussion thread
Aaaand... 39 million.
-
Rekhyt got a reaction from Apollo_413 in LTT Conglomerate main discussion thread
Hey, I just sent my application and voted "exploration" on the poll (like everyone else ) I'm wondering however what "engineering" entails exactly, can someone enlighten me?
Otherwise my ships are: Super Hornet, Constellation, 325a, and Freelancer
-
Rekhyt reacted to Jebex in LTT Conglomerate main discussion thread
The devs confirmed that orgs could control factories, so engineering might have to do with that too.
-
Rekhyt reacted to IG-88 in LTT Conglomerate main discussion thread
I'm pretty sure in this thread somewhere (don't want to look for it) that the different sections were loosely defined and if I remember correctly engineering was going to involve crafting and manufacturing items.
-
Rekhyt got a reaction from madknight3 in Help with C++ do...while loop
If you look at the order of instructions in your code, you'll realize you're prompting for the username, then doing cin.get, then cin >> thepassword resulting in strange behavior (if you echo the promted password at that point you'll see it's "estPass", the first character is missing.
Here's a better version of that code, using c++ variable assignment, and taking out the unnecessary steps, like repeating "TestUser". The point of variables is to use them everywhere, instead of hard coding what they contain!
#include <iostream>using namespace std;int main(){ const string userName("TestUser"); const string userPass("TestPass"); string inputName; string inputPass; //Declare variables at the top, using C++ syntax for assignment cout << "Username: \n"; //Prompt User name once cin >> inputName; while(inputName != userName) { //the Whole loop will be ignored if the User name is correct cout << "Incorrect Username, try again \n Username: \n"; //If not prompt again but with error message cin >> inputName; }//Once the first looop is exited or ignored, repeat for the password cout << "Password: \n"; cin >> inputPass; while(inputPass != userPass) { cout << "Incorrect Password, try again \n Username: \n"; cin >> inputPass; }cout << "Login Succesful.";//End of Login Process} -
Rekhyt reacted to DoubleY in Youtube has changed again...
Already posted.
No need for capturing both monitors.
No need for suicide gif
Stop complaining about youtube, there isn't a damn thing your complaining will do about it.
Besides, it looks just fine
-
Rekhyt got a reaction from Ciccioo in Help with C++ do...while loop
If you look at the order of instructions in your code, you'll realize you're prompting for the username, then doing cin.get, then cin >> thepassword resulting in strange behavior (if you echo the promted password at that point you'll see it's "estPass", the first character is missing.
Here's a better version of that code, using c++ variable assignment, and taking out the unnecessary steps, like repeating "TestUser". The point of variables is to use them everywhere, instead of hard coding what they contain!
#include <iostream>using namespace std;int main(){ const string userName("TestUser"); const string userPass("TestPass"); string inputName; string inputPass; //Declare variables at the top, using C++ syntax for assignment cout << "Username: \n"; //Prompt User name once cin >> inputName; while(inputName != userName) { //the Whole loop will be ignored if the User name is correct cout << "Incorrect Username, try again \n Username: \n"; //If not prompt again but with error message cin >> inputName; }//Once the first looop is exited or ignored, repeat for the password cout << "Password: \n"; cin >> inputPass; while(inputPass != userPass) { cout << "Incorrect Password, try again \n Username: \n"; cin >> inputPass; }cout << "Login Succesful.";//End of Login Process} -
Rekhyt got a reaction from alicskysareblue in What alcholic beverage do u drink/prefer?
A good red wine, a good whiskey or a good cognac. I can't stand all the cheap shit people buy so they can drink more, faster; that completely escapes my understanding.
No ice in anything, it inhibits the flavors.
-
Rekhyt got a reaction from LOST TALE in Stuck in assassins creed brotherhood
Dropping is "e" in AC, if that doesn't work, go in to the control bindings.
-
Rekhyt got a reaction from ComputerNoob in Sexual Orientation? (16+)
Mobosexual.
I'm greatly attracted to well-featured motherboards; Intercourse usually involves rapidly pushing an ethernet plug in and out of the port.
My current one has two ports... she's a little kinky.
-
Rekhyt got a reaction from AlwaysFSX in Sexual Orientation? (16+)
Mobosexual.
I'm greatly attracted to well-featured motherboards; Intercourse usually involves rapidly pushing an ethernet plug in and out of the port.
My current one has two ports... she's a little kinky.
-
Rekhyt got a reaction from Clone Trooper 501 in Sexual Orientation? (16+)
Mobosexual.
I'm greatly attracted to well-featured motherboards; Intercourse usually involves rapidly pushing an ethernet plug in and out of the port.
My current one has two ports... she's a little kinky.
-
Rekhyt got a reaction from TeamTactical in So, uh highschool is for making out with chicks right?
Waiting for the government to let you have sex. 0/10
And use paragraphs man. Please, use paragraphs.
-
-
Rekhyt got a reaction from teddyteddyteddy in Changes to Youtube's video game content monetization
Not someone else's creation? So Linus makes graphics cards and fans himself?
Of course not, in both cases someone gets someone else's product, be it a game or a phone, plays it/uses it, and then creates footage showcasing said product and gives a commentary.
-
Rekhyt got a reaction from teddyteddyteddy in Changes to Youtube's video game content monetization
First, and as we all know, they get paid for ad views, regardless of the content. That's not the same thing as throwing money at people for playing Mario, Google doesn't "pay them for playing", google gives them a cut of the advertising revenue that the videos generated for them.
Second, and regardless of my previous point, why shouldn't they? Buying electronics, unboxin them and playing with them is certainly something I like to do and do a lot. Shouldn't Linus get ad revenue either then?
What about video game review websites? Those are also people who play games for a living and give their opinion on the internet. Is it unfair that they make money from it in your model?
Third, monetization is incentive. By allowing monetization models to exist on any given platform, you create competition, not everyone can be big and get the money; that's how you increase the amount of content produced, and its production quality. That's the difference between listening to A) a TB review that's been researched and thought out by a smart guy, and recorded and edited on good equipment, or B ) an excited 17 year old guy in his college dorm screaming "WAAAAA BRO I JUST KILLED THAT DUDE SHIIIIIIT" into his integrated microphone at 240p with music in the background.
Entertainment is moving away from television and cable; Platforms like youtube and netflix are becoming the main entertainment hubs, and if you want quality, regular content to be available on those platforms (free of charge to you, I might add) you have to realize that content is legitimate as long as it has viewers, and that it's not only normal, but essential to compensate those who create the content, and do it well.
-
Rekhyt got a reaction from AdamThePole in Changes to Youtube's video game content monetization
First, and as we all know, they get paid for ad views, regardless of the content. That's not the same thing as throwing money at people for playing Mario, Google doesn't "pay them for playing", google gives them a cut of the advertising revenue that the videos generated for them.
Second, and regardless of my previous point, why shouldn't they? Buying electronics, unboxin them and playing with them is certainly something I like to do and do a lot. Shouldn't Linus get ad revenue either then?
What about video game review websites? Those are also people who play games for a living and give their opinion on the internet. Is it unfair that they make money from it in your model?
Third, monetization is incentive. By allowing monetization models to exist on any given platform, you create competition, not everyone can be big and get the money; that's how you increase the amount of content produced, and its production quality. That's the difference between listening to A) a TB review that's been researched and thought out by a smart guy, and recorded and edited on good equipment, or B ) an excited 17 year old guy in his college dorm screaming "WAAAAA BRO I JUST KILLED THAT DUDE SHIIIIIIT" into his integrated microphone at 240p with music in the background.
Entertainment is moving away from television and cable; Platforms like youtube and netflix are becoming the main entertainment hubs, and if you want quality, regular content to be available on those platforms (free of charge to you, I might add) you have to realize that content is legitimate as long as it has viewers, and that it's not only normal, but essential to compensate those who create the content, and do it well.
-
Rekhyt got a reaction from Common_Courtesy in Changes to Youtube's video game content monetization
Not someone else's creation? So Linus makes graphics cards and fans himself?
Of course not, in both cases someone gets someone else's product, be it a game or a phone, plays it/uses it, and then creates footage showcasing said product and gives a commentary.
-
Rekhyt got a reaction from EChondo in Changes to Youtube's video game content monetization
Serious video game reviewers, i.e. the ones that make money from it are also given review codes for free and have direct interactions with the studios. So there goes that.
Linus' sponsorship deals aren't systematic (they only apply to the WAN show, or computex coverage, ...), AND Linus hasn't always been sponsored. To get big enough for sponsorship, you have to go a long while on ad revenue only. Game reviewers also get the occasional sponsorship from major game events and such . So there goes that too
-
Rekhyt got a reaction from EChondo in Changes to Youtube's video game content monetization
Not someone else's creation? So Linus makes graphics cards and fans himself?
Of course not, in both cases someone gets someone else's product, be it a game or a phone, plays it/uses it, and then creates footage showcasing said product and gives a commentary.
-
Rekhyt got a reaction from EChondo in Changes to Youtube's video game content monetization
First, and as we all know, they get paid for ad views, regardless of the content. That's not the same thing as throwing money at people for playing Mario, Google doesn't "pay them for playing", google gives them a cut of the advertising revenue that the videos generated for them.
Second, and regardless of my previous point, why shouldn't they? Buying electronics, unboxin them and playing with them is certainly something I like to do and do a lot. Shouldn't Linus get ad revenue either then?
What about video game review websites? Those are also people who play games for a living and give their opinion on the internet. Is it unfair that they make money from it in your model?
Third, monetization is incentive. By allowing monetization models to exist on any given platform, you create competition, not everyone can be big and get the money; that's how you increase the amount of content produced, and its production quality. That's the difference between listening to A) a TB review that's been researched and thought out by a smart guy, and recorded and edited on good equipment, or B ) an excited 17 year old guy in his college dorm screaming "WAAAAA BRO I JUST KILLED THAT DUDE SHIIIIIIT" into his integrated microphone at 240p with music in the background.
Entertainment is moving away from television and cable; Platforms like youtube and netflix are becoming the main entertainment hubs, and if you want quality, regular content to be available on those platforms (free of charge to you, I might add) you have to realize that content is legitimate as long as it has viewers, and that it's not only normal, but essential to compensate those who create the content, and do it well.
-
Rekhyt reacted to Mooshi in I knew us Americans were bad but this is just sad.
I kinda stopped reading when I saw the phrase "global warming", can we please stop repeating this outdated phrase like a bunch of parrots? The Earth has been through several heat and cool cycles over the course of its existence. Man didn't magically cause the world to go into utter chaos. Mother nature has been spewing toxins for many years naturally in the form of volcanos ect. She'll be fine.
What bothers me more when it comes to the average American is not this pompous article. It's the fact that we have people with power who doesn't even know what type of freaking government the country has. Every time I hear Obama spew out "Democracy", I cringe so hard on the inside. The freaking president of the USA doesn't know this is a constitutional republic or that the founding fathers loathed democracy. And yet we have kids taught lies every day in school from things like this to white-washed history. That bothers me way more than some article getting preachy about global warming.