Jump to content

CPU usage in Battlefiled 5

Go to solution Solved by FredricoSWE,
On 11/12/2018 at 4:41 AM, Ebony Falcon said:

I know but last thing u want is to think ur hardware isn’t working right 

 

On 11/12/2018 at 12:26 AM, A Random Dude said:

So you have BF1 too? Or did you mean to say BF5? Everything I said may come in handy after all.

 

So your i5 is holding at 100% in BF1? You may need to optimize your PC in general. I've done so many things to my PC to make it perform better and rid the tiny bottleneck my i5 sometimes presents, I've never had the need to upgrade my CPU. Things like disabling in-game overlay in Origin(or any client rather). Disable background processes you don't need. Put your PC power plan on high performance. Put your GPU on Prefer maximum performance in the Nvidia control panel. Empty temp folders. Clear standby memory using Process Hacker(beneficial if you have high RAM usage and/or stuttering issues). Disable TONS of things in the Windows 10 settings in general. The list goes on and on to optimizing your PC for performance.

I finally found the problem, there's a setting called "future frame rendering" in BF5. You get less inputlag when you disable it and when you enable it you get higher fps, at a cost of a little more inputlag(allmost not noticeable). When i enabled it i went from 90 fps at 60-70% GPU utilization to 140 fps at 100% GPU utilization on ultra. When i put everything on low i get Ca. 190 fps at 100% GPU utilization.

What's your FPS at?

 

If your FPS is being capped by VSync or similar, that could be why.

Specs: CPU - Intel i7 8700K @ 5GHz | GPU - Gigabyte GTX 970 G1 Gaming | Motherboard - ASUS Strix Z370-G WIFI AC | RAM - XPG Gammix DDR4-3000MHz 32GB (2x16GB) | Main Drive - Samsung 850 Evo 500GB M.2 | Other Drives - 7TB/3 Drives | CPU Cooler - Corsair H100i Pro | Case - Fractal Design Define C Mini TG | Power Supply - EVGA G3 850W

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, A Random Dude said:

Completely normal. Crank up them settings and they'll go up. Plus your game will look better.

But if neither of the GPU or the CPU are at 100%, shouldn't something else be bottle-necking them? Or am i misunderstanding this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, FredricoSWE said:

But if neither of the GPU or the CPU are at 100%, shouldn't something else be bottle-necking them? Or am i misunderstanding this?

Your settings being on low is most likely the reason your GPU and CPU are not pushing much usage.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, FredricoSWE said:

But if neither of the GPU or the CPU are at 100%, shouldn't something else be bottle-necking them? Or am i misunderstanding this?

It gets to a point the bottleneck is the game engine itself, or some other software, games won't keep scaling forever as you turn settings down.

Personal Desktop":

CPU: Intel Core i7 10700K @5ghz |~| Cooling: bq! Dark Rock Pro 4 |~| MOBO: Gigabyte Z490UD ATX|~| RAM: 16gb DDR4 3333mhzCL16 G.Skill Trident Z |~| GPU: RX 6900XT Sapphire Nitro+ |~| PSU: Corsair TX650M 80Plus Gold |~| Boot:  SSD WD Green M.2 2280 240GB |~| Storage: 1x3TB HDD 7200rpm Seagate Barracuda + SanDisk Ultra 3D 1TB |~| Case: Fractal Design Meshify C Mini |~| Display: Toshiba UL7A 4K/60hz |~| OS: Windows 10 Pro.

Luna, the temporary Desktop:

CPU: AMD R9 7950XT  |~| Cooling: bq! Dark Rock 4 Pro |~| MOBO: Gigabyte Aorus Master |~| RAM: 32G Kingston HyperX |~| GPU: AMD Radeon RX 7900XTX (Reference) |~| PSU: Corsair HX1000 80+ Platinum |~| Windows Boot Drive: 2x 512GB (1TB total) Plextor SATA SSD (RAID0 volume) |~| Linux Boot Drive: 500GB Kingston A2000 |~| Storage: 4TB WD Black HDD |~| Case: Cooler Master Silencio S600 |~| Display 1 (leftmost): Eizo (unknown model) 1920x1080 IPS @ 60Hz|~| Display 2 (center): BenQ ZOWIE XL2540 1920x1080 TN @ 240Hz |~| Display 3 (rightmost): Wacom Cintiq Pro 24 3840x2160 IPS @ 60Hz 10-bit |~| OS: Windows 10 Pro (games / art) + Linux (distro: NixOS; programming and daily driver)
Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, A Random Dude said:

Your settings being on low is most likely the reason your GPU and CPU are not pushing much usage.

 

2 minutes ago, Princess Cadence said:

It gets to a point the bottleneck is the game engine itself, or some other software, games won't keep scaling forever as you turn settings down.

Ok, so i might get around the same fps at medium settings, compared to low?

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, FredricoSWE said:

 

Ok, so i might get around the same fps at medium settings, compared to low?

Why don't you go ahead and test it yourself? usually you should start on all ultra and set it down seeing whether or not that gives desirable fps boost and not start on the absolute lowest when you have good hardware like an i5 9600K

Personal Desktop":

CPU: Intel Core i7 10700K @5ghz |~| Cooling: bq! Dark Rock Pro 4 |~| MOBO: Gigabyte Z490UD ATX|~| RAM: 16gb DDR4 3333mhzCL16 G.Skill Trident Z |~| GPU: RX 6900XT Sapphire Nitro+ |~| PSU: Corsair TX650M 80Plus Gold |~| Boot:  SSD WD Green M.2 2280 240GB |~| Storage: 1x3TB HDD 7200rpm Seagate Barracuda + SanDisk Ultra 3D 1TB |~| Case: Fractal Design Meshify C Mini |~| Display: Toshiba UL7A 4K/60hz |~| OS: Windows 10 Pro.

Luna, the temporary Desktop:

CPU: AMD R9 7950XT  |~| Cooling: bq! Dark Rock 4 Pro |~| MOBO: Gigabyte Aorus Master |~| RAM: 32G Kingston HyperX |~| GPU: AMD Radeon RX 7900XTX (Reference) |~| PSU: Corsair HX1000 80+ Platinum |~| Windows Boot Drive: 2x 512GB (1TB total) Plextor SATA SSD (RAID0 volume) |~| Linux Boot Drive: 500GB Kingston A2000 |~| Storage: 4TB WD Black HDD |~| Case: Cooler Master Silencio S600 |~| Display 1 (leftmost): Eizo (unknown model) 1920x1080 IPS @ 60Hz|~| Display 2 (center): BenQ ZOWIE XL2540 1920x1080 TN @ 240Hz |~| Display 3 (rightmost): Wacom Cintiq Pro 24 3840x2160 IPS @ 60Hz 10-bit |~| OS: Windows 10 Pro (games / art) + Linux (distro: NixOS; programming and daily driver)
Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Princess Cadence said:

Why don't you go ahead and test it yourself? usually you should start on all ultra and set it down seeing whether or not that gives desirable fps boost and not start on the absolute lowest when you have good hardware like an i5 9600K

Yea of course i can test it, but theoretically should it not lower my fps so much going from low to medium. Because the game engine won't bottleneck as much?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I have to disagree because on all low I hit the 200 FPS limit and it doesn’t budge

 

run msi after burner overlay and see if 1 thread is being maxed out or something 

 

what at are I using to know that it’s not pushing ur hardware 

 

make sure there are no dynamic settings enabled etc 

-14900kf

- 4000 32gb ram 

-4070ti super duper 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, FredricoSWE said:

Yea of course i can test it, but theoretically should it not lower my fps so much going from low to medium. Because the game engine won't bottleneck as much?

Say the engine caps fps to 120 and your system is capable of achieving 120fps on high, that means going from low to medium will keep getting you the exact same 120fps.

 

Again, you'll know it when you try it.

Personal Desktop":

CPU: Intel Core i7 10700K @5ghz |~| Cooling: bq! Dark Rock Pro 4 |~| MOBO: Gigabyte Z490UD ATX|~| RAM: 16gb DDR4 3333mhzCL16 G.Skill Trident Z |~| GPU: RX 6900XT Sapphire Nitro+ |~| PSU: Corsair TX650M 80Plus Gold |~| Boot:  SSD WD Green M.2 2280 240GB |~| Storage: 1x3TB HDD 7200rpm Seagate Barracuda + SanDisk Ultra 3D 1TB |~| Case: Fractal Design Meshify C Mini |~| Display: Toshiba UL7A 4K/60hz |~| OS: Windows 10 Pro.

Luna, the temporary Desktop:

CPU: AMD R9 7950XT  |~| Cooling: bq! Dark Rock 4 Pro |~| MOBO: Gigabyte Aorus Master |~| RAM: 32G Kingston HyperX |~| GPU: AMD Radeon RX 7900XTX (Reference) |~| PSU: Corsair HX1000 80+ Platinum |~| Windows Boot Drive: 2x 512GB (1TB total) Plextor SATA SSD (RAID0 volume) |~| Linux Boot Drive: 500GB Kingston A2000 |~| Storage: 4TB WD Black HDD |~| Case: Cooler Master Silencio S600 |~| Display 1 (leftmost): Eizo (unknown model) 1920x1080 IPS @ 60Hz|~| Display 2 (center): BenQ ZOWIE XL2540 1920x1080 TN @ 240Hz |~| Display 3 (rightmost): Wacom Cintiq Pro 24 3840x2160 IPS @ 60Hz 10-bit |~| OS: Windows 10 Pro (games / art) + Linux (distro: NixOS; programming and daily driver)
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Princess Cadence said:

Say the engine caps fps to 120 and your system is capable of achieving 120fps on high, that means going from low to medium will keep getting you the exact same 120fps.

 

Again, you'll know it when you try it.

Caps at 200 

-14900kf

- 4000 32gb ram 

-4070ti super duper 

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Ebony Falcon said:

Well I have to disagree because on all low I hit the 200 FPS limit and it doesn’t budge

 

run msi after burner overlay and see if 1 thread is being maxed out or something 

 

what at are I using to know that it’s not pushing ur hardware 

 

make sure there are no dynamic settings enabled etc 

What hardwear do you have?

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Ebony Falcon said:

8700k and 2080 

hardware regaurdless u should be able to get urs running 100 percent usage on at lease one or the other

Yea, that's how i understand it. I checked on msi afterburner and all my cores are at 70-80% in-game. So i can't understand where the bottleneck is...:(

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, FredricoSWE said:

Yea, that's how i understand it. I checked on msi afterburner and all my cores are at 70-80% in-game. So i can't understand where the bottleneck is...:(

Can U post a screen show with the overlay from In Game pls

 

it may well be a issue because it’s still very new game/ hasn’t officially released yet 

are u on latest drivers ?

-14900kf

- 4000 32gb ram 

-4070ti super duper 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Ebony Falcon said:

Can U post a screen show with the overlay from In Game pls

 

it may well be a issue because it’s still very new game/ hasn’t officially released yet 

are u on latest drivers ?

Yes i have the latest Gpu drivers (416.81 Nvidia), what do you want me to monitor in msi afterburner?

Link to post
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, FredricoSWE said:

Ok, so i might get around the same fps at medium settings, compared to low?

With your hardware, most likely very similar fps. Just crank them up already. No clue why you would own the hardware you have to not use it to it's full potential. Don't you monitor your specs? CPU/GPU/RAM/VRAM usage/power, CPU/GPU temps, etc. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, A Random Dude said:

With your hardware, most likely very similar fps. Just crank them up already. No clue why you would own the hardware you have to not use it to it's full potential. Don't you monitor your specs? CPU/GPU/RAM/VRAM usage/power, CPU/GPU temps, etc. 

Priority 1 when i play games is to get 144Hz, so i don't mind lowering the settings to get higher fps. It's when i started monitoring my specs, that i noticed the cpu was not at 100% utilization.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×