Jump to content

$2000 PC

Zeorth
12 minutes ago, Vasllo said:

You might want to check this: https://www.gamersnexus.net/hwreviews/3378-intel-9900k-cpu-review-solder-vs-paste-delid-gaming-benchmarks-vs-2700x/page-2

And the 9700k might not be binned at all, just have HT disabled and that's it, the rest is just silicon lottery.

Well that proves my point. Not enough of a difference to matter. Still run hot and are harder to overclock because of crap thermals. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Brooksie359 said:

Really? Because I was watch reviews and found the opposite to be true. I was watching der8auer and he was saying he was having a harder time overclocking these chips and needed to some crazy delids to get them to run a decent overclock. Not only that some of them simply refused to go to 5ghz. I honestly think the 9700k is just a bad cpu. The 8700k seems like the better buy 100%. 

 

I read, not watch. ? Most of the reviews I've read report i7-9700K oc between 5.1GHz and 5.3GHz without anything more than good cooling.

 

There are very few bad cpu and I would not place any of the Coffee Lake refresh in that category. If one wants the performance, one has to be willing to pay the premium. Not to say that a lower performing cpu might not be a better value. But "value" is not the same "best".

80+ ratings certify electrical efficiency. Not quality.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Cereal5 said:

Plenty of people can make a PPP list (including you).

  • What games do you play
  • what resolution/refresh rate
  • do you do anything besides game
  • do you want RGB
  • do you have brand preferences
  • any other random stuff?

 

1 hour ago, brob said:

What usage?

Sorry for the late reply but,

Gaming

Stuff like WOT, League, Witcher 3, Battlefield 1, 5, COD, GTA etc.

1080p 144Hz x2

Just everyday stuff

White theme with RGB would be nice

Brands that are reputable like corsair, asus, etc are good.

Nope

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, nick name said:

If you want the best then a CPU and GPU will eat up 95% of that budget.  Can you give a little more guidance?

Just answered the common questions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, OreoPandas said:

Just answered the common questions.

PCPartPicker part list / Price breakdown by merchant

CPU: Intel - Core i7-8700K 3.7GHz 6-Core Processor  ($369.89 @ OutletPC) 
CPU Cooler: Corsair - H100i PRO 75.0 CFM Liquid CPU Cooler  ($109.99 @ Newegg) 
Motherboard: Asus - Prime Z370-A ATX LGA1151 Motherboard  ($159.99 @ Amazon) 
Memory: G.Skill - Trident Z RGB 16GB (2 x 8GB) DDR4-3200 Memory  ($139.99 @ Newegg) 
Storage: Samsung - 860 Evo 500GB 2.5" Solid State Drive  ($86.99 @ Amazon) 
Storage: Western Digital - Caviar Blue 1TB 3.5" 7200RPM Internal Hard Drive  ($42.89 @ OutletPC) 
Video Card: Gigabyte - GeForce GTX 1080 8GB G1 Gaming Video Card  ($514.98 @ Newegg) 
Case: Corsair - Crystal 460X RGB ATX Mid Tower Case  ($129.99 @ Amazon) 
Power Supply: EVGA - SuperNOVA G2 650W 80+ Gold Certified Fully-Modular ATX Power Supply  ($75.88 @ OutletPC) 
Total: $1630.59
Prices include shipping, taxes, and discounts when available
Generated by PCPartPicker 2018-11-02 14:25 EDT-0400

 

No need to spend 2k for 1080p gaming. Even what I have listed is overkill. You can step down the CPU and GPU if you want to save a buck, or step up the GPU if you plan on upping the resolution at any point (that said the 1080 is an excellent 1440p card).

My Build, v2.1 --- CPU: i7-8700K @ 5.2GHz/1.288v || MoBo: Asus ROG STRIX Z390-E Gaming || RAM: 4x4GB G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 2666 14-14-14-33 || Cooler: Custom Loop || GPU: EVGA GTX 1080 Ti SC Black, on water || PSU: EVGA G2 850W || Case: Corsair 450D || SSD: 850 Evo 250GB, Intel 660p 2TB || Storage: WD Blue 2TB || G502 & Glorious PCGR Fully Custom 80% Keyboard || MX34VQ, PG278Q, PB278Q

Audio --- Headphones: Massdrop x Sennheiser HD 6XX || Amp: Schiit Audio Magni 3 || DAC: Schiit Audio Modi 3 || Mic: Blue Yeti

 

[Under Construction]

 

My Truck --- 2002 F-350 7.3 Powerstroke || 6-speed

My Car --- 2006 Mustang GT || 5-speed || BBK LTs, O/R X, MBRP Cat-back || BBK Lowering Springs, LCAs || 2007 GT500 wheels w/ 245s/285s

 

The Experiment --- CPU: i5-3570K @ 4.0 GHz || MoBo: Asus P8Z77-V LK || RAM: 16GB Corsair 1600 4x4 || Cooler: CM Hyper 212 Evo || GPUs: Asus GTX 750 Ti, || PSU: Corsair TX750M Gold || Case: Thermaltake Core G21 TG || SSD: 840 Pro 128GB || HDD: Seagate Barracuda 2TB

 

R.I.P. Asus X99-A motherboard, April 2016 - October 2018, may you rest in peace. 5820K, if I ever buy you a new board, it'll be a good one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, brob said:

 

I read, not watch. ? Most of the reviews I've read report i7-9700K oc between 5.1GHz and 5.3GHz without anything more than good cooling.

 

There are very few bad cpu and I would not place any of the Coffee Lake refresh in that category. If one wants the performance, one has to be willing to pay the premium. Not to say that a lower performing cpu might not be a better value. But "value" is not the same "best".

I would trust der8ure over anyone tbh when it comes to overclocking. These things don't overclock that well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Brooksie359 said:

Well that proves my point. Not enough of a difference to matter. Still run hot and are harder to overclock because of crap thermals. 

https://www.gamersnexus.net/guides/3381-intel-i9-9900k-delid-liquid-metal-5-4ghz-overclock

 

Yes, it is capped by thermals, but a 5C difference does matter, and because of the thicker die, even LM drops just 5C further compared to the solder. What I wanted to point out is that the temps you were mentioning were off by a good margin, it actually runs alright stock, just 37ΔC, and starts to get into the 90C range at 5GHz, not stock, as you mentioned. The problem is not just thermals, the chip just pulls too much power, Intel really pushed past the limit, a 95w tdp (I know, I know) chip pulling 260w overclocked is ridiculous, my OC'd i7 2600k only gets close to half that in Prime95. These CPUs are not great, but not that bad either.

CPU: i5 10600KFMotherboard: Asus B460M-Plus | Cooling: Gamemmaxx 400 XT w/ Corsair ML120 Elite + 1 ML120 Elite exhaust + 2 ML140 Elite intake

RAM: 2x16GB Netac DDR4 3200MT/s @2666CL13 | GPU: Palit RTX 3060 Ti Dual +200/+1200MHz/+5%

Storage: 2TB XPG S70 Blade, WD Blue NVMe 500GB, Seagate Barracuda 2TBPSU: Corsair TX550M

Monitor: 2x Pichau Cepheus Fuse 28" 4k 144Hz HDR | Keyboard: Corsair K70 mk.2 Cherry MX Red

Headphone/headset: Kuba Disco Pro/Gamer + Beyerdynamic DT-770 Pro | OS: Windows 11 Home

Mouse: Corsair M65 Pro RGB + Ugreen Vertical MouseCase: Corsair Carbide 400C

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Vasllo said:

https://www.gamersnexus.net/guides/3381-intel-i9-9900k-delid-liquid-metal-5-4ghz-overclock

 

Yes, it is capped by thermals, but a 5C difference does matter, and because of the thicker die, even LM drops just 5C further compared to the solder. What I wanted to point out is that the temps you were mentioning were off by a good margin, it actually runs alright stock, just 37ΔC, and starts to get into the 90C range at 5GHz, not stock, as you mentioned. The problem is not just thermals, the chip just pulls too much power, Intel really pushed past the limit, a 95w tdp (I know, I know) chip pulling 260w overclocked is ridiculous, my OC'd i7 2600k only gets close to half that in Prime95. These CPUs are not great, but not that bad either.

No they are bad. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Brooksie359 said:

No they are bad. 

Well, the i9 9900k has no competitor and has the best mainstream platform performance ever, and possibly the best performance in games period, so your affirmative is quite subjective and biased tbh, the issues they have doesn't make them bad CPUs.

CPU: i5 10600KFMotherboard: Asus B460M-Plus | Cooling: Gamemmaxx 400 XT w/ Corsair ML120 Elite + 1 ML120 Elite exhaust + 2 ML140 Elite intake

RAM: 2x16GB Netac DDR4 3200MT/s @2666CL13 | GPU: Palit RTX 3060 Ti Dual +200/+1200MHz/+5%

Storage: 2TB XPG S70 Blade, WD Blue NVMe 500GB, Seagate Barracuda 2TBPSU: Corsair TX550M

Monitor: 2x Pichau Cepheus Fuse 28" 4k 144Hz HDR | Keyboard: Corsair K70 mk.2 Cherry MX Red

Headphone/headset: Kuba Disco Pro/Gamer + Beyerdynamic DT-770 Pro | OS: Windows 11 Home

Mouse: Corsair M65 Pro RGB + Ugreen Vertical MouseCase: Corsair Carbide 400C

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Vasllo said:

Well, the i9 9900k has no competitor and has the best mainstream platform performance ever, and possibly the best performance in games period, so your affirmative is quite subjective and biased tbh, the issues they have doesn't make them bad CPUs.

Yes it does make them bad cpus.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×