Is It Me, Or Is The New iPad Pro More Powerful Than The New Base Model MacBook Air?
2 hours ago, TiresomeToe933 said:The iPad Pro has hella more cores, 8 CPU cores VS 2 on the Air. Now sure, you could make the possible statement that the Air's cores are higher clocked or has more cache, so yeah, it will win in single-threaded performances.... But what about multi-core...... Surely the iPad Pro should tower over that little 2 core CPU
Core count doesn't really mean anything if the single core performance is lacking enough. Take for instance the PS4 and Xbox One. They both had 8-core CPUs. Even if you took say two away for the OS (which I'm not really certain of considering how the homebrew market hacked the PS4), you could still have dual-core PCs of the time keep up with it in gaming performance.
2 hours ago, TiresomeToe933 said:The iPad Pro has a dedicated GPU VS the Air which has "integrated graphics". Now I don't wanna make any comparisons on how the interred graphic is better.... because 1. I don't have the time to write up how Integrated Graphics works and 2. Even at the end of the day... a dedicated GPU is better, even if its on a SOC in this case.
It doesn't matter if the GPU is dedicated or not. All that matters is how it actually performs. Besides that, the GPU in the A12X is technically "integrated" as much as the Intel HD is on the MBA.
2 hours ago, TiresomeToe933 said:The iPad Pro has a Neural Network Engine Chip, this is different from the T2 chip. The NNEC (as I'll call it now) can do up to Quote: "1 Trillion Calculations" and whilst the NNEC is for more specific purposes, that chip can help in certain compute tasks
It could help, but it'll only be useful in certain situations. Also the 1 trillion calculations (I'm presuming per second) number only means that. It's likely doing matrix math on tiny numbers in the same way NVIDIA can claim Turing has 114 TFLOPS of compute power... on FP16 values in 4x4 matrices meaning that per tensor core operation they're really doing 16 operations at once, at least.
2 hours ago, TiresomeToe933 said:The iPad Pro is possibly/I think is more optimised. Think about it, the iPad Pro SOC is designed by Apple engineers so they can have a better optimisation with the OS. MacBook Air's on the other hand use Intel chips, meaning they cannot optimise the chip as much.
That's about the only advantage they have making their own SoC, they know how their own hardware works. I'm sure Intel's holding back some secret sauces from Apple, but at the same time, there's only a handful of MBA configurations, so it's not like they can't highly tune the hardware and software.
2 hours ago, TiresomeToe933 said:Like I said, I'm no hardware engineer or software optimisation engineer, but I can definitely tell based of my current knowledge of CPU Clock Speed/Cores ratio that something is just off...
The major problems I have with comparing the two are:
- One's running a full desktop OS, the other is running a tablet OS. Even if the differences in resource usage are minimal as possible, I still can't find this to be a fair comparison
- The only benchmark I've seen that's comparing the two is GeekBench. However I'm inclined to believe GeekBench is heavily weighted towards the iOS devices since there are benchmarks where a 2.3GHz Apple SoC is able to keep up with 3.1GHz Intel chips in single core tests. So unless Intel's IPC is really that bad, I can't really take this with any more than a grain of salt. And there hasn't been any other cross platform benchmarks that I'm aware of.
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now