Jump to content

For 4k gaming, do I need over 16GBs of RAM? And if not, would 4 4GB sticks be better than 2 8GB sticks?

I've always heard you don't need more than 16GBs of RAM for gaming, and I imagine that wouldn't change with a higher resolution, but maybe I'm dead wrong.  And either way, is using all four RAM slots a big improvement over using two?  Is there any scenario where having four 4GB sticks might bottleneck me in some way, in a scenario where a 4GB file needs to exist in memory (which sounds ridiculous, but who knows...)?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not really. I'd personally get 2x4GB sticks of DDR4 since RAM is so fucking expensive right now. If you really need 16GB, I'd get 2x8GB sticks.

Quote me to see my reply!

SPECS:

CPU: Ryzen 7 3700X Motherboard: MSI B450-A Pro Max RAM: 32GB I forget GPU: MSI Vega 56 Storage: 256GB NVMe boot, 512GB Samsung 850 Pro, 1TB WD Blue SSD, 1TB WD Blue HDD PSU: Inwin P85 850w Case: Fractal Design Define C Cooling: Stock for CPU, be quiet! case fans, Morpheus Vega w/ be quiet! Pure Wings 2 for GPU Monitor: 3x Thinkvision P24Q on a Steelcase Eyesite triple monitor stand Mouse: Logitech MX Master 3 Keyboard: Focus FK-9000 (heavily modded) Mousepad: Aliexpress cat special Headphones:  Sennheiser HD598SE and Sony Linkbuds

 

🏳️‍🌈

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

4k is mostly about gpu and cpu performance. However, i had 8gb ram in my PC at 1080p and i saw bad performance when playing games like PUBG and Minecraft. You might just wanna go with 16, or get 8 and wait for prices to drop. I would stay away from 4gb

Specs:

 Gaming PC: i5 3570, 16GB 1600MHz, GTX 780 3GB, Transcend 128GB, WD 500GB, Seagate 500GB, Thermaltake 600W Smart, S340 w/ RGB, Windows 10 Pro

 Server: Xeon E5 2650, 12GB 1600MHz ECC, 8400GS, WD 2TB + 1TB + 1TB, EVGA 500B 500W, Windows 10 Pro

 Laptop: Macbook Pro Retina 2013, i7 4558U, 8GB 1600MHz, Intel Iris Pro 1.5GB, Apple 256GB NVME, Mojave

 

 Internet: $70/month For 500/100, Actually get 525/102

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, EricSartor said:

I've always heard you don't need more than 16GBs of RAM for gaming, and I imagine that wouldn't change with a higher resolution, but maybe I'm dead wrong.  And either way, is using all four RAM slots a big improvement over using two?  Is there any scenario where having four 4GB sticks might bottleneck me in some way, in a scenario where a 4GB file needs to exist in memory (which sounds ridiculous, but who knows...)?

2x8 is preferable, since your cpu likely is dual channel. 16gb is ideal, you will run out, sometimes not in games with just 8gb

CPU: Ryzen 1700@3.9ghz; GPU: EVGA 560 Ti 1gb; RAM: 16gb 2x8 Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4-3000; PCPP: https://pcpartpicker.com/list/b3xzzM

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

In general 16GB are enough for gaming even at 4K.

More important is the ammount of VRAM, once that runs out the files get dumped to the system RAM and things start to go bananas.

4x4GB might be superior to 2x8 if you are running a quad channel board. On Dual channel it will not matter. I would go with 2x8GB on dual channel for sure. When upgrading  the 2x8GB setup make sure to get the same model of RAM for less pain in a*** troubleshooting when things go south.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

On dual channel 4x4GB could be better than 2x8GB, depending on the module types. There are advantages to having 2 rank per channel if all else is equal. 4x4GB would give that for sure. 8GB modules may be single or dual rank, with a trend that faster/lower latency modules are more likely single rank. Running dual rank per channel gives an increase in bandwidth over single, although it also increases measured latency. Overall it seems to work out a net positive.

 

If quad channel system, 4 modules for sure.

Gaming system: R7 7800X3D, Asus ROG Strix B650E-F Gaming Wifi, Thermalright Phantom Spirit 120 SE ARGB, Corsair Vengeance 2x 32GB 6000C30, RTX 4070, MSI MPG A850G, Fractal Design North, Samsung 990 Pro 2TB, Acer Predator XB241YU 24" 1440p 144Hz G-Sync + HP LP2475w 24" 1200p 60Hz wide gamut
Productivity system: i9-7980XE, Asus X299 TUF mark 2, Noctua D15, 64GB ram (mixed), RTX 3070, NZXT E850, GameMax Abyss, Samsung 980 Pro 2TB, random 1080p + 720p displays.
Gaming laptop: Lenovo Legion 5, 5800H, RTX 3070, Kingston DDR4 3200C22 2x16GB 2Rx8, Kingston Fury Renegade 1TB + Crucial P1 1TB SSD, 165 Hz IPS 1080p G-Sync Compatible

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2x8 is better than 4x4 because they generally run faster(there are test on youtube) unless the 4x4 has a higher speed and less CAS then it is a different story, and you are able to upgrade to 32GB soon if you need though i do agree with BloodyWaters 16 is overkill ATM and 32 is so overkill for gaming unless you plan on playing with yourself i guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, EricSartor said:

I've always heard you don't need more than 16GBs of RAM for gaming, and I imagine that wouldn't change with a higher resolution, but maybe I'm dead wrong.  And either way, is using all four RAM slots a big improvement over using two?  Is there any scenario where having four 4GB sticks might bottleneck me in some way, in a scenario where a 4GB file needs to exist in memory (which sounds ridiculous, but who knows...)?

nobody knows for sure, but getting 8gb of ram instead of 16gb held my old system back for a long time, maybe it'll happen for 16 and 32, that said, 32gb pricing right now is just ridiculous. I couldnt even pull the trigger on 2x16gb ram for my overkill build.

5950x 1.33v 5.05 4.5 88C 195w ll R20 12k ll drp4 ll x570 dark hero ll gskill 4x8gb 3666 14-14-14-32-320-24-2T (zen trfc)  1.45v 45C 1.15v soc ll 6950xt gaming x trio 325w 60C ll samsung 970 500gb nvme os ll sandisk 4tb ssd ll 6x nf12/14 ippc fans ll tt gt10 case ll evga g2 1300w ll w10 pro ll 34GN850B ll AW3423DW

 

9900k 1.36v 5.1avx 4.9ring 85C 195w (daily) 1.02v 4.3ghz 80w 50C R20 temps score=5500 ll D15 ll Z390 taichi ult 1.60 bios ll gskill 4x8gb 14-14-14-30-280-20 ddr3666bdie 1.45v 45C 1.22sa/1.18 io  ll EVGA 30 non90 tie ftw3 1920//10000 0.85v 300w 71C ll  6x nf14 ippc 2000rpm ll 500gb nvme 970 evo ll l sandisk 4tb sata ssd +4tb exssd backup ll 2x 500gb samsung 970 evo raid 0 llCorsair graphite 780T ll EVGA P2 1200w ll w10p ll NEC PA241w ll pa32ucg-k

 

prebuilt 5800 stock ll 2x8gb ddr4 cl17 3466 ll oem 3080 0.85v 1890//10000 290w 74C ll 27gl850b ll pa272w ll w11

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unless it's a budget build, I would go with 16GB over 8 at this point but you don't need more than 16GB. In some games I see my RAM usage go up to ~12GB of RAM and many games go above 8GB. Especially if you run things in the background while gaming. As for 2x8 vs 4x4: If you have a CPU/mobo that can only use dual channel then get 2x8. If you have one that can take advantage of quad channel and has 8 slots (so you can upgrade if needed in the future) then go with 4x4.

Primary PC-

CPU: Intel i7-6800k @ 4.2-4.4Ghz   CPU COOLER: Bequiet Dark Rock Pro 4   MOBO: MSI X99A SLI Plus   RAM: 32GB Corsair Vengeance LPX quad-channel DDR4-2800  GPU: EVGA GTX 1080 SC2 iCX   PSU: Corsair RM1000i   CASE: Corsair 750D Obsidian   SSDs: 500GB Samsung 960 Evo + 256GB Samsung 850 Pro   HDDs: Toshiba 3TB + Seagate 1TB   Monitors: Acer Predator XB271HUC 27" 2560x1440 (165Hz G-Sync)  +  LG 29UM57 29" 2560x1080   OS: Windows 10 Pro

Album

Other Systems:

Spoiler

Home HTPC/NAS-

CPU: AMD FX-8320 @ 4.4Ghz  MOBO: Gigabyte 990FXA-UD3   RAM: 16GB dual-channel DDR3-1600  GPU: Gigabyte GTX 760 OC   PSU: Rosewill 750W   CASE: Antec Gaming One   SSD: 120GB PNY CS1311   HDDs: WD Red 3TB + WD 320GB   Monitor: Samsung SyncMaster 2693HM 26" 1920x1200 -or- Steam Link to Vizio M43C1 43" 4K TV  OS: Windows 10 Pro

 

Offsite NAS/VM Server-

CPU: 2x Xeon E5645 (12-core)  Model: Dell PowerEdge T610  RAM: 16GB DDR3-1333  PSUs: 2x 570W  SSDs: 8GB Kingston Boot FD + 32GB Sandisk Cache SSD   HDDs: WD Red 4TB + Seagate 2TB + Seagate 320GB   OS: FreeNAS 11+

 

Laptop-

CPU: Intel i7-3520M   Model: Dell Latitude E6530   RAM: 8GB dual-channel DDR3-1600  GPU: Nvidia NVS 5200M   SSD: 240GB TeamGroup L5   HDD: WD Black 320GB   Monitor: Samsung SyncMaster 2693HM 26" 1920x1200   OS: Windows 10 Pro

Having issues with a Corsair AIO? Possible fix here:

Spoiler

Are you getting weird fan behavior, speed fluctuations, and/or other issues with Link?

Are you running AIDA64, HWinfo, CAM, or HWmonitor? (ASUS suite & other monitoring software often have the same issue.)

Corsair Link has problems with some monitoring software so you may have to change some settings to get them to work smoothly.

-For AIDA64: First make sure you have the newest update installed, then, go to Preferences>Stability and make sure the "Corsair Link sensor support" box is checked and make sure the "Asetek LC sensor support" box is UNchecked.

-For HWinfo: manually disable all monitoring of the AIO sensors/components.

-For others: Disable any monitoring of Corsair AIO sensors.

That should fix the fan issue for some Corsair AIOs (H80i GT/v2, H110i GTX/H115i, H100i GTX and others made by Asetek). The problem is bad coding in Link that fights for AIO control with other programs. You can test if this worked by setting the fan speed in Link to 100%, if it doesn't fluctuate you are set and can change the curve to whatever. If that doesn't work or you're still having other issues then you probably still have a monitoring software interfering with the AIO/Link communications, find what it is and disable it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×