Jump to content

Is AMD Gpus dying?

zindan
By zindan
in Graphics Cards
 Share
Go to solution Solved by Phentos,
3 minutes ago, zindan said:

That's exactly the kind of explanation I am looking for. Thank you sir. Hmm, my conclusion is that I don't really like AMD. Feels kinda fragile and fake in a way. Like when you buy a made in china product. Intel/Nvidia feels so much safer and better. 

For pure gaming, Intel/Nvidia are unquestionably superior. Especially when it comes to high refresh rate gaming.

 

However if you do any kind of productivity and/or don't care about high refresh rate gaming, AMD's Ryzen CPUs offer the better value at the moment. Hence why I went with the Ryzen 1700 and sold my 7700K a few months back. 

Posted

They fucking suck compared to the GTX series. And their best card is a Vega/fury something.... That card can't even be compared to the Titanxp/1080TI and raptr software is closing down. Wtf? Are they even gonna make a card that can compete with Nvidias top card? 

I remember back in the days when the best Nvidia card was sort of equal to the AMDs best card. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

isn't the point with this new lineup to give a videocard with best performance for money? with a new architecture and all.. perhaps it's in the pipeline?? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

Your grammar seems to be.

PC Specs :

Main System:

CPU: AMD Ryzen 5 1600 @3.8 GHz

CPU Cooler: Stock - My AIO died

RAM: 16GB G.Skill TridentZ RGB 3200MHz DDR4

Graphics Card: Zotac GTX 1080 Mini

Motherboard: Asus Prime X470-Pro

PSU: Corsair CS550m

Storage: 250GB Samsung 850 EVO / 1TB Seagate Barracuda / 6TB Seagate IronWolf NAS

Case: Fractal Design Define R6 TG

Monitor: Acer 27” Monitor KG271 144Hz / LG 29UM67-P / 24" Dell UltraSharp Monitor

Audio: Sennheiser HD 599 headphones / Blue Yeti microphone

Mouse: Glorious Model O / Logitech G903

Keyboard: HyperX Alloy FPS

 

Laptop - Dell G5 15 5590 SE:

CPU: Intel Core i7-9750H

RAM: 8GB DDR4

Graphics Card: Gigabyte GTX 1660 TI

 

Secondary PC:

CPU: Intel Core i5-4690k

RAM: 24GB G.Skill Ripjaws X RAM

CPU Cooler: CoolerMaster Hyper 212 EVO

Motherboard: Asus Maximus VII Hero

Graphics Card: Gigabyte GTX 1060 3GB

PSU: Generic Azza 500W Power Supply (It's probably about to blow up)

Case: InWin 805 Infinity (never buy this case)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

I wouldn't say that AMD's GPU's are "dying". It's just that Nvidia's products are simply better. At least for now. 

 

Most of AMD's resources went into Ryzen, Threadripper, and Epyc... all three of which are much more important for the overall long-term prospects of the company. Vega was more like a shoe-in to get a product into the high end gaming GPU market. 

 

Navi will be the first GPU architecture that Raja has had full control of, and it's supposed to promise more scalability which would make it follow the same principle as Ryzen CPUs... being modular, completely scalable, and more importantly very cheap to manufacture. Why manufacture a bunch of different die designs when you could manufacture one design and disable parts of it for lower-tier SKUs.

 

Whether or not that will actually help AMD compete more evenly with Nvidia is anybody's guess.

New Build (The Compromise): CPU - i7 9700K @ 5.1Ghz | Mobo - ASRock Z390 Taichi | RAM - 16GB G.SKILL TridentZ RGB 3200CL14 @ 3466 14-14-14-30 1T | GPU - ASUS Strix GTX 1080 TI | Cooler - Corsair h100i Pro | SSDs - 500 GB 960 EVO + 500 GB 850 EVO + 1TB MX300 | Case - Coolermaster H500 | PSU - EVGA 850 P2 | Monitor - LG 32GK850G-B 144hz 1440p | OS - Windows 10 Pro. 

Peripherals - Corsair K70 Lux RGB | Corsair Scimitar RGB | Audio-technica ATH M50X + Antlion Modmic 5 |

CPU/GPU history: Athlon 6000+/HD4850 > i7 2600k/GTX 580, R9 390, R9 Fury > i7 7700K/R9 Fury, 1080TI > Ryzen 1700/1080TI > i7 9700K/1080TI.

Other tech: Surface Pro 4 (i5/128GB), Lenovo Ideapad Y510P w/ Kali, OnePlus 6T (8G/128G), PS4 Slim.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
10 minutes ago, zindan said:

They fucking suck compared to the GTX series. And their best card is a Vega/fury something.... That card can't even be compared to the Titanxp/1080TI and raptr software is closing down. Wtf? Are they even gonna make a card that can compete with Nvidias top card? 

I remember back in the days when the best Nvidia card was sort of equal to the AMDs best card. 

Holy shit AMD completely BTFO

 

How can they recover from this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
  • Author
5 minutes ago, Tokeegee said:

Your grammar seems to be.

As long as you understand what I mean I don't give a shit about the Grammar. This isn't an English test. <3

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
  • Author
4 minutes ago, Phentos said:

I wouldn't say that AMD's GPU's are "dying". It's just that Nvidia's products are simply better. At least for now. 

 

Most of AMD's resources went into Ryzen, Threadripper, and Epyc... all three of which are much more important for the overall long-term prospects of the company. Vega was more like a shoe-in to get a product into the high end gaming GPU market. 

 

Navi will be the first GPU architecture that Raja has had full control of, and it's supposed to promise more scalability which would make it follow the same principle as Ryzen CPUs... being modular, completely scalable, and more importantly very cheap to manufacture. Why manufacture a bunch of different die designs when you could manufacture one design and disable parts of it for lower-tier SKUs.

 

Whether or not that will actually help AMD compete more evenly with Nvidia is anybody's guess.

That's exactly the kind of explanation I am looking for. Thank you sir. Hmm, my conclusion is that I don't really like AMD. Feels kinda fragile and fake in a way. Like when you buy a made in china product. Intel/Nvidia feels so much safer and better. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

i suppose you don't have to like them, but the RX 4xx/5xx both perform pretty well for the price when you aren't paying inflated prices from GPU mining induced scarcity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
  • Solution
3 minutes ago, zindan said:

That's exactly the kind of explanation I am looking for. Thank you sir. Hmm, my conclusion is that I don't really like AMD. Feels kinda fragile and fake in a way. Like when you buy a made in china product. Intel/Nvidia feels so much safer and better. 

For pure gaming, Intel/Nvidia are unquestionably superior. Especially when it comes to high refresh rate gaming.

 

However if you do any kind of productivity and/or don't care about high refresh rate gaming, AMD's Ryzen CPUs offer the better value at the moment. Hence why I went with the Ryzen 1700 and sold my 7700K a few months back. 

New Build (The Compromise): CPU - i7 9700K @ 5.1Ghz | Mobo - ASRock Z390 Taichi | RAM - 16GB G.SKILL TridentZ RGB 3200CL14 @ 3466 14-14-14-30 1T | GPU - ASUS Strix GTX 1080 TI | Cooler - Corsair h100i Pro | SSDs - 500 GB 960 EVO + 500 GB 850 EVO + 1TB MX300 | Case - Coolermaster H500 | PSU - EVGA 850 P2 | Monitor - LG 32GK850G-B 144hz 1440p | OS - Windows 10 Pro. 

Peripherals - Corsair K70 Lux RGB | Corsair Scimitar RGB | Audio-technica ATH M50X + Antlion Modmic 5 |

CPU/GPU history: Athlon 6000+/HD4850 > i7 2600k/GTX 580, R9 390, R9 Fury > i7 7700K/R9 Fury, 1080TI > Ryzen 1700/1080TI > i7 9700K/1080TI.

Other tech: Surface Pro 4 (i5/128GB), Lenovo Ideapad Y510P w/ Kali, OnePlus 6T (8G/128G), PS4 Slim.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
15 minutes ago, Kek Ops said:

Holy shit AMD completely BTFO

 

How can they recover from this?

Back to /g/

【=◈︿◈=】

\\ CPU | i7-6700k @ 4.4ghz(1.26v) \\ GPU | 1070 FE 8GB  // Audio | FiiO E10k / AT M50X //

\\ Monitor | LG 29UM69G-B \\ Phone | LG G6 H870DS // Nintendo Switch //

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

To be honest, in my point of view maybe, if AMD Does not focus on more GPU Competitors like the GTX 1080, GTX 1050 Ti and GTX 1080 Ti,  like AMD CPU'S could probably die, but I do not think AMD GPUS Are dying, for now they are doing well, but not great against NVIDIA, but on the CPU Side, they could die...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 3 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing Graphics Cards

×