Is this Pc good?

[Daniel Gorgievski]

I am going to buy this pc  so CPU: Intel I7 7700 3.6ghz up to 4.20ghz GPU:Asus TURBO GTX 1070 8GB Ram: Hyperx fury 16gb 2400mhz ddr4 (Kit of 2)

PSU. Cooler Master GM series 650W  Motherboard:ASUS H110M-R HDD: WD BLACK SSD: Kingston 120GB 

So wil this PC work?

And Will it be powerful? 

And my budget is 1100 dollars!

Thanks

[Anghammarad]

Mainboard won't work the cpu before getting a bios update. If you haven't got a 6xxx intel cpu, you won't be able to do that.

 

Get a 2xx chipset mainboard. Then if standing with Asus, be sure the ram listed in the compatibility list. And a Cooler Master V550 550 watts would be enough.

[Guest]

1. Is it USD

2. Most Kingston SSD are crap

3. Get a B250 or H270 mobo as some H110 and B150 need a BIOS update

4. You don't need a WD Black, Blue is cheaper

5. Turbo is a blower style card, which runs hot and loud, get an open air style like MSI Armor which are usually cheap, Gigabyte G1, Asus Dual...

6. Cooler Master GM isn't particularly good http://www.jonnyguru.com/modules.php?name=NDReviews&op=Story6&reid=430

[Daniel Gorgievski]

9 hours ago, deXxterlab97 said:

1. Is it USD

2. Most Kingston SSD are crap

3. Get a B250 or H270 mobo as some H110 and B150 need a BIOS update

4. You don't need a WD Black, Blue is cheaper

5. Turbo is a blower style card, which runs hot and loud, get an open air style like MSI Armor which are usually cheap, Gigabyte G1, Asus Dual...

6. Cooler Master GM isn't particularly good http://www.jonnyguru.com/modules.php?name=NDReviews&op=Story6&reid=430

 

ASUS PRIME B250-PRO wil this mobo work?

 

[hconverse02]

You choose the case https://pcpartpicker.com/list/DwdZ3F

[Guest]

5 minutes ago, Daniel Gorgievski said:

 

ASUS PRIME B250-PRO wil this mobo work?

 

Yes. Answer my other questions too

[Guest]

3 minutes ago, hconverse02 said:

You choose the case https://pcpartpicker.com/list/DwdZ3F

He doesn't seem to be buying from the US and based on the Asus H110M-R link and his name,  he is buying from Macedonia

[Daniel Gorgievski]

9 hours ago, deXxterlab97 said:

He doesn't seem to be buying from the US and based on the Asus H110M-R link and his name,  he is buying from Macedonia

yes im buying from macedonia 

 

[Gaurav S Rao]

14 minutes ago, deXxterlab97 said:

2. Most Kingston SSD are crap

Absolutely not,I use one in a SATA I Laptop and runs really,really fast,and btw,that SSD cost $50 only (my dad got it as my b'day gift,so I don't tollerate why I have a $20 system for it) and It would definately run well on SATA II and SATA III,and they are 10x faster than 7200 RPM HDD (true what i have experienced)

[TheRandomness]

-Thread moved to New Builds and Planning.

3 minutes ago, Gaurav S Rao said:

Absolutely not,I use one in a SATA I Laptop and runs really,really fast,and btw,that SSD cost $50 only (my dad got it as my b'day gift,so I don't tollerate why I have a $20 system for it) and It would definately run well on SATA II and SATA III,and they are 10x faster than 7200 RPM HDD (true what i have experienced)

He says that due to the fact that the SSDNow V300 series was originally shipped with an awful controller, and therefore it wasn't much faster than a HDD at all.

[Guest]

1 minute ago, Gaurav S Rao said:

Absolutely not,I use one in a SATA I Laptop and runs really,really fast,and btw,that SSD cost $50 only (my dad got it as my b'day gift,so I don't tollerate why I have a $20 system for it) and It would definately run well on SATA II and SATA III,and they are 10x faster than 7200 RPM HDD (true what i have experienced)

Proof of it? 10 times faster in what? You can't just throw random numbers.

@Droidbot

 

If you don't have any proof it then let me show some proof of mine

http://www.anandtech.com/show/7763/an-update-to-kingston-ssdnow-v300-a-switch-to-slower-micron-nand

http://www.legitreviews.com/kingston-uv400-480gb-tlc-ssd-review_182149/11

 

[Gaurav S Rao]

8 minutes ago, deXxterlab97 said:

Proof of it? 10 times faster in what? You can't just throw random numbers.

@Droidbot

 

If you don't have any proof it then let me show some proof of mine

http://www.anandtech.com/show/7763/an-update-to-kingston-ssdnow-v300-a-switch-to-slower-micron-nand

http://www.legitreviews.com/kingston-uv400-480gb-tlc-ssd-review_182149/11

 

Actually my SSD is a UV400,but you said "Almost all Kingston SSD's are crap" not just "The V300 series is crap"

[Gaurav S Rao]

10 minutes ago, TheRandomness said:

-Thread moved to New Builds and Planning.

He says that due to the fact that the SSDNow V300 series was originally shipped with an awful controller, and therefore it wasn't much faster than a HDD at all.

Well,that is specific to the V300,not all "Kingston SSD's" what @deXxterlab97 said.

[Gaurav S Rao]

13 minutes ago, deXxterlab97 said:

Proof of it? 10 times faster in what? You can't just throw random numbers.

@Droidbot

 

If you don't have any proof it then let me show some proof of mine

http://www.anandtech.com/show/7763/an-update-to-kingston-ssdnow-v300-a-switch-to-slower-micron-nand

http://www.legitreviews.com/kingston-uv400-480gb-tlc-ssd-review_182149/11

 

And what is wrong with the UV400?It is a excellant choice , and a 120 GB is cheap,including the other ones like 240 GB,but how is it "Crap",Compare that to a $50-70 HDD and then say me,I know more storage on the HDD,but thats how SSD's are sort of ment,You ain't paying for that $1000 on that 4 TB 850 Evo and getting a 4 TB HDD for around $100,its the same right? IT IS RIGHT?

 

*TRIGGERED* *FACE PALM*

[Daniel Gorgievski]

I am going to buy this pc  so CPU: Intel i7-7700K 4.2 GHz up to 4.5 GHzGPU:Asus TURBO GTX 1070 8GB Ram: Hyperx fury 16gb 2400mhz ddr4 (Kit of 2)

PSU. Cooler Master GM series 650W  Motherboard: ASUS PRIME B250-PRO HDD: WD BLACK SSD: Kingston 120GB 

So wil this PC work?

And Will it be powerful? 

THIS IS MY FINALL CHOICE!

[Tiwaz]

1 minute ago, Daniel Gorgievski said:

I am going to buy this pc  so CPU: Intel i7-7700K 4.2 GHz up to 4.5 GHzGPU:Asus TURBO GTX 1070 8GB Ram: Hyperx fury 16gb 2400mhz ddr4 (Kit of 2)

PSU. Cooler Master GM series 650W  Motherboard: ASUS PRIME B250-PRO HDD: WD BLACK SSD: Kingston 120GB 

So wil this PC work?

And Will it be powerful? 

THIS IS MY FINALL CHOICE!

get a 250gb SSD if u can and a WD BLUE 1TB

[Thony]

Does B250 support OC ?

[Princess Luna]

Get the i7 7700 since you won't OC, get a h110m motherboard and stock cooler to save up for a second hand GTX 1080 for better performance.

[WkdPaul]

Threads merged.

 

Please note that posting multiple threads like this is against the Community Standards.

[Guest]

1 hour ago, Gaurav S Rao said:

And what is wrong with the UV400?It is a excellant choice , and a 120 GB is cheap,including the other ones like 240 GB,but how is it "Crap",Compare that to a $50-70 HDD and then say me,I know more storage on the HDD,but thats how SSD's are sort of ment,You ain't paying for that $1000 on that 4 TB 850 Evo and getting a 4 TB HDD for around $100,its the same right? IT IS RIGHT?

 

*TRIGGERED* *FACE PALM*

Facepalm?

 

You can't just start a debate with me and expect to win without showing any proof. Also learn how to write proper sentences, might be useful too

 

1 hour ago, Gaurav S Rao said:

And what is wrong with the UV400?It is a excellant choice , and a 120 GB is cheap,including the other ones like 240 GB,but how is it "Crap",Compare that to a $50-70 HDD and then say me,I know more storage on the HDD,but thats how SSD's are sort of ment,You ain't paying for that $1000 on that 4 TB 850 Evo and getting a 4 TB HDD for around $100,its the same right? IT IS RIGHT?

 

*TRIGGERED* *FACE PALM*

First off, I never said anyone to get 4TB SSD

Second off, UV 400 is very shit in performance. Sure let's pay $5 less for a shitty SSD while we can get something better

 

Third, UV400 is bad. As evidenced by these results. Just because you have it doesn't mean it is good.

I doubt you haven't done any extensive benchmarks to come up with that bullcrap you just wrote. Of course an SSD is faster than a HDD, I am saying is that it is one of the worst SSD out there.

 

 

[DocSwag]

13 minutes ago, deXxterlab97 said:

-snip-

Dex, don't forget about this

http://www.thessdreview.com/featured/kingston-ssdnow-uv400-ssd-review-480gb/5/

When it's slower than an hdd...

 

Granted, these are sequentials and not randoms, where the uv400 would win, but still. Kinda sad.

[Droidbot]

uv400 isnt total shit

but it's bad value

considering that SL308 and other drives hover around $5 more than it. I'd rather pay the $5 for the better performance. 

[Gaurav S Rao]

On 6/8/2017 at 6:57 PM, deXxterlab97 said:

Facepalm?

 

You can't just start a debate with me and expect to win without showing any proof. Also learn how to write proper sentences, might be useful too

 

First off, I never said anyone to get 4TB SSD

Second off, UV 400 is very shit in performance. Sure let's pay $5 less for a shitty SSD while we can get something better

 

Third, UV400 is bad. As evidenced by these results. Just because you have it doesn't mean it is good.

I doubt you haven't done any extensive benchmarks to come up with that bullcrap you just wrote. Of course an SSD is faster than a HDD, I am saying is that it is one of the worst SSD out there.

 

 

And I never said it is the best SSD since I have it,and it might seem a bad value,but it is atleast faster than a HDD

 

On 6/8/2017 at 4:38 PM, deXxterlab97 said:

2. Most Kingston SSD are crap

and that is what you said at first and now,you say it is a bad value? Why does Linus use Kingston SSD's,Why did Austin use the UV400 120 GB (or if it was the UV400) In his $500 Budget Build,and no-one needs a computer as fast as lightning,and if you do,learn to be patient,and a faster SSD wouldn't show a significant difference in day-to-day tasks at all,I have been argued with using a NVME SSD in a thread for someone else's new build planning and for that SAME DAMN REASON! And those are "Benchmarks" and do not express the general usability and performance,they do it it specific scenarios like Graphics and all that other jazz,but with the Storage benchmarks,they basically always express something someone might not need to do that often like copying a file/or with big files,Will anyone even need to do that every second/minute/hour (Well I basically do that thing I mentioned once I start it and I don't stop,but I'm a idiot and keep on messing stuff up,or try a experiment,etc which is a waste of time) so who will do that stuff so often? and those numbers will change as time goes on and the drive will anyway slow down,when a lot of read-write cycles are done/or even if the drive is failing it will become slow and it is not like gonna happen to a particular SSD,it will happen to all SSD/HDD,and all tech,etc

[Droidbot]

2 hours ago, Gaurav S Rao said:

 

and that is what you said at first and now,you say it is a bad value? Why does Linus use Kingston SSD's

because he gets paid to show them? 

2 hours ago, Gaurav S Rao said:

Why did Austin use the UV400 120 GB (or if it was the UV400) In his $500 Budget Build

Because it's cheap and he's uneducated

2 hours ago, Gaurav S Rao said:

and no-one needs a computer as fast as lightning,and if you do,learn to be patient,and a faster SSD wouldn't show a significant difference in day-to-day tasks at all,I have been argued with using a NVME SSD in a thread for someone else's new build planning and for that SAME DAMN REASON! 

the thing is that most people are buying a cheap 240GB SSD - why not spend $5 more and get more performance? 

while there is huge gains from 100-300MB/s in real world performance, there is not much from 300-500, and even less from 500+

2 hours ago, Gaurav S Rao said:

And those are "Benchmarks" and do not express the general usability and performance,they do it it specific scenarios like Graphics and all that other jazz,but with the Storage benchmarks,they basically always express something someone might not need to do that often like copying a file/or with big files,Will anyone even need to do that every second/minute/hour (Well I basically do that thing I mentioned once I start it and I don't stop,but I'm a idiot and keep on messing stuff up,or try a experiment,etc which is a waste of time) so who will do that stuff so often? and those numbers will change as time goes on and the drive will anyway slow down,when a lot of read-write cycles are done/or even if the drive is failing it will become slow and it is not like gonna happen to a particular SSD,it will happen to all SSD/HDD,and all tech,etc

 

4k read/writes = real world perf

 

why not have faster copies, etc by buying a better SSD?