Jump to content

Have you considered building a custom NAS? It will give you a lot more room to grow and customizability and while costing less and giving you more performance. 

PSU Tier List | CoC

Gaming Build | FreeNAS Server

Spoiler

i5-4690k || Seidon 240m || GTX780 ACX || MSI Z97s SLI Plus || 8GB 2400mhz || 250GB 840 Evo || 1TB WD Blue || H440 (Black/Blue) || Windows 10 Pro || Dell P2414H & BenQ XL2411Z || Ducky Shine Mini || Logitech G502 Proteus Core

Spoiler

FreeNAS 9.3 - Stable || Xeon E3 1230v2 || Supermicro X9SCM-F || 32GB Crucial ECC DDR3 || 3x4TB WD Red (JBOD) || SYBA SI-PEX40064 sata controller || Corsair CX500m || NZXT Source 210.

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/775993-qnap-vs-synology/#findComment-9788582
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would say the Synology is far better in terms of software. They have their QuickConnect service that allows you to access everything on it without needing to do any port forwarding, and the interface is 10/10. Security wise, both models probably tie. They are both linux based, and both get regular updates. I would recommend going with Synology.

 

People here will of course recommend building your own NAS, but it is tedious in the long run, and does not have the same ease-of-use as products like Synology and Qnap do. Building your own NAS is mainly for tinkerers IMO.

My native language is C++

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/775993-qnap-vs-synology/#findComment-9788600
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, apaar123 said:

Custom nas?

As in, build a PC and run FreeNAS or some other NAS OS. 

PSU Tier List | CoC

Gaming Build | FreeNAS Server

Spoiler

i5-4690k || Seidon 240m || GTX780 ACX || MSI Z97s SLI Plus || 8GB 2400mhz || 250GB 840 Evo || 1TB WD Blue || H440 (Black/Blue) || Windows 10 Pro || Dell P2414H & BenQ XL2411Z || Ducky Shine Mini || Logitech G502 Proteus Core

Spoiler

FreeNAS 9.3 - Stable || Xeon E3 1230v2 || Supermicro X9SCM-F || 32GB Crucial ECC DDR3 || 3x4TB WD Red (JBOD) || SYBA SI-PEX40064 sata controller || Corsair CX500m || NZXT Source 210.

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/775993-qnap-vs-synology/#findComment-9788612
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, tt2468 said:

I would say the Synology is far better in terms of software. They have their QuickConnect service that allows you to access everything on it without needing to do any port forwarding, and the interface is 10/10.

Pretty sure QNAP has this too? Been a while since I've used one now.

 

@apaar123

Most NAS's have backup to cloud options like to BackBlaze which is cheaper and more reliable than you could do yourself another way, not to equivalent resiliency anyway.

 

I've always gone with QNAP over Synology since usually for the same price you get higher spec hardware and software on both is very good. I've always used them as iSCSI targets for Windows Backup/DPM/vDP though so it's a configure once never login again use case so the extra hardware performance is more important than slightly better software features or usability.

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/775993-qnap-vs-synology/#findComment-9788656
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

i am going to jump on the custom NAS bandwagon. The reality is to back up multimedia requires multiple drives so another computer gives you PCI slots to upgrade storage later and puts you in control of the software. You get to use cool technologies like ZFS or BTRFS, and new technology comes out you get better upgrade options

 

             ☼

ψ ︿_____︿_ψ_   

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/775993-qnap-vs-synology/#findComment-9788661
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×