Jump to content

What are Intel Xeons used for?

I'm not familiar with this series. They look kinda obsolete but I have no idea. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Server grade CPUs. More cache, cores, threads, better server software support, fancy raid/IO solutions, ECC ram/more ram, etc

Ryzen 5 3600 stock | 2x16GB C13 3200MHz (AFR) | GTX 760 (Sold the VII)| ASUS Prime X570-P | 6TB WD Gold (128MB Cache, 2017)

Samsung 850 EVO 240 GB 

138 is a good number.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Server chips. 4-22 cores, significantly more cache, special instruction set features, fancy IO (including optane), very good ECC support and dual/quad CPU support

idk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are also used for high end workstations which require a lot of computational power.

Devices:

Desktop(s): Main Rig | CPU: R7 1700x, Ram: 16GB, GPU: GTX 1070 Ti

Server(s): My Server 

Laptop(s): Macbook Pro 13" (2015) 

Phone(s): iPhone SE (64GB), Nokia Lumia 925 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Droidbot said:

Server chips. 4-22 cores, significantly more cache, special instruction set features, fancy IO (including optane), very good ECC support and dual/quad CPU support

Server chips... so are they any good for gaming? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Servers. And they're nowhere near obsolete. They are some of the most powerful CPUs these days. 

Main System: Phobos

AMD Ryzen 7 2700 (8C/16T), ASRock B450 Steel Legend, 16GB G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3000MHz, AMD Radeon RX 570 4GB (XFX), 960GB Crucial M500, 2TB Seagate BarraCuda, Windows 10 Pro for Workstations/macOS Catalina

 

Secondary System: York

Intel Core i7-2600 (4C/8T), ASUS P8Z68-V/GEN3, 16GB GEIL Enhance Corsa DDR3 1600MHz, Zotac GeForce GTX 550 Ti 1GB, 240GB ADATA Ultimate SU650, Windows 10 Pro for Workstations

 

Older File Server: Yet to be named

Intel Pentium 4 HT (1C/2T), Intel D865GBF, 3GB DDR 400MHz, ATI Radeon HD 4650 1GB (HIS), 80GB WD Caviar, 320GB Hitachi Deskstar, Windows XP Pro SP3, Windows Server 2003 R2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, KrazyforOnce said:

Server chips... so are they any good for gaming? 

Sometimes, but not usually. They're way overpriced for that. 

Main System: Phobos

AMD Ryzen 7 2700 (8C/16T), ASRock B450 Steel Legend, 16GB G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3000MHz, AMD Radeon RX 570 4GB (XFX), 960GB Crucial M500, 2TB Seagate BarraCuda, Windows 10 Pro for Workstations/macOS Catalina

 

Secondary System: York

Intel Core i7-2600 (4C/8T), ASUS P8Z68-V/GEN3, 16GB GEIL Enhance Corsa DDR3 1600MHz, Zotac GeForce GTX 550 Ti 1GB, 240GB ADATA Ultimate SU650, Windows 10 Pro for Workstations

 

Older File Server: Yet to be named

Intel Pentium 4 HT (1C/2T), Intel D865GBF, 3GB DDR 400MHz, ATI Radeon HD 4650 1GB (HIS), 80GB WD Caviar, 320GB Hitachi Deskstar, Windows XP Pro SP3, Windows Server 2003 R2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, KrazyforOnce said:

Server chips... so are they any good for gaming? 

Nope. You don't realistically need more than 4 cores for gaming and the amount of cores they have means a lower clock speed for all of them - meaning lower single-core performance. 

idk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also, they are a good way of upgrading older PC's

 

I swapped my core i7 920 for a Xeon x5650, 2 more cores...but much better single core improvement

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Droidbot said:

Nope. You don't realistically need more than 4 cores for gaming and the amount of cores they have means a lower clock speed for all of them - meaning lower single-core performance. 

Ok thanks! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, BubblyCharizard said:

Also, they are a good way of upgrading older PC's

 

I swapped my core i7 920 for a Xeon x5650, 2 more cores...but much better single core improvement

Yeah, the 1366 Xeons are amazing value especially when OC'd. Pretty much on par with a modern 6 core when pushed

idk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Droidbot said:

Yeah, the 1366 Xeons are amazing value especially when OC'd. Pretty much on par with a modern 6 core when pushed

Could these Xeons be a workstation CPU?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, KrazyforOnce said:

Could these Xeons be a workstation CPU?

Yeah. They could

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Usually used in servers. Like this forum. It probably uses Xeon processors in it unless it's using the AMD equivalent (I believe they're called Opteron). Xeons run at a lower clock frequency, have a lower TDP than a desktop equivalent but tend to have more cores in them for extreme multi threaded workloads like having 1,000's upon millions of requests from multiple clients like the very server were logged into right now. Plus it has the perks of support for error correcting memory and more cache than desktop variants as others have stated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, KrazyforOnce said:

Could these Xeons be a workstation CPU?

There is Xeon Workstation chips, namely the old W series and new 1600 series

idk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Windows7ge said:

Usually used in servers. Like this forum. It probably uses Xeon processors in it unless it's using the AMD equivalent (I believe they're called Opteron). Xeons run at a lower clock frequency, have a lower TDP than a desktop equivalent but tend to have more cores in them for extreme multi threaded workloads like having 1,000's upon millions of requests from multiple clients like the very server were logged into right now. Plus it has the perks of support for error correcting memory and more cache than desktop variants as others have stated.

Lower TDP? Hell no. They're 120-165w chips.. 

idk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Droidbot said:

Lower TDP? Hell no. They're 120-165w chips.. 

In New Zealand, the most expensive Xeon chip is the Intel Xeon E5-2699. Priced at $6449. Costing more than my mums and brothers car combined!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, KrazyforOnce said:

In New Zealand, the most expensive Xeon chip is the Intel Xeon E5-2699. Priced at $6449. Costing more than my mums and brothers car combined!!!

Because it has 22 freaking cores on one chip.. businesses have that sort of money

idk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Droidbot said:

Because it has 22 freaking cores on one chip.. businesses have that sort of money

22 Cores! WOW!!! I can have millions of porn pages on screen 24/7! Thats ear rape, LITERALLY 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Droidbot said:

Lower TDP? Hell no. They're 120-165w chips.. 

Jeeze calm down. It depends what you compare them to. Take a 4 core 8  thread desktop CPU and compare its TDP to a 4 core 8 thread xeon. Generally the Xeon at a lower clock speed has a lower TDP. Of course some Xeons are exceptions to this like in my dual E5-2670 server. Both CPUs have a tdp rating very close to a 3930K. It depends on the chips being compared but the tdp of a Xeon is usually less than a comparable desktop chip in terms of core/thread count.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

@KrazyforOnce There are systems with many more cores running than those. Especially once your running multiple sockets of CPUs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Windows7ge said:

Jeeze calm down. It depends what you compare them to. Take a 4 core 8  thread desktop CPU and compare its TDP to a 4 core 8 thread xeon. Generally the Xeon at a lower clock speed has a lower TDP. Of course some Xeons are exceptions to this like in my dual E5-2670 server. Both CPUs have a tdp rating very close to a 3930K. It depends on the chips being compared but the tdp of a Xeon is usually less than a comparable desktop chip in terms of core/thread count.

Of course, but besides the L series chips, modern Xeons are higher power than their desktop counterparts. Compare the E5 1600 v4 series for example, where a 4c/8t chip (1630v4) is 140w.. and the PCH consumes 500mW more than the normal 6w PCH on Sky/Kabylake :P

idk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, KrazyforOnce said:

Server chips... so are they any good for gaming? 

The xeons from consumer sockets like the e3 xeons will perform pretty much exactly as their i5/7 counterparts and thus still be good for gaming. Some xeons from other sockets may have slow clockspeeds(closer to 2ghz) that aren't very good for gaming. 

 

CPU: AMD Ryzen 5 5600X Heatsink: Gelid Phantom Black GPU: Palit RTX 3060 Ti Dual RAM: Corsair DDR4 2x8GB 3000Mhz mobo: Asus X570-P case: Fractal Design Define C PSU: Superflower Leadex Gold 650W

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×