Jump to content

6700k delid before & after results

xYowie

I decided to delid my 6700k and here are my results.

My cooler is the noctua d15s.

 

Before temps running prime95 max heat:

core0: 91c

core1: 92c

core2: 91c

core3: 91c

After delid with noctua nt-h1 tim:

core0: 83c

core1: 86c

core2: 81c

core3: 82c

 

This is how i applied the paste:

file-99652f3862b277b512.jpg

 

Looks like intel uses pretty trashy stuff.

I've noticed the core difference is bigger i reapplied the tim on the die one more time to make sure it wasn't my fault and got the same results.

It's not as scary as people say it is, in my opinion it's worth it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you only saw a 10C drop did you use good thermal paste on it? People have seen a lot higher drops then just that, up to 20C or so.

 

 •E5-2670 @2.7GHz • Intel DX79SI • EVGA 970 SSC• GSkill Sniper 8Gb ddr3 • Corsair Spec 02 • Corsair RM750 • HyperX 120Gb SSD • Hitachi 2Tb HDD •

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, xYowie said:

Looks like intel uses pretty trashy stuff.

No, the reason you saw gains, was due the gap between the CPU and HIS was made smaller (removal of glue). If you used liquid metal as your paste, then you'd see a great improvement, you probably used more or less the same quality stuff as Intel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you apply enough paste?

Intel i7 7700K | MSI Z270 Gaming M3 | MSI GTX 1070 Gaming X| Corsair Vengeance LPX 2x8GB DDR4 3000Mhz Samsung EVO 850 250GB | WD Blue 1TB | Corsair CS650M | Thermalright Macho Rev. A | NZXT S340

CM Storm Quickfire TK [MX Blues] | Zowie FK1 |  Kingston HyperX Cloud

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Those temps sound awfully high... what clock/voltage is it running at?

Gaming system: R7 7800X3D, Asus ROG Strix B650E-F Gaming Wifi, Thermalright Phantom Spirit 120 SE ARGB, Corsair Vengeance 2x 32GB 6000C30, RTX 4070, MSI MPG A850G, Fractal Design North, Samsung 990 Pro 2TB, Acer Predator XB241YU 24" 1440p 144Hz G-Sync + HP LP2475w 24" 1200p 60Hz wide gamut
Productivity system: i9-7980XE, Asus X299 TUF mark 2, Noctua D15, 64GB ram (mixed), RTX 3070, NZXT E850, GameMax Abyss, Samsung 980 Pro 2TB, random 1080p + 720p displays.
Gaming laptop: Lenovo Legion 5, 5800H, RTX 3070, Kingston DDR4 3200C22 2x16GB 2Rx8, Kingston Fury Renegade 1TB + Crucial P1 1TB SSD, 165 Hz IPS 1080p G-Sync Compatible

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

The CPU should be fully covered with paste, preferably doing it manually. There CAN NOT be spaces without paste, you shouldn't apply the same method as with the HIS and cooler.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Matu20 said:

No, the reason you saw gains, was due the gap between the CPU and HIS was made smaller (removal of glue). If you used liquid metal as your paste, then you'd see a great improvement, you probably used more or less the same quality stuff as Intel.

 

Assuming one used a liquid metal TIM, it's better to have the IHS floating, rather than re-adhering it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, cajjpants said:

Assuming one used a liquid metal TIM, it's better to have the IHS floating, rather than re-adhering it?

Yes, glue will not let it make perfect contact.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×