Jump to content

4790k oc to match 6700k

How far would I have to oc my 4790k to match a 6700k at say 4.6ghz

AMD (and proud) r7 1700 4ghz- 

also (1600) 

asus rog crosshairs vi hero x370-

MSI 980ti G6 1506mhz slix2 -

h110 pull - acer xb270hu 1440p -

 corsair 750D - corsair 16gb 2933

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, jjohnthedon1 said:

How far would I have to oc my 4790k to match a 6700k at say 4.6ghz

 

You're going to need between 4.8 and 4.9 to match it.  The IPC difference is over 200 MHz, but not quite 300 MHz.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

maybe 4.8, 4.9? Honestly not much of a difference...

Main Rig: R9 5950X @ PBO, RTX 3090, 64 GB DDR4 3666, InWin 101, Full Hardline Watercooling

Server: R7 1700X @ 4.0 GHz, GTX 1080 Ti, 32GB DDR4 3000, Cooler Master NR200P, Full Soft Watercooling

LAN Rig: R5 3600X @ PBO, RTX 2070, 32 GB DDR4 3200, Dan Case A4-SFV V4, 120mm AIO for the CPU

HTPC: i7-7700K @ 4.6 GHz, GTX 1050 Ti, 16 GB DDR4 3200, AliExpress K39, IS-47K Cooler

Router: R3 2200G @ stock, 4GB DDR4 2400, what are cases, stock cooler
 

I don't have a problem...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

you want a 4790k to perform as well as a 6700k that is at 4.6?

 

You're gonna need liquid nitrogen for that. I'm too lazy to do the maths, but I'm gonna say over 5.0ghz at least.

When in doubt, re-format.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, jjohnthedon1 said:

How far would I have to oc my 4790k to match a 6700k at say 4.6ghz

About a 5% IPC improvement from Haswell so 4.6GHz*.05=.23, so around 4.83GHz? Give or take a bit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

About 4.65GHz to 4.7GHz, clock for clock, the 6700K is a piss poor improvement over the 4790K. Under a good selection of scenarios, the two chips are equals. It's optimizations in Skylake that give it an edge in some other scenarios.

Come Bloody Angel

Break off your chains

And look what I've found in the dirt.

 

Pale battered body

Seems she was struggling

Something is wrong with this world.

 

Fierce Bloody Angel

The blood is on your hands

Why did you come to this world?

 

Everybody turns to dust.

 

Everybody turns to dust.

 

The blood is on your hands.

 

The blood is on your hands!

 

Pyo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

So my cpu is far from bottlenecking or being obsolete 

AMD (and proud) r7 1700 4ghz- 

also (1600) 

asus rog crosshairs vi hero x370-

MSI 980ti G6 1506mhz slix2 -

h110 pull - acer xb270hu 1440p -

 corsair 750D - corsair 16gb 2933

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, jjohnthedon1 said:

So my cpu is far from bottlenecking or being obsolete 

 

Absolutely.  If you are running at 4.7 GHz, your CPU is performing roughly the same as a 6700k at 4.5 or slightly lower.  You're solid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

At 4.5-4.6 i get the same speeds if not slightly faster than the 6700k running at stock (4.2 Turbo) so from what i see its 300-500mhz. Not too shabby at all. 

Chicken Nuggets

CPU - i7-4790k | CPU Cooler - Custom Loop | Motherboard -  MSI Z97 Gaming 5 | RAM - Mushkin Redline (2x4GB) 2400Mhz   Graphics Card - GTX Titan X(Maxwell)  | Power Supply - Super Flower 80+ Gold 650w Storage - Samsung 840 Evo 256gb + 750 Seagate Hybrid + 1TB WD Green + Raid 0 4X500GB + Raid 1 500GB HDD Case - HAF-X | Colour Theme - Orange & Black | Monitor - ACER Predator x34 Overclock to 100hz

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

The answer is not simply Skylake = 1.05*Haswell.

 

Digital Foundry has done some really great work showing how the different CPUs compare in different games. We see quite a significant difference between CPU generations, using the same GPU.  Check this out:

 

 

i7 4790k @4.7 | GTX 1070 Strix | Z97 Sabertooth | 32GB  DDR3 2400 mhz | Intel 750 SSD | Define R5 | Corsair K70 | Steel Series Rival | XB271, 1440p, IPS, 165hz | 5.1 Surround
PC Build

Desk Build

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, CostcoSamples said:

The answer is not simply Skylake = 1.05*Haswell.

 

Digital Foundry has done some really great work showing how the different CPUs compare in different games. We see quite a significant difference between CPU generations, using the same GPU.  Check this out:

 

 

This is good but it's a stock 4790k which is at 4.1ghz when all cores are under full load 

AMD (and proud) r7 1700 4ghz- 

also (1600) 

asus rog crosshairs vi hero x370-

MSI 980ti G6 1506mhz slix2 -

h110 pull - acer xb270hu 1440p -

 corsair 750D - corsair 16gb 2933

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, CostcoSamples said:

The answer is not simply Skylake = 1.05*Haswell.

 

Digital Foundry has done some really great work showing how the different CPUs compare in different games. We see quite a significant difference between CPU generations, using the same GPU.  Check this out:

 

 

What would have been nice is if they clocked all the CPUs down to 2 ghz to force a cpu bottleneck 

and then showed the difference between the architectures 

AMD (and proud) r7 1700 4ghz- 

also (1600) 

asus rog crosshairs vi hero x370-

MSI 980ti G6 1506mhz slix2 -

h110 pull - acer xb270hu 1440p -

 corsair 750D - corsair 16gb 2933

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, jjohnthedon1 said:

What would have been nice is if they clocked all the CPUs down to 2 ghz to force a cpu bottleneck 

and then showed the difference between the architectures 

yeah that would be nice.  There are a lot of ways you could tease out the differences between CPUs.  As it is, the Digital Foundry videos represent a huge undertaking to synchronize the benchmarks and show the graphs in real time.  Pretty damn awesome if you ask me!  It's kind of a shame that most of it is on cutscenes rather than actual game play.  You'd have to write a program to play the game exactly the same each time through, so I understand why he didn't do that.

i7 4790k @4.7 | GTX 1070 Strix | Z97 Sabertooth | 32GB  DDR3 2400 mhz | Intel 750 SSD | Define R5 | Corsair K70 | Steel Series Rival | XB271, 1440p, IPS, 165hz | 5.1 Surround
PC Build

Desk Build

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, jjohnthedon1 said:

What would have been nice is if they clocked all the CPUs down to 2 ghz to force a cpu bottleneck 

and then showed the difference between the architectures 

 

I'm actually not too impressed with several of Digital Foundry's videos.  On more than one occasion he's compared CPUs at different clock speeds attempting to imply an advantage of one over another.  In the cases where one wouldn't clock as high as another you'd think that he would just run them all at a lower equal overclocks, but he doesn't. In the case of this particular video, why include the overclocked 6700k at all?  If you are going to compare chips, show them all at stock or show them all at the same overclocked speed.

 

In addition, in all of his videos you're left to assume that the same supporting enhancements (cache speed, mem speed and so on) have been made across all platforms.  This is a common problem with a lot of reviewers on YouTube.  We're just supposed to assume that all things were equal during testing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok 

3 hours ago, done12many2 said:

 

I'm actually not too impressed with several of Digital Foundry's videos.  On more than one occasion he's compared CPUs at different clock speeds attempting to imply an advantage of one over another.  In the cases where one wouldn't clock as high as another you'd think that he would just run them all at a lower equal overclocks, but he doesn't. In the case of this particular video, why include the overclocked 6700k at all?  If you are going to compare chips, show them all at stock or show them all at the same overclocked speed.

 

In addition, in all of his videos you're left to assume that the same supporting enhancements (cache speed, mem speed and so on) have been made across all platforms.  This is a common problem with a lot of reviewers on YouTube.  We're just supposed to assume that all things were equal during testing.

Ok so my cousin had a i5 6500 

same ram as me but drr4 

runningb at 2400mhZ.    

I clocked mine to the same as his and disabled hyperthreading so we're esentualy both quad cores at the same speed one haswell one skylake ran a few benches with my 980ti at 720p low to eliviate and gpu bottlenecking.

both CPUs ran at 100 percent load in shadows of mordor, gtav

and rise of the tomb raider 

and skylake beat haswell by 5-7 frames, however every test was in the high 100's / low 200's. 

Gpu load was in the 60's 

so I guess I bottlenecked the CPUs and there was no gpu bottle neck and the results were minimal,

there was about 20 fps in the farcry primal bench but 170 and 190 so nothing to really consider 

had a fun afternoon testing and basically answered my own question

skylake is better but not by a fat lot 

 

 

AMD (and proud) r7 1700 4ghz- 

also (1600) 

asus rog crosshairs vi hero x370-

MSI 980ti G6 1506mhz slix2 -

h110 pull - acer xb270hu 1440p -

 corsair 750D - corsair 16gb 2933

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×