Jump to content

i3 6100, good enough for Battlefield 1?

the MBK
 Share
Posted

So I just ordered my new RX 480 and I thought a CPU upgrade would be a good thing.

I really don't have the money for a 6600k, so I thoght I might get the 6100 now and upgrade to the new Kaby Lake i7 later. But is the i3 good for good enough for not bottlenecking my RX 480 8GB, especially in the next 2 years.

The most CPU intensive games I play are Battlefield 1 and Witcher 3.

i5 6500 @3.2Ghz, Zotac GTX 1080 Ti Mini, 16GB DDR4 @2400Mhz, 240GB SSD, 1TB HDD, Corsair Vengance 650W, Asus Z170 Pro Gaming, Thermaltake Versa U21, Hyper 103

AOC Agon AG271UG 27" 4k G-Sync, G933, G502, G801

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
1 minute ago, the MBK said:

So I just ordered my new RX 480 and I thought a CPU upgrade would be a good thing.

I really don't have the money for a 6600k, so I thoght I might get the 6100 now and upgrade to the new Kaby Lake i7 later. But is the i3 good for good enough for not bottlenecking my RX 480 8GB, especially in the next 2 years.

The most CPU intensive games I play are Battlefield 1 and Witcher 3.

That's gonna struggle a bit... Can you get a 6500 at least ?

CPU: Intel i7 7700K | GPU: ROG Strix GTX 1080Ti | PSU: Seasonic X-1250 (faulty) | Memory: Corsair Vengeance RGB 3200Mhz 16GB | OS Drive: Western Digital Black NVMe 250GB | Game Drive(s): Samsung 970 Evo 500GB, Hitachi 7K3000 3TB 3.5" | Motherboard: Gigabyte Z270x Gaming 7 | Case: Fractal Design Define S (No Window and modded front Panel) | Monitor(s): Dell S2716DG G-Sync 144Hz, Acer R240HY 60Hz (Dead) | Keyboard: G.SKILL RIPJAWS KM780R MX | Mouse: Steelseries Sensei 310 (Striked out parts are sold or dead, awaiting zen2 parts)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
  • Author

Well, my budget isn't that big. Maybe a 6400 would just fit in there.

i5 6500 @3.2Ghz, Zotac GTX 1080 Ti Mini, 16GB DDR4 @2400Mhz, 240GB SSD, 1TB HDD, Corsair Vengance 650W, Asus Z170 Pro Gaming, Thermaltake Versa U21, Hyper 103

AOC Agon AG271UG 27" 4k G-Sync, G933, G502, G801

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
3 minutes ago, the MBK said:

Well, my budget isn't that big. Maybe a 6400 would just fit in there.

When it comes to the i5's in this gen the 6500 is the sweet spot in terms of price and the performance you get... 6400 is meh for the money and the 6600k gets it's ass handed to it by the stock 6700 so that's in a bad spot.

CPU: Intel i7 7700K | GPU: ROG Strix GTX 1080Ti | PSU: Seasonic X-1250 (faulty) | Memory: Corsair Vengeance RGB 3200Mhz 16GB | OS Drive: Western Digital Black NVMe 250GB | Game Drive(s): Samsung 970 Evo 500GB, Hitachi 7K3000 3TB 3.5" | Motherboard: Gigabyte Z270x Gaming 7 | Case: Fractal Design Define S (No Window and modded front Panel) | Monitor(s): Dell S2716DG G-Sync 144Hz, Acer R240HY 60Hz (Dead) | Keyboard: G.SKILL RIPJAWS KM780R MX | Mouse: Steelseries Sensei 310 (Striked out parts are sold or dead, awaiting zen2 parts)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
4 minutes ago, frozeNNN said:

Try to get i5 6400. i3 will do the job but you will notice 10-15% of bottleneck in those games

damn ...

that...

avatar....

pic....

can't....

stop.....

looking....

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
1 minute ago, ItsTheDuckAgain said:

damn ...

that...

avatar....

pic....

can't....

stop.....

looking....

Shhh i stole it from some user from this forum...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

I5 6400 would be the way to go. Just look at some benchmarks on YouTube and you will see that it actually makes a big difference between the 6100 and 6400

Also i7 kaby lake would be overkill for an RX 480 unless you will also use it for editing etc (even i7 6700k is overkill for gaming nowadays)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
  • Author
3 minutes ago, Mobby Dick said:

I5 6400 would be the way to go. Just look at some benchmarks on YouTube and you will see that it actually makes a big difference between the 6100 and 6400

Also i7 kaby lake would be overkill for an RX 480 unless you will also use it for editing etc (even i7 6700k is overkill for gaming nowadays)

Well, you guessed it. I want to do some editing in the future, but my current PC can't handle it. And of course I will upgrade my GPU to a 1170,

or whatever, when I get the new CPU.

5 minutes ago, SirFlamenco said:

6700 is better than 6600k overclocked

Well, not for gaming.

i5 6500 @3.2Ghz, Zotac GTX 1080 Ti Mini, 16GB DDR4 @2400Mhz, 240GB SSD, 1TB HDD, Corsair Vengance 650W, Asus Z170 Pro Gaming, Thermaltake Versa U21, Hyper 103

AOC Agon AG271UG 27" 4k G-Sync, G933, G502, G801

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
53 minutes ago, XenosTech said:

When it comes to the i5's in this gen the 6500 is the sweet spot in terms of price and the performance you get... 6400 is meh for the money and the 6600k gets it's ass handed to it by the stock 6700 so that's in a bad spot.

Not exactly a true statement anymore. The 6400 is down to $174, and the 6500 is at $190 per PCPartPicker. Granted, SuperBiiz is the low-priced merchant on both, but I've seen the 6400 at that price or a touch lower elsewhere--as low as $169 at Fry's with a promo code. Using those numbers and the maximum turbo frequency of each CPU (3.3GHz for the 6400 and 3.6GHz for the 6500), we get per-GHz prices of $52.72 for the 6400 and $52.78 for the 6500. The 6400 is now priced marginally better than the 6500.

 

Even using the more common price point of $180, we come up with $54.54 per GHz. Higher than the 6500, yes, but not painfully so. The 6500 is still a better CPU long-term, and would still be my preference in a gaming rig, but the value of the 6400 has come way up from where it was. It still kicks the 6100's ass in just about every way.

 

Of course, with the 6100 appearing in the wild as low as $90 (Fry's with promo code), that's an even more appealing buy for general purpose, HTPC and budget gaming rigs.

 

18 minutes ago, the MBK said:

Well, not for gaming.

Long term, you bet your ass the 6700 is a safer bet. We're rapidly approaching the point of AAA titles being interested in all the threads, and I suspect that day will be here long before the Skylake CPUs are obsolete. The i5 is a perfectly good gaming CPU today, and if you plan to build from scratch on Cannonlake, then an i5 is plenty. Beyond that, especially as the second generation of VR headsets start to appear and the games using them become more and more complex--remember, we're already capable of near-photorealistic graphics--eight threads will be a must for high-end gaming, not a nice-to-have.

Aerocool DS are the best fans you've never tried.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
3 minutes ago, aisle9 said:

Not exactly a true statement anymore. The 6400 is down to $174, and the 6500 is at $190 per PCPartPicker. Granted, SuperBiiz is the low-priced merchant on both, but I've seen the 6400 at that price or a touch lower elsewhere--as low as $169 at Fry's with a promo code. Using those numbers and the maximum turbo frequency of each CPU (3.3GHz for the 6400 and 3.6GHz for the 6500), we get per-GHz prices of $52.72 for the 6400 and $52.78 for the 6500. The 6400 is now priced marginally better than the 6500.

 

Even using the more common price point of $180, we come up with $54.54 per GHz. Higher than the 6500, yes, but not painfully so. The 6500 is still a better CPU long-term, and would still be my preference in a gaming rig, but the value of the 6400 has come way up from where it was. It still kicks the 6100's ass in just about every way.

 

Of course, with the 6100 appearing in the wild as low as $90 (Fry's with promo code), that's an even more appealing buy for general purpose, HTPC and budget gaming rigs.

Between all the i5 variations in this generation the others really aren't worth their salt... Kinda pointless buying a 6600k (I mean why pay  that extra for an unlocked multiplier when you could have just bought a 6700 for basically the same price.) And the 6400 to me is just slight better than the 6320 (I was hell bent on buying this if I couldn't get a 6500)

CPU: Intel i7 7700K | GPU: ROG Strix GTX 1080Ti | PSU: Seasonic X-1250 (faulty) | Memory: Corsair Vengeance RGB 3200Mhz 16GB | OS Drive: Western Digital Black NVMe 250GB | Game Drive(s): Samsung 970 Evo 500GB, Hitachi 7K3000 3TB 3.5" | Motherboard: Gigabyte Z270x Gaming 7 | Case: Fractal Design Define S (No Window and modded front Panel) | Monitor(s): Dell S2716DG G-Sync 144Hz, Acer R240HY 60Hz (Dead) | Keyboard: G.SKILL RIPJAWS KM780R MX | Mouse: Steelseries Sensei 310 (Striked out parts are sold or dead, awaiting zen2 parts)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
2 hours ago, the MBK said:

Well, not for gaming.

YES, got any proof 6600k is better performance?

So true it hurts

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

i5 lags in bf1. i3 will surely lag too

Need i7 for sweet gaming experience.

Source : my experience : had i5 4690k @ 4.6 ghz, was always at 100% usage and spike lags here and there

 

Now use i7 6700k : no lag at all, 0 spikes,
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
  • Author
3 hours ago, smokefest said:

i5 lags in bf1. i3 will surely lag too

Need i7 for sweet gaming experience.

Source : my experience : had i5 4690k @ 4.6 ghz, was always at 100% usage and spike lags here and there

 

Now use i7 6700k : no lag at all, 0 spikes,
 

Well, this extremely high amount of CPU usage was a bug, and it has been fixed, as far as I know.

 

4 hours ago, SirFlamenco said:

YES, got any proof 6600k is better performance?

Got any that it isn't. I couldn't find any benchmarks directly comparing a overclocked 6600k at about 4.5Ghz, which I would say is realistic, and a stock i7 6700 at 3.7Ghz.

What I said was just based on my experience with CPU utilisation in DX11 titles.

i5 6500 @3.2Ghz, Zotac GTX 1080 Ti Mini, 16GB DDR4 @2400Mhz, 240GB SSD, 1TB HDD, Corsair Vengance 650W, Asus Z170 Pro Gaming, Thermaltake Versa U21, Hyper 103

AOC Agon AG271UG 27" 4k G-Sync, G933, G502, G801

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

Who ever says a 6600k is better than a 6700k is in the wrong.. obviously....

 

1 minute ago, the MBK said:

Well, this amount of CPU usage was a bug, and it has been fixed, as far as I know.

 

Got any that it isn't. I couldn't find any benchmarks directly comparing a overclocked 6600k at about 4.5Ghz, which I would say is realistic, and a stock i7 6700 at 3.7Ghz.

What I said was just based on my experience with CPU utilisation in DX11 titles.

They didn't patch it. Nothing has been resolved. Same cpu usage as before. All my i5's friend are lagging here and there. Some maps are ok. Some are laggy as hell.

Its a new time : Time of the more than 4 core is used in games xD

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

I just picked up a 6500 for $165. You can also get a 6300 for absolutely a steal right now. 

 

I could never rock an i3. Just to give you perspective, my 8320 at 4.7 GHz is still slower than a 3.2 (with 3.6 Turbo) skylake chip. What! 

 

i3 hiccups on stuff. If you want smooth gameplay across multiple games and genres, you need a quadcore. 

 

I could justify the i7 at $100 more. I play old and free games mostly, so my criteria is different than most. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
18 hours ago, the MBK said:

Got any that it isn't. I couldn't find any benchmarks directly comparing a overclocked 6600k at about 4.5Ghz, which I would say is realistic, and a stock i7 6700 at 3.7Ghz.

What I said was just based on my experience with CPU utilisation in DX11 titles.

There ya go, hot and bakin for you

So true it hurts

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
On 11/28/2016 at 8:28 AM, the MBK said:

So I just ordered my new RX 480 and I thought a CPU upgrade would be a good thing.

I really don't have the money for a 6600k, so I thoght I might get the 6100 now and upgrade to the new Kaby Lake i7 later. But is the i3 good for good enough for not bottlenecking my RX 480 8GB, especially in the next 2 years.

The most CPU intensive games I play are Battlefield 1 and Witcher 3.

That's basically what I decided to do (built my i3 PC back in May).  My i3 6100 has been a good match with the 970 thus far, so your experience should be roughly the same with a 480.  As long as you know you'll be able to sell the i3 down the road (or use it in some way), I don't see a reason not to start off lower and work up.  Games are starting to take more advantage of 4+ core CPUs, but as long as you know you'll need to upgrade in 2 years to keep up, you should be fine.  

 

If you can manage the extra $50 though, then an i5 would likely serve you for a bit longer and better.

 

 

Sometimes I get builder's itch

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

If the FX-6300 can then sure the far superior i3-6100 will manage right? :D

Lake-V-X6-10600 (Gaming PC)

R23 score MC: 9190pts | R23 score SC: 1302pts

R20 score MC: 3529cb | R20 score SC: 506cb

Spoiler

Case: Cooler Master HAF XB Evo Black / Case Fan(s) Front: Noctua NF-A14 ULN 140mm Premium Fans / Case Fan(s) Rear: Corsair Air Series AF120 Quiet Edition (red) / Case Fan(s) Side: Noctua NF-A6x25 FLX 60mm Premium Fan / Controller: Sony Dualshock 4 Wireless (DS4Windows) / Cooler: Cooler Master Hyper 212 Evo / CPU: Intel Core i5-10600, 6-cores, 12-threads, 4.4/4.8GHz, 13,5MB cache (Intel 14nm++ FinFET) / Display: ASUS 24" LED VN247H (67Hz OC) 1920x1080p / GPU: Gigabyte Radeon RX Vega 56 Gaming OC @1501MHz (Samsung 14nm FinFET) / Keyboard: Logitech Desktop K120 (Nordic) / Motherboard: ASUS PRIME B460 PLUS, Socket-LGA1200 / Mouse: Razer Abyssus 2014 / PCI-E: ASRock USB 3.1/A+C (PCI Express x4) / PSU: EVGA SuperNOVA G2, 850W / RAM A1, A2, B1 & B2: DDR4-2666MHz CL13-15-15-15-35-1T "Samsung 8Gbit C-Die" (4x8GB) / Operating System: Windows 10 Home / Sound: Zombee Z300 / Storage 1 & 2: Samsung 850 EVO 500GB SSD / Storage 3: Seagate® Barracuda 2TB HDD / Storage 4: Seagate® Desktop 2TB SSHD / Storage 5: Crucial P1 1000GB M.2 SSD/ Storage 6: Western Digital WD7500BPKX 2.5" HDD / Wi-fi: TP-Link TL-WN851N 11n Wireless Adapter (Qualcomm Atheros)

Zen-II-X6-3600+ (Gaming PC)

R23 score MC: 9893pts | R23 score SC: 1248pts @4.2GHz

R23 score MC: 10151pts | R23 score SC: 1287pts @4.3GHz

R20 score MC: 3688cb | R20 score SC: 489cb

Spoiler

Case: Medion Micro-ATX Case / Case Fan Front: SUNON MagLev PF70251VX-Q000-S99 70mm / Case Fan Rear: Fanner Tech(Shen Zhen)Co.,LTD. 80mm (Purple) / Controller: Sony Dualshock 4 Wireless (DS4Windows) / Cooler: AMD Near-silent 125w Thermal Solution / CPU: AMD Ryzen 5 3600, 6-cores, 12-threads, 4.2/4.2GHz, 35MB cache (T.S.M.C. 7nm FinFET) / Display: HP 24" L2445w (64Hz OC) 1920x1200 / GPU: MSI GeForce GTX 970 4GD5 OC "Afterburner" @1450MHz (T.S.M.C. 28nm) / GPU: ASUS Radeon RX 6600 XT DUAL OC RDNA2 32CUs @2607MHz (T.S.M.C. 7nm FinFET) / Keyboard: HP KB-0316 PS/2 (Nordic) / Motherboard: ASRock B450M Pro4, Socket-AM4 / Mouse: Razer Abyssus 2014 / PCI-E: ASRock USB 3.1/A+C (PCI Express x4) / PSU: EVGA SuperNOVA G2, 550W / RAM A2 & B2: DDR4-3600MHz CL16-18-8-19-37-1T "SK Hynix 8Gbit CJR" (2x16GB) / Operating System: Windows 10 Home / Sound 1: Zombee Z500 / Sound 2: Logitech Stereo Speakers S-150 / Storage 1 & 2: Samsung 850 EVO 500GB SSD / Storage 3: Western Digital My Passport 2.5" 2TB HDD / Storage 4: Western Digital Elements Desktop 2TB HDD / Storage 5: Kingston A2000 1TB M.2 NVME SSD / Wi-fi & Bluetooth: ASUS PCE-AC55BT Wireless Adapter (Intel)

Vishera-X8-9370 | R20 score MC: 1476cb

Spoiler

Case: Cooler Master HAF XB Evo Black / Case Fan(s) Front: Noctua NF-A14 ULN 140mm Premium Fans / Case Fan(s) Rear: Corsair Air Series AF120 Quiet Edition (red) / Case Fan(s) Side: Noctua NF-A6x25 FLX 60mm Premium Fan / Case Fan VRM: SUNON MagLev KDE1209PTV3 92mm / Controller: Sony Dualshock 4 Wireless (DS4Windows) / Cooler: Cooler Master Hyper 212 Evo / CPU: AMD FX-8370 (Base: @4.4GHz | Turbo: @4.7GHz) Black Edition Eight-Core (Global Foundries 32nm) / Display: ASUS 24" LED VN247H (67Hz OC) 1920x1080p / GPU: MSI GeForce GTX 970 4GD5 OC "Afterburner" @1450MHz (T.S.M.C. 28nm) / GPU: Gigabyte Radeon RX Vega 56 Gaming OC @1501MHz (Samsung 14nm FinFET) / Keyboard: Logitech Desktop K120 (Nordic) / Motherboard: MSI 970 GAMING, Socket-AM3+ / Mouse: Razer Abyssus 2014 / PCI-E: ASRock USB 3.1/A+C (PCI Express x4) / PSU: EVGA SuperNOVA G2, 850W PSU / RAM 1, 2, 3 & 4: Corsair Vengeance DDR3-1866MHz CL8-10-10-28-37-2T (4x4GB) 16.38GB / Operating System 1: Windows 10 Home / Sound: Zombee Z300 / Storage 1: Samsung 850 EVO 500GB SSD (x2) / Storage 2: Seagate® Barracuda 2TB HDD / Storage 3: Seagate® Desktop 2TB SSHD / Wi-fi: TP-Link TL-WN951N 11n Wireless Adapter

Godavari-X4-880K | R20 score MC: 810cb

Spoiler

Case: Medion Micro-ATX Case / Case Fan Front: SUNON MagLev PF70251VX-Q000-S99 70mm / Case Fan Rear: Fanner Tech(Shen Zhen)Co.,LTD. 80mm (Purple) / Controller: Sony Dualshock 4 Wireless (DS4Windows) / Cooler: AMD Near-silent 95w Thermal Solution / Cooler: AMD Near-silent 125w Thermal Solution / CPU: AMD Athlon X4 860K Black Edition Elite Quad-Core (T.S.M.C. 28nm) / CPU: AMD Athlon X4 880K Black Edition Elite Quad-Core (T.S.M.C. 28nm) / Display: HP 19" Flat Panel L1940 (75Hz) 1280x1024 / GPU: EVGA GeForce GTX 960 SuperSC 2GB (T.S.M.C. 28nm) / GPU: MSI GeForce GTX 970 4GD5 OC "Afterburner" @1450MHz (T.S.M.C. 28nm) / Keyboard: HP KB-0316 PS/2 (Nordic) / Motherboard: MSI A78M-E45 V2, Socket-FM2+ / Mouse: Razer Abyssus 2014 / PCI-E: ASRock USB 3.1/A+C (PCI Express x4) / PSU: EVGA SuperNOVA G2, 550W PSU / RAM 1, 2, 3 & 4: SK hynix DDR3-1866MHz CL9-10-11-27-40 (4x4GB) 16.38GB / Operating System 1: Ubuntu Gnome 16.04 LTS (Xenial Xerus) / Operating System 2: Windows 10 Home / Sound 1: Zombee Z500 / Sound 2: Logitech Stereo Speakers S-150 / Storage 1: Samsung 850 EVO 500GB SSD (x2) / Storage 2: Western Digital My Passport 2.5" 2TB HDD / Storage 3: Western Digital Elements Desktop 2TB HDD / Wi-fi: TP-Link TL-WN851N 11n Wireless Adapter

Acer Aspire 7738G custom (changed CPU, GPU & Storage)
Spoiler

CPU: Intel Core 2 Duo P8600, 2-cores, 2-threads, 2.4GHz, 3MB cache (Intel 45nm) / GPU: ATi Radeon HD 4570 515MB DDR2 (T.S.M.C. 55nm) / RAM: DDR2-1066MHz CL7-7-7-20-1T (2x2GB) / Operating System: Windows 10 Home / Storage: Crucial BX500 480GB 3D NAND SATA 2.5" SSD

Complete portable device SoC history:

Spoiler
Apple A4 - Apple iPod touch (4th generation)
Apple A5 - Apple iPod touch (5th generation)
Apple A9 - Apple iPhone 6s Plus
HiSilicon Kirin 810 (T.S.M.C. 7nm) - Huawei P40 Lite / Huawei nova 7i
Mediatek MT2601 (T.S.M.C 28nm) - TicWatch E
Mediatek MT6580 (T.S.M.C 28nm) - TECNO Spark 2 (1GB RAM)
Mediatek MT6592M (T.S.M.C 28nm) - my|phone my32 (orange)
Mediatek MT6592M (T.S.M.C 28nm) - my|phone my32 (yellow)
Mediatek MT6735 (T.S.M.C 28nm) - HMD Nokia 3 Dual SIM
Mediatek MT6737 (T.S.M.C 28nm) - Cherry Mobile Flare S6
Mediatek MT6739 (T.S.M.C 28nm) - my|phone myX8 (blue)
Mediatek MT6739 (T.S.M.C 28nm) - my|phone myX8 (gold)
Mediatek MT6750 (T.S.M.C 28nm) - honor 6C Pro / honor V9 Play
Mediatek MT6765 (T.S.M.C 12nm) - TECNO Pouvoir 3 Plus
Mediatek MT6797D (T.S.M.C 20nm) - my|phone Brown Tab 1
Qualcomm MSM8926 (T.S.M.C. 28nm) - Microsoft Lumia 640 LTE
Qualcomm MSM8974AA (T.S.M.C. 28nm) - Blackberry Passport
Qualcomm SDM710 (Samsung 10nm) - Oppo Realme 3 Pro

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
23 hours ago, smokefest said:

i5 lags in bf1. i3 will surely lag too

Need i7 for sweet gaming experience.

Source : my experience : had i5 4690k @ 4.6 ghz, was always at 100% usage and spike lags here and there

 

Now use i7 6700k : no lag at all, 0 spikes,
 

my i5 isn't lagging in bf1

CPU: Intel i7 7700K | GPU: ROG Strix GTX 1080Ti | PSU: Seasonic X-1250 (faulty) | Memory: Corsair Vengeance RGB 3200Mhz 16GB | OS Drive: Western Digital Black NVMe 250GB | Game Drive(s): Samsung 970 Evo 500GB, Hitachi 7K3000 3TB 3.5" | Motherboard: Gigabyte Z270x Gaming 7 | Case: Fractal Design Define S (No Window and modded front Panel) | Monitor(s): Dell S2716DG G-Sync 144Hz, Acer R240HY 60Hz (Dead) | Keyboard: G.SKILL RIPJAWS KM780R MX | Mouse: Steelseries Sensei 310 (Striked out parts are sold or dead, awaiting zen2 parts)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
2 minutes ago, XenosTech said:

my i5 isn't lagging in bf1

they all say that until im in front of the computer and show them the lag xD

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
3 minutes ago, XenosTech said:

my i5 isn't lagging in bf1

All i5's r struggeling in like 4 maps. other maps are ok

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing CPUs, Motherboards, and Memory

×