Jump to content
3 minutes ago, Bondy3 said:

just curious,  as ECC only effects performance by 5%, I would think that everyone would want to use it,  but it isn't supported on a lot of CPUs,  just wondering why

Short answer. It cost more to produce and to make hardware that can run it.

I am a paid professional, but only when I am at work...and getting paid.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Artificial limitation, to differentiate server processors from desktop processors and push users to buy more expensive motherboards (for example workstation motherboards with ECC and 10gbps network cards, or boards with more expensive chipsets) if they want to have ECC enabled.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It does cost more to make, although how much more is arguable. In the CPU the difference is probably insignificant, but the ram modules would need a bit extra capacity in order to store the extra info to allow errors to be both detected and corrected. I'm not familiar with the internal structure to say how this might be organised and thus how much extra storage would be required.

Gaming system: R7 7800X3D, Asus ROG Strix B650E-F Gaming Wifi, Thermalright Phantom Spirit 120 SE ARGB, Corsair Vengeance 2x 32GB 6000C30, MSI Ventus 3x OC RTX 5070 Ti, MSI MPG A850G, Fractal Design North, Samsung 990 Pro 2TB, Alienware AW3225QF (32" 240 Hz OLED)
Productivity system: i9-7980XE, Asus X299 TUF mark 2, Noctua D15, 64GB ram (mixed), RTX 4070 FE, NZXT E850, GameMax Abyss, Samsung 980 Pro 2TB, iiyama ProLite XU2793QSU-B6 (27" 1440p 100 Hz)
Gaming laptop: Lenovo Legion 5, 5800H, RTX 3070, Kingston DDR4 3200C22 2x16GB 2Rx8, Kingston Fury Renegade 1TB + Crucial P1 1TB SSD, 165 Hz IPS 1080p G-Sync Compatible

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×