Only reason to buy AMD FX.

[Recon-UK]

Consoles use 8 module 1.6ghz cpu's.

Crysis 3 shows 2 fps better than 3570 with a 6300, and 2 fps better than 3770k with the 8350.

 

 

So, people who buy these only play Crysis, and rely on console companies hardware choices.

 

 

 

 

 

It seems the loyalists cannot even help themselves.

 

http://linustechtips.com/main/topic/51744-i5-2310-bottleneck-a-gtx-770/

[defunkt]

This is not the only reason. Stop fanboying.

[Frix]

Never played Crysis in my life. Learn your shit.

[Recon-UK]

I am now a fanboy for posting what AMD loyalists post o.0

[JujuShinobi]

What is this thread supposed to prove?

Can we PLEASE stop with the controversial AMD vs Intel threads? This is getting to the point where it's way more annoying that is it funny. The answer is "Whatever is better for your needs for the cost"

 

Hence, everyone can stop fanboying =/

[Recon-UK]

What is this thread supposed to prove?

Even in a topic that has nothing to do with AMD, it get's brought into discussion, and 2FPS is now a bottleneck! remember that!

[Frix]

I am now a fanboy for posting what AMD loyalists post o.0

You think AMD Loyalists post about getting 2fps more than Intel in Crysis

[JujuShinobi]

You think AMD Loyalists post about getting 2fps more than Intel in Crysis

2 fps, as Linus would say, is 'within the margin of error'.

So yes, posting about a 2 fps difference is kind of pointless

[Recon-UK]

You think AMD Loyalists post about getting 2fps more than Intel in Crysis

Yup, pretty much every thread in fact.

[Anubikai]

not evryone in the world need beastly single threaded performance you know. The fx range is more than enough for the majority of user out there. The usual choice for enthusiasts is intel but that doesnt mean amd is any worse. 2 fps is not the only reason to buy fx cpus and if it was then its a stupid reason...no one will care for an extra 2 fps unless they are benchmark whores.......if they had lets say an extra 15fps then it would be more acceptable, but they dont.....this thread should be closed. It has no purpose whatsoever....

 

-Anubikai

[Frix]

Yup, pretty much every thread in fact.

Doubt it.

[Frix]

Even in a topic that has nothing to do with AMD, it get's brought into discussion, and 2FPS is now a bottleneck! remember that!

Every computer has a bottleneck somewhere.

[Guest GRRigger]

Recon-UK did you create this post to spread untrue claims, or to start flame war? We`ve been through this many times, its getting old now and this post have no point at all. 

[Recon-UK]

not evryone in the world need beastly single threaded performance you know. The fx range is more than enough for the majority of user out there. The usual choice for enthusiasts is intel but that doesnt mean amd is any worse. 2 fps is not the only reason to buy fx cpus and if it was then its a stupid reason...no one will care for an extra 2 fps unless they are benchmark whores.......if they had lets say an extra 15fps then it would be more acceptable, but they dont.....this thread should be closed. It has no purpose whatsoever....

 

-Anubikai

You are biting the wrong end of the stick, i understand the logical reasoning behind buying whatever CPU someone chooses, i am using the intelligence shown by certain loyalists.

[JujuShinobi]

not evryone in the world need beastly single threaded performance you know. The fx range is more than enough for the majority of user out there. The usual choice for enthusiasts is intel but that doesnt mean amd is any worse. 2 fps is not the only reason to buy fx cpus and if it was then its a stupid reason...no one will care for an extra 2 fps unless they are benchmark whores.......if they had lets say an extra 15fps then it would be more acceptable, but they dont.....this thread should be closed. It has no purpose whatsoever....

 

-Anubikai

As in my thread previously which was more or less decimated by AMD fanboys, Intel is better yes if you have the money for it. If you don't, stick with AMD as they have great bang for buck CPUs. I have not seen a lot of people who are extremely dissatisfied with AMD FX Piledriver CPUs. And with more programs being more multithreaded optimized, I don't see the reason as to not go AMD at all.

[NinjaStyle013]

- Price/Performance

 

- Multi core performance

 

- OC abilities

 

- Getting a performance boost when titles begin to update to support next gen consoles

[JujuShinobi]

Can we just come to conclusion that this thread is pointless and needs to be taken down or all hell will break loose? 

[Scia]

Consoles use 8 module 1.6ghz cpu's.

Crysis 3 shows 2 fps better than 3570 with a 6300, and 2 fps better than 3770k with the 8350.

 

 

So, people who buy these only play Crysis, and rely on console companies hardware choices.

 

 

 

 

 

It seems the loyalists cannot even help themselves.

 

http://linustechtips.com/main/topic/51744-i5-2310-bottleneck-a-gtx-770/

 

Rofl, someone is being really butthurt that not everyone agrees with his choice of components.

This thread is really sad.

[Recon-UK]

Rofl, someone is being really butthurt that not everyone agrees with his choice of components.

This thread is really sad.

http://linustechtips.com/main/topic/51744-i5-2310-bottleneck-a-gtx-770/

 

Of course..

[M-ursu]

Never played Crysis in my life. Learn your shit.

[M-ursu]

 2 fps better than 3770k with the 8350

This thing F**ing  annoyes me!

3770k costs over 100€ more!

[Scia]

http://linustechtips.com/main/topic/51744-i5-2310-bottleneck-a-gtx-770/

 

Of course..

 

The only reason these fanboying threads exist is the people's need of acceptance of their choices and the knowledge, or let's call it peace of mind, that they have made the "right" choice by going with what seems to be most accepted within their respective community.

 

Ever since Logan's video these discussions have gone out of control, and honestly, it's quite pathetic to have these discussions here over and over and over and over again.

 

If you don't have the self-confidence to make the choice of components that's right for you, then I feel sorry for you.

 

And this rant about not everyone sharing you oppinion is even more sad. Like sad sad. Srsly dude, grow a pair.

[Recon-UK]

This thing F**ing  annoyes me!

3770k costs over 100€ more!

O.0

 

So.... what    ?

 

This is not a debate thread, just a mirror image of idiocy shown in a different thread, and other threads.

[Recon-UK]

The only reason these fanboying threads exist is the people's need of acceptance of their choices and the knowledge, or let's call it peace of mind, that they have made the "right" choice by going with what seems to be most accepted within their respective community.

 

Ever since Logan's video these discussions have gone out of control, and honestly, it's quite pathetic to have these discussions here over and over and over and over again.

 

If you don't have the self-confidence to make the choice of components that's right for you, then I feel sorry for you.

 

And this rant about not everyone sharing you oppinion is even more sad. Like sad sad. Srsly dude, grow a pair.

What has this got to do with my decision?

 

The linked thread is asking if a certain CPU will bottleneck a GTX 770, some plonker with no sense brings in the Crysis 3 bench and goes on to say that the certain CPU in question is a bottleneck, and all future games will run like shit on them o.0

[M-ursu]

O.0

 

So.... what    ?

 

This is not a debate thread, just a mirror image of idiocy shown in a different thread, and other threads.

i do not want to say what i want to say so i wont get banned...