Jump to content

EVGA 960 vs AMD 380

15Evan15

i think i am going to get the 960 because power is a lot less, and has WAY better reviews. but it is 4 fps less about. is tthat a big difference?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

i think i am going to get the 960 because power is a lot less, and has WAY better reviews. but it is 4 fps less about. is tthat a big difference?

Better reviews how?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

you must only be looking asus version of the 380 if the 960 is getting MUCH better reviews because the 380 its better hands down

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

quick differences:

- priced similarly (prices may differ between areas, keep that in mind)

- 380 performs better

- 960 is more energy efficient (matters for some people, not everyone has cheap power)

- 960 belches out less heat (once again, matters some people, others perform their pc to heat up their room. both sides of the argument are valid here)

- 380 comes with amd drivers if you're into that, 960 comes with nvidia drivers, if you're into that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

you must only be looking asus version of the 380 if the 960 is getting MUCH better reviews because the 380 its better hands down

the 960 has 5 star based on about 180 reviews. which 380 has more?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

The R9 280 is on par with the GTX 960 performance wise.

The R9 285 or R9 380 are a better choice compared against the GTX 960 IMO since they preform 10-15% better (5-9 frames if the R9 380 is outputting 60FPS)

 

The question you need to ask yourself is a card that uses about 1.25 more power but preforms 10-15% better at the same cost. Is it worth the extra power used? I'd say yes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

The R9 280 is on par with the GTX 960 performance wise.

The R9 285 or R9 380 are a better choice compared against the GTX 960 IMO since they preform 10-15% better (5-9 frames if the R9 380 is outputting 60FPS)

 

The question you need to ask yourself is a card that uses about 1.25 more power but preforms 10-15% better at the same cost. Is it worth the extra power used? I'd say yes.

where do oyu get that it performs better? on a reliable site

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you want to get more performance from your $$ get 380.

If you want to stick with a brand and really like Nvidia w/ its low power usage, go for it.

 

It all comes down to whatever makes you happy.

CPU: Ryzen 7 5800X | MOBO: Gigabyte B550 Vision D | RAM: Crucial Ballistix RGB 32GB 3600MHz | GPU: Gigabyte RTX 3070 Vision D | PSU: Seasonic Focus+ Gold 750W

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

where do oyu get that it performs better? on a reliable site

It's practically common knowledge now. A majority of benchmarks say the same thing. (I say majority because I haven't seen one that says otherwise but it might exist)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

where do oyu get that it performs better? on a reliable site

Most benchmarks will show the R9 380/R9 285 preforming better than the 960 by about 10-15%

ASUS-Radeon-R9-380-STRIX-Gaming-2-GB_Wat

R9-380-vs-gtx960.jpg

Power_02.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you want to get more performance from your $$ get 380.

If you want to stick with a brand and really like Nvidia w/ its low power usage, go for it.

 

It all comes down to whatever makes you happy.

is 5 fps a big diff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ill say, save up until you can afford a GTX 970

Intel Core i5 - 6400 <> Msi B150A Gaming Pro <> Msi Gtx 970 Gaming <> G.Skill Ripjaw 4 16Gb DDR4 2400mhz

<> Corsair CX500M <> 160 & 250 Seagate HDD <> Aerocool Strike X (Casing) <>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Most benchmarks will show the R9 380/R9 285 preforming better than the 960 by about 10-15%

[spoiler spoiler=Performance benchmarks]

ASUS-Radeon-R9-380-STRIX-Gaming-2-GB_Wat

R9-380-vs-gtx960.jpg

Power_02.png

thats not the SSC version.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

thats not the SSC version.

Coolers don't effect performance except if the card is thermal throttling, but any cooler should keep it bellow that temperature, if it doesn't RMA it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Generally, I'd recommend the 380 over the 960, better performance for very similar cost. 

 

That said, I honestly reckon you should look towards the used market, plenty of people shipping off their 280X's and upgrading to the latest generation. You can find stellar bargains on that card. I'm in Australia where the dollar is doing quite poorly and I can see plenty of 280X's on Gumtree (our equivalent of Craigslist) for around $200 or a little more (bargain down to $200 easily). 

 

That's much less than a 380 and you're getting better performance. 

 

If you have a specific budget you want to spend, have a look at a 2nd hand R9 290. Plenty of them going used too, around the same price as a 380 (or maybe a smidge more). If you're buying cards down one or two notches from the top, I always recommend going for the best from previous generations 2nd hand as people who like to stay on top of things sell them off to upgrade. 

 

I find that used 290X's tend to be stellar deals, as are used GTX 680's, which can be had for around $200 or so and it performs better than a 960. 

My Personal Rig - AMD 3970X | ASUS sTRX4-Pro | RTX 2080 Super | 64GB Corsair Vengeance Pro RGB DDR4 | CoolerMaster H500P Mesh

My Wife's Rig - AMD 3900X | MSI B450I Gaming | 5500 XT 4GB | 32GB Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4-3200 | Silverstone SG13 White

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

How surprising, a higher performing card using more power. Sorry but the over used 'AMD uses more power' argument is misused and misinterpreted. Taking in to account the small performance advantage, completely different GPU core architecture and fabrication the slightly worse power efficiency is within reason. You will save more power using LED lights in your house or turning lights off when not used than 8 hours gaming EVERY day at that power difference. That's only one power saving piece of advise too.

 

There is much more variation in the car industry for fuel usage but that doesn't stop anyone going for the less efficient car that they personally prefer, what ever their reason. If it was truly a valid reason not to use the 380 over the 960 you could apply that to any other comparison within just the Nvidia lineup.

 

Power efficiency is something that AMD should improve on but the difference is not enough to artificially heat your room etc compared to the equivalent performing Nvidia card.

 

My advice would be to buy which ever card you prefer, neither choice is more right or wrong than the other.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×