Jump to content

I am going to play games such as Dota 2, Minecraft, Project cars, Battlefield hardline, Star wars battlefront and Dying light at ultra 60fps 1080p. Don't know what to explain here. Which gpu should I take?

P.S. ONLY NVIDIA!

Buying gaming pc on janurary 2017!

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/476451-which-gpu-should-i-getonly-nvidia/
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am going to play games such as Dota 2, Minecraft, Project cars, Battlefield hardline, Star wars battlefront and Dying light at ultra 60fps 1080p. Don't know what to explain here. Which gpu should I take?

P.S. ONLY NVIDIA!

whats your buget

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm curious why nvidia only?

Want a good game to play?  Check out Shadowrun: http://store.steampowered.com/app/300550/ (runs on literally any hardware)

 

another 12 core / 24 thread senpai...     (/. _ .)/     \(. _ .\)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm going out on a whim and I'm going to assume that it's  because they want ShadowPlay or GameStream.

or just being a fanboi

"Never quote yourself"

        -I need a better name

Link to post
Share on other sites

Radeon: power consumption, low oc headroom(I get $200 on power bills and radeon would add my bills, ugh)

by like a $1 month?

power-load.gif

Thats that. If you need to get in touch chances are you can find someone that knows me that can get in touch.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Radeon: power consumption, low oc headroom(I get $200 on power bills and radeon would add my bills, ugh)

Oh no! $3 more! Low OC headroom because Nvidia cut so much stuff of Maxwell to make lower power consumption and heat therefore ridiculous clocks.

USEFUL LINKS:

PSU Tier List F@H stats

Link to post
Share on other sites

or he doesn't know much and believes that NVIDIA is the best? Fanboying? (Although they are great)

I would have to extend my budget if I get radeon. An 600w is out of my budget.

P.S. My budget for my pc build is $1035, and I don't wanna sacrifice skylake just for a radeon.

Buying gaming pc on janurary 2017!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would have to extend my budget if I get radeon. An 600w is out of my budget.

P.S. My budget for my pc build is $1035, and I don't wanna sacrifice skylake just for a radeon.

I'm not sure that Skylake will benefit you in any meaningful way. If you want to go with it though I guess I can't stop you.

Sig under construction.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Radeon: power consumption, low oc headroom(I get $200 on power bills and radeon would add my bills, ugh)

 

It's not going to freaking drain your local power plant. I would understand this if you were to be upgrading and don't have the budget to buy a higher wattage PSU.

Rule of thumb: get the best bang of the buck for your price range, don't say "x team is better than y team", since it's usually false (GPU/CPU wise).

Link to post
Share on other sites

To be honest i would go for a 4790k and a r9 390 if that suits your budget maybe even a fury IF it would fit but skylake is in my mind just not worth it for the price.

 

On 11/19/2014 at 2:14 PM, Syntaxvgm said:
You would think Ubisoft would support the Bulldozer based architectures more given their digging themed names like bulldozer, Piledriver, Steamroller and Excavator.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Radeon: power consumption, low oc headroom(I get $200 on power bills and radeon would add my bills, ugh)

I doubt 60W is gonna do much to a power bill, and every mhz does more with Radeon

But 980 would be the best option although 390X has a clear advantage in a game like Battlefront if that matters

                                                                                                                 Setup

CPU: i3 4160|Motherboard: MSI Z97 PC MATE|RAM: Kingston HyperX Blue 8GB(2x4GB)|GPU: Sapphire Nitro R9 380 4GB|PSU: Seasonic M12II EVO 620W Modular|Storage: 1TB WD Blue|Case: NZXT S340 Black|PCIe devices: TP-Link WDN4800| Montior: ASUS VE247H| Others: PS3/PS4

Link to post
Share on other sites

Low oc headroom doesn't mean less performance a overclocked 390 is still just as good/better as a 970 with a retardedly high oc due to its better performance per clock and as others have said it's only $1 a month. Don't trust the other bs too like "shitty drivers" or "catches fire and burned my house down"

Link to post
Share on other sites

by like a $1 month?

power-load.gif

Not sure how they got that reading but it's BS. If a 290 pulled 400w then I wouldn't be able to crossfire with a 750w PSU.

On topic, the answer is the same no matter the brand, the best you can afford.

If anyone asks you never saw me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure how they got that reading but it's BS. If a 290 pulled 400w then I wouldn't be able to crossfire with a 750w PSU.

On topic, the answer is the same no matter the brand, the best you can afford.

Its total system so subtract ~150-200w for the CPU, ram etc

Thats that. If you need to get in touch chances are you can find someone that knows me that can get in touch.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its total system so subtract ~150-200w for the CPU, ram etc

Ah, still high but makes more sense. Using an inline meter you usually see something in the high 200s to low 300s with a 290. Maybe that's a reference? I can confirm that the 390 pulls much less wattage, and runs much cooler than the 290 fitted with the best cooler even.

If anyone asks you never saw me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×