Jump to content

More cores or less?

Go to solution Solved by SteveGrabowski,

For editing, the CPUs from best to worst are probably

 

1. Xeon E7, Xeon E5 series (6 to 15 cores plus HT)

2. Enthusiast i7 series (6 to 8 cores plus HT)

3. Mainstream i7 and Xeon E3 series (quacores plus HT)

4. FX-8 series (octacores)

5. i5 series (quadcores w/o hypertheading)

 

Basically, moar corez all the way except for mainstream i7/XeonE3 over FX-8. Seems like it's hard to beat the incredible value an FX-8350 offers this use case scenario where you're editing video and images, unless you can afford enthusiast i7s or Xeon E5 or better.

What's better for editing. Using Sony Vegas Pro 13 and Photoshop cs6.

The Brokish Boy v1: CPU: i7-8700k GPU: MSI Gaming X GTX ti MOBO: Asus ROG Maximus X Code Ram: G.Skill Trident Z 4x8gb 3200mhz DRIVES: 2x3TB WD Black , 500gb Samsung 850 EVO SSD, 500gb 970 EVO SSD Case: be quiet! Dark Base Pro 900 Black Headphone: ATH-MSR7 Mic: Blue Yeti Monitors: 27" BenQ GW2765 1440p; IPS, 27" Acer Predator XB271HU 1440p; VA

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/342671-more-cores-or-less/
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

more

i5-4690k @ 4.2GHz | Asus Radeon R9 290 DirectCU II | Hyper 212 EVO | ASRock Z97 Extreme3 | Corsair Vengeance 8GB 1866MHz, Corsair XMS 4GB | 850 EVO 250GB, random 1TB drive | Corsair 200R | EVGA SuperNOVA 750W | Rosewill RK-9000BR | Logitech G700s | Logitech G930 | ViewSonic VG2427wm, Dell S2209W, Dell S2009W

Dell Inspiron 3147

Latitude E5420, Samsung 840 EVO 250gb, 12gb RAM, 1600x900 display

Pentium G3258 @ 3.2GHz | WD Red 2TB x3 in RAID-Z, Crucial MX100 128GB(cache drive) | Fractal Design Node 304 | Gigabyte GA-H97N-WIFI | Crucial Ballistix Sport 8GB | EVGA 500B

HTC One M8 64GB, Droid Razr M

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/342671-more-cores-or-less/#findComment-4668254
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not gaming eh? Then throw everything you've heard out of the window. 

 

More cores = better

better = faster render times

faster render times = more time for gaming

gaming = less cores

less cores = more cash?

more cash = more ways to spend that cash

more ways to spend that cash = buying a new game... Hmmm

new game = half life three!    Half life three confirmed!

Updated 2021 Desktop || 3700x || Asus x570 Tuf Gaming || 32gb Predator 3200mhz || 2080s XC Ultra || MSI 1440p144hz || DT990 + HD660 || GoXLR + ifi Zen Can || Avermedia Livestreamer 513 ||

New Home Dedicated Game Server || Xeon E5 2630Lv3 || 16gb 2333mhz ddr4 ECC || 2tb Sata SSD || 8tb Nas HDD || Radeon 6450 1g display adapter ||

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/342671-more-cores-or-less/#findComment-4668264
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

For editing, the CPUs from best to worst are probably

 

1. Xeon E7, Xeon E5 series (6 to 15 cores plus HT)

2. Enthusiast i7 series (6 to 8 cores plus HT)

3. Mainstream i7 and Xeon E3 series (quacores plus HT)

4. FX-8 series (octacores)

5. i5 series (quadcores w/o hypertheading)

 

Basically, moar corez all the way except for mainstream i7/XeonE3 over FX-8. Seems like it's hard to beat the incredible value an FX-8350 offers this use case scenario where you're editing video and images, unless you can afford enthusiast i7s or Xeon E5 or better.

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/342671-more-cores-or-less/#findComment-4669237
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×