Jump to content

R9 290x Crossfire Review - performance, cooling, noise, energy [WIP]

Tacitus

Ok, great, I may consider doing it in a month or two. I hope you don't mind if I PM you to ask any questions down the line! :P

 

Not at all, happy to help!  Add me.

"I genuinely dislike the promulgation of false information, especially to people who are asking for help selecting new parts."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to hijack,,.,.Curious if you know quickly offhand if the Gigabyte 290X (triple fan) is compatible? - http://www.gigabyte.com.au/products/product-page.aspx?pid=4919#ov

/It's got 4 main screws on the back, with two smaller ones further down where the VRM's are.

I have a really hot core (after reseating/pasting) up to 87*c and vrm @ 104*c and I want it lowered...

Msg me if possible to keep this thread clean if need be... Many thanks.

 

87c STOCK? Holy crap thats absolutely insane. I have my Tri-X overclocked to 1100/1500 and It almost never gets over 80c (haven't changed thermal paste), I know the Tri-X cooler is a bit better than the gigabyte but not by that much at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

87c STOCK? Holy crap thats absolutely insane. I have my Tri-X overclocked to 1100/1500 and It almost never gets over 80c (haven't changed thermal paste), I know the Tri-X cooler is a bit better than the gigabyte but not by that much at all.

Tell me about it!

RMA'd my 72*c MAX R9-290 OC, got back a 290X, but man... o man... it's hot as hell.

Finding out tonight if its a reference pcb when I get home,.. to find out if I can easily watercool it.

/Edit: I have REF!@!!!!! - Watercooling is a GOGO!!

Maximums - Asus Z97-K /w i5 4690 Bclk @106.9Mhz * x39 = 4.17Ghz, 8GB of 2600Mhz DDR3,.. Gigabyte GTX970 G1-Gaming @ 1550Mhz

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

i didn't know the pcs 290 looked so good. great review i look forward to seeing the rest. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

My uncle recently upgraded from a single r9 290 to 2 r9 290x's. He got them for ana amzing price too. 2 r9 290x's with the waterblocks pre-installed for 540$, you cam't go wrong with that! Plus the cards do run really well.

My Main PC:

CPUi5 3570k CPU Cooler: Cooler Master Hyper T4 Motherboard: Asus p8z77-v pro  RAM: Crucial Balistic 2x4gb  GPU: Two PNY GTX 680's in SLI Case: Some rando Antec one  PSU: Thermaltake 1000w  Display: HP Elite Display 321i 23''  Storage: Samsung 840 Evo 128gb, Seagate Barracuda 1tb

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

i didn't know the pcs 290 looked so good. great review i look forward to seeing the rest. 

They are very nice looking indeed! Here's another shot:

 

post-68461-0-29753500-1425396204_thumb.j

 

My uncle recently upgraded from a single r9 290 to 2 r9 290x's. He got them for ana amzing price too. 2 r9 290x's with the waterblocks pre-installed for 540$, you cam't go wrong with that! Plus the cards do run really well.

 

Great value. I'm considering doing the Kraken G10 mod to my top card. If and when I do I'll report back :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

since you're at it, you could confirm this

 

37_02_sapphire_radeon_r9_290x_tri_x_over

 

Seems like downsampling on battlefield 4 shows the true power consumption of the card:

 

" We went from 860W on our overclocked Tri-X GPUs to a massive, unexpected 1050W. I couldn't believe my eyes when I saw the power meter ticking at 1050W, as this is something I would've expected from a 3-way CrossFire setup. "

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

-snip-

 

I couldn't confirm power consumption in that precise game, as I do not have nor play BF4.

 

I can confirm power consumption rises with supersampling, but again, in my system with both cards at 100% usage in a gaming scenario I never saw above 700W from the wall.

 

I'll take a look at that review and see what I think because for some reason it does say in that chart "higher is better" which obviously is not the case.

 

EDIT: could you link me to that review actually?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I couldn't confirm power consumption in that precise game, as I do not have nor play BF4.

 

I can confirm power consumption rises with supersampling, but again, in my system with both cards at 100% usage in a gaming scenario I never saw above 700W from the wall.

 

I'll take a look at that review and see what I think because for some reason it does say in that chart "higher is better" which obviously is not the case.

 

EDIT: could you link me to that review actually?

 

http://www.tweaktown.com/tweakipedia/37/sapphire-radeon-r9-290x-tri-x-overclocked-power-consumption-numbers/index.html

 

There you go. Im not sure either of the results as they are not validate by any other hardware reviewer out there. But i havent seen anyone pushing the cards to the limit on a game like battlefield 4 multiplayer. Since the CPU is very stress on a 64 players map, and the gpus are also because of the supersampling, it doesnt sound like a impossible scenario

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.tweaktown.com/tweakipedia/37/sapphire-radeon-r9-290x-tri-x-overclocked-power-consumption-numbers/index.html

 

There you go. Im not sure either of the results as they are not validate by any other hardware reviewer out there. But i havent seen anyone pushing the cards to the limit on a game like battlefield 4 multiplayer. Since the CPU is very stress on a 64 players map, and the gpus are also because of the supersampling, it doesnt sound like a impossible scenario

 

A 450W EXTRA from just an overclock to me seems ridiculous. I am not convinced. With that said, they're putting an extra 200mv through the cards, whereas mine are at stock voltages.

 

It might well be, but I don't think many people who own the cards will be putting that much voltage through them. I certainly am not altering my voltages.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not bad. Glad you found out the power requirements. Hopefully more people will read this and FINALLY realise that hawaii reallyy does not draw anywhere NEAR as much power as people like to make out. The 780Ti usually drew like 10-20w less than the R9 290X, which no one seemed to care about, but 290/X? YOU NEED A NUCLEAR REACTOR. Silly fanboys, oh well, rant over.

Looks like you have had a good experience! AMD's multi monitor support is far better than nvidia's imo, you should upgrade this thread with those results when you can.

In terms of just 3 monitors they're about the same, but it's when you want more AMD is the way to go! Of course quadro cards can do more than 3, Nvidia really needs to bring that down to the consumer cards!

I love it when people say "you need a crazy psu" to power an AMD card, I just sit back and laugh! The 300 series looks promising, is it the messiah? Who knows, hopefully a 390x beats down a 980, as I have no problem going team red buuuut I also like my sheild..

I'm Batman!

Steam: Rukiri89 | uPlay: Rukiri89 | Origin: XxRukiriXx | Xbox LIVE: XxRUKIRIxX89 | PSN: Ericks1989 | Nintendo Network ID: Rukiri

Project Xenos: Motherboard: MSI Z170a M9 ACK | CPU: i7 6700k | Ram: G.Skil TridentZ 16GB 3000mhz | PSU: EVGA SuperNova 850w G2 | Case: Caselabs SMA8 | Cooling: Custom Loop | Still in progress 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I did find it funny when the 300w argument kept coming up.

 

I have that now on my voltage modded 290 overclock... so it's nothing new...or outrageous in any way...

 

Spikes past 300w are common enough when pushing them.

Maximums - Asus Z97-K /w i5 4690 Bclk @106.9Mhz * x39 = 4.17Ghz, 8GB of 2600Mhz DDR3,.. Gigabyte GTX970 G1-Gaming @ 1550Mhz

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Of course 3 overclocked gpu's are going to draw a shit ton of power, I don't know why people are suprised.

My Main PC:

CPUi5 3570k CPU Cooler: Cooler Master Hyper T4 Motherboard: Asus p8z77-v pro  RAM: Crucial Balistic 2x4gb  GPU: Two PNY GTX 680's in SLI Case: Some rando Antec one  PSU: Thermaltake 1000w  Display: HP Elite Display 321i 23''  Storage: Samsung 840 Evo 128gb, Seagate Barracuda 1tb

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have done the g10 kracken mod for 2 290x's in the air 540 if you have a giant air cooler like a d-15 or such it is a pain to fit all the tubing for the cards everywhere as the tubing must either be fairly long or there will be issues geting them all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have done the g10 kracken mod for 2 290x's in the air 540 if you have a giant air cooler like a d-15 or such it is a pain to fit all the tubing for the cards everywhere as the tubing must either be fairly long or there will be issues geting them all.

 

Thanks for informing me of this. I have the stock Intel CPU cooler! :P

 

How did the modding go? Smooth experience for you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for informing me of this. I have the stock Intel CPU cooler! :P

 

How did the modding go? Smooth experience for you?

yep, typing this from my tablet now, but it went pretty well, temps both below 65 c on all card parts when benchmarking and with one card it was about 52 c. definite noise improvement as it allows me to run all my fans more silently, the swoosh of the water cooler pump has a really nice ambient noise in my opinion too. The worst part is if you have a huge tower cooler, you are going to need to have long tubes as the lack of a bottom fan mount really hurts the 540 in my case, but the mod really helps because of the lack of the side or bottom fan and allows the gpus to dump their heat outside if they lack a blower. all in all it cost me about 120 usd to do the mod for my two cards and it was well worth it in my opinion due to the crossfire temps and noise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×