Jump to content

Linus is apparently having a comparison soon regarding this... what do you guys think of it?

 

IMO, what a pointless comparison. The AMD FX stock cooler is obviously going to be better at cooling then any Intel stock cooler thanks to it's much denser fin array and actual presence of heatpipes. Of course Intel has the fan advantage as their "standard thickness" 70mm fan moves more air for the noise level then AMD's slim 60mm.

 

i7_roundup-025.jpghqdefault.jpg

 

That being said, of course AMD FX chips put out more heat, so the difference pretty much gets cancelled out.....

 

Both AMD and Intel stock heatsink sizes vary, so obviously putting an i7 cooler on a Celeron will present better temps, and putting an FX 8350 cooler on an A4 will present better temps, but it's not like you can stick an FX cooler on an i5 for a good cheap low-profile cooler?

"Rawr XD"

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/318218-amd-vs-intel-stock-cooler/
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Came with my Phenom II X6 and friend's 8320...? I have two of them in the closet.

The ones with the FX 4300 are just aluminum blocks with fins in them.

 

I guess they use different ones or something...g

Link to post
Share on other sites

The ones with the FX 4300 are just aluminum blocks with fins in them.

 

I guess they use different ones or something...g

That explains it. 95W chips (FX4, some FX6, and FX8E) use the standard aluminum-only heatsinks while 125W chips get the beefy heatpiped one.

 

Honestly the aluminum-only heatsinks aren't enough to cool 95W chips, they're really only designed for 65W ones.... but the copper heatpiped ones are actually perfectly capable of cooling 125W chips, if only it weren't for the noise :P

"Rawr XD"

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's a 'neat' comparison....I guess, but the issue is just...why would this ever matter to anyone? 

PSU Tier List | CoC

Gaming Build | FreeNAS Server

Spoiler

i5-4690k || Seidon 240m || GTX780 ACX || MSI Z97s SLI Plus || 8GB 2400mhz || 250GB 840 Evo || 1TB WD Blue || H440 (Black/Blue) || Windows 10 Pro || Dell P2414H & BenQ XL2411Z || Ducky Shine Mini || Logitech G502 Proteus Core

Spoiler

FreeNAS 9.3 - Stable || Xeon E3 1230v2 || Supermicro X9SCM-F || 32GB Crucial ECC DDR3 || 3x4TB WD Red (JBOD) || SYBA SI-PEX40064 sata controller || Corsair CX500m || NZXT Source 210.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wish stock coolers started to use some pipes T~T I paid goddamn 100$ you give me a nice little stock heatsink goddammit

Cause no <$100 CPU needs it lol

 

Stock heatsinks were designed to be run with CPUs at stock speeds :P

"Rawr XD"

Link to post
Share on other sites

A lot of stock coolers are different with varying models on AMD so I'm not really sure.

CPU: i5-4690k GPU: 280x Toxic PSU: Coolermaster V750 Motherboard: Z97X-SOC RAM: Ripjaws 1x8 1600mhz Case: Corsair 750D HDD: WD Blue 1TB

How to Build A PC|Windows 10 Review Follow the CoC and don't be a scrub~soaringchicken

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder if it would be cheaper for Intel / AMD to strike a deal with CoolerMaster to produce some of their Hyper models for various chips? 

 

(Re-badge the heatsinks and give CoolerMaster a cut of every chip sold that's bundled with them.)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder if it would be cheaper for Intel / AMD to strike a deal with CoolerMaster to produce some of their Hyper models for various chips? 

 

(Re-badge the heatsinks and give CoolerMaster a cut of every chip sold that's bundled with them.)

If it was, they'd be doing that. 

 

Also, Intel/AMD do (more than likely) outsource the manufacturing of their heatsinks. 

PSU Tier List | CoC

Gaming Build | FreeNAS Server

Spoiler

i5-4690k || Seidon 240m || GTX780 ACX || MSI Z97s SLI Plus || 8GB 2400mhz || 250GB 840 Evo || 1TB WD Blue || H440 (Black/Blue) || Windows 10 Pro || Dell P2414H & BenQ XL2411Z || Ducky Shine Mini || Logitech G502 Proteus Core

Spoiler

FreeNAS 9.3 - Stable || Xeon E3 1230v2 || Supermicro X9SCM-F || 32GB Crucial ECC DDR3 || 3x4TB WD Red (JBOD) || SYBA SI-PEX40064 sata controller || Corsair CX500m || NZXT Source 210.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder if it would be cheaper for Intel / AMD to strike a deal with CoolerMaster to produce some of their Hyper models for various chips? 

 

(Re-badge the heatsinks and give CoolerMaster a cut of every chip sold that's bundled with them.)

Problem is, not all cases will fit tower heatsinks.

"Rawr XD"

Link to post
Share on other sites

AMD: The high end heatsinks are actually pretty good, just loud with hot CPU's. They make great "aftermarket" heatsinks for lower end chips. The lower end heatsinks ar pretty bad though, the base has an un even rough surface, and over all the cooling capacity is only "okay".

 

Intel: From low end to high end they are all pretty quiet, but they are maxed out on cooling capacity. The low end "aluminum only" heatsinks are pretty bad, but they get the job done. I'm personally not a fan of the plastic push clips on these heatsinks.

 

Also, Intel/AMD do (more than likely) outsource the manufacturing of their heatsinks. 

AVC and Foxconn make AMD's heatsinks. I'm not sure who makes Intels, but I'm sure its also Foxconn.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They're both shit and anyone who cares about their PC, even if running at stock will replace it with something better.

 

I recall when i put together a shitty rig for my old man to play Solitaire on years ago, with an Intel E6300 i got for free, and i replaced the stock cooler with an Arctic Freezer 7 Pro.

Shot through the heart and you're to blame, 30fps and i'll pirate your game - Bon Jovi

Take me down to the console city where the games are blurry and the frames are thirty - Guns N' Roses

Arguing with religious people is like explaining to your mother that online games can't be paused...

Link to post
Share on other sites

But people do run high-end chips in slim cases...

Then buy a heatrsink that fits. I'm just saying, I don't think people would want to run the heatsink that comes with the FX-6300, on an FX-9590. CoolerMaster could produce heatsinks for all of the chip lines that perform very well, instead of AMD offering poor heatsinks. Intel is a little different though, but my main perspective here was with AMD; I should have specified. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've said it before, and I'll say it again: the Stock Coolers on any product are designed to do the bare minimum in cooling said part at the cheapest price possible. THEYRE NOT DESIGNED  FOR PERFORMANCE. Don't expect any stock cooler to be quiet, cool, or quality. They will cool a chip acceptably at stock speeds. They arent supposed to be quiet, or really cool. If youre overclocking, get something better. If you care about silence, get something better. Everyone needs to stop complaining about stock coolers.

"We are not defined by the lives we are forced to live, but by the choices we are free to make"

Link to post
Share on other sites

I used both the heatpiped AMD heatsink and the Intel stock heatsink and I found them pretty comparable. The AMD one was able to keep my 8320 plenty cool and it was never loud, and I just recently had to switch to the stock heatsink on my G3258 because I broke a mount on my cooler master heatsink and I am actually pretty happy with it. CPU is at 4.4GHz @ 1.31v and it still doesn't get above mid 70's.

Desktop: i9 11900k, 32GB DDR4, 4060 Ti 8GB 🙂

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×