Jump to content

CPU Time spy score Ryzen 5 5600x. Is it low ? can i get it higher ?

Bootyman

Hey guys, 

so recently i got into Overclocking and wanted to improve my Time spy score (insert "Scarface-Push it to the limit" music) . First of all, here are my PC specs:

 

Motherboard: MSI X570 gaming edge wifi 
CPU: Ryzen 5 5600x 
GPU: RX 6900xt 

RAM: Crucial ballistix 3600mhz Cl16 

PSU: 850w 

Fully aircooled System (good airflow) 

 

This is my highscore in Timespy so far: http://www.3dmark.com/spy/26413685

 

I achieved this doing the following changes:

 

GPU

Increased Power limits using MorePowerTool 

-Power Limit in W GPU=340 
-TDC Limits in A GFX=370

Overclocked using radeon Software

-Vram to fast timing and max clock 

-Gpu tuning Min Freq.= 2400mhz  Max Freq.=2750 
-Voltage 100%

-Left Voltage Limit at 0% since i increased it in MPT 
-NIce Fan curve for cooling 

 

Ram 

-Voltage to 1.4v
-Clock speed to 3733
-FCLK To 1866

-New Timings CL15-trcdwr15-trdrd17-trp15-tras32

This Brought down the latency from 65ns to 58.8ns

 

CPU

Voltage to 1.35

All core oc 4750mhz 

 

Why didnt i use PBO ? 

I tried using PBO but it brought me the same performace increase as Auto OC in Ryzen Master. It just brought me 100 points less then just doing a manual all core OC. 

I first set the PBO limits to the default and tested step by step negative offsets in the curve optimizer, using Windows event viewer to determine what core crashed when i set an offset to high. 

After that i set the PBO Limits  PPT 200, TDC 100, EDC 150.
Last i set  the boost override to 200mhz.

 

 

To my questions 

 

I see many results with way over 9000 CPU points in Time spy, What can i do or try differently to get better results ? 

Should i set my RAM clocks back to 3600 so i can tighten my timings more ? 

Is it normal that my GPU does not want to clock over 2700 even without being Power or Thermal limited ? 

Did i do something wrong with my PBO settings ? If not is it normal that an all core OC just gives me better results ? 

 

 

Watercooling would get me better performance out of my AMD parts, i know, but i dont seem to hit thermal limits in any way so i feel like there is more to get out of it. 

 

Edit: 

I forgot to mention that I have SAM enabled. 


 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's not just PBO, but PBO combined with a per core undervolt using the curve optimizer where you'll get the most out of your chip. It's a decent all core OC you achieved, but you're hurting single core perf.

CPU: AMD Ryzen 9 5900X · Cooler: Artic Liquid Freezer II 280 · Motherboard: MSI MEG X570 Unify · RAM: G.skill Ripjaws V 2x16GB 3600MHz CL16 (2Rx8) · Graphics Card: ASUS GeForce RTX 3060 Ti TUF Gaming · Boot Drive: 500GB WD Black SN750 M.2 NVMe SSD · Game Drive: 2TB Crucial MX500 SATA SSD · PSU: Corsair White RM850x 850W 80+ Gold · Case: Corsair 4000D Airflow · Monitor: MSI Optix MAG342CQR 34” UWQHD 3440x1440 144Hz · Keyboard: Corsair K100 RGB Optical-Mechanical Gaming Keyboard (OPX Switch) · Mouse: Corsair Ironclaw RGB Wireless Gaming Mouse

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Chris Pratt said:

It's not just PBO, but PBO combined with a per core undervolt using the curve optimizer where you'll get the most out of your chip. It's a decent all core OC you achieved, but you're hurting single core perf.

I wont rum that all core oc every day, certainly not for gaming. Its just for the benchmark so im not worried about single core performance. I didnt use PBO because i was getting better results that way. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your score seems decent in my opinion. Guessing that your system isn't optimized solely for running benchmarks, 18310 pts isn't bad. But isn't a great score either. 

 

Work on higher Memory : Infinity Fabric speeds (1:1). Tight timings and latency won't matter a great deal with this particular benchmark, so loosen up and go for the bandwidth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Bootyman said:

I wont rum that all core oc every day, certainly not for gaming. Its just for the benchmark so im not worried about single core performance. I didnt use PBO because i was getting better results that way. 

Only because you weren't using PBO in combination with an undervolt. That was the point. Also, I pointed out single core performance because that's what matters most for gaming. I'm not certain how much it matters for 3DMark, but given it's primarily a benchmark for 3D graphic performance, it might be significant.

CPU: AMD Ryzen 9 5900X · Cooler: Artic Liquid Freezer II 280 · Motherboard: MSI MEG X570 Unify · RAM: G.skill Ripjaws V 2x16GB 3600MHz CL16 (2Rx8) · Graphics Card: ASUS GeForce RTX 3060 Ti TUF Gaming · Boot Drive: 500GB WD Black SN750 M.2 NVMe SSD · Game Drive: 2TB Crucial MX500 SATA SSD · PSU: Corsair White RM850x 850W 80+ Gold · Case: Corsair 4000D Airflow · Monitor: MSI Optix MAG342CQR 34” UWQHD 3440x1440 144Hz · Keyboard: Corsair K100 RGB Optical-Mechanical Gaming Keyboard (OPX Switch) · Mouse: Corsair Ironclaw RGB Wireless Gaming Mouse

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Chris Pratt said:

Only because you weren't using PBO in combination with an undervolt. That was the point. Also, I pointed out single core performance because that's what matters most for gaming. I'm not certain how much it matters for 3DMark, but given it's primarily a benchmark for 3D graphic performance, it might be significant.

Do you mean undervolting using the curve optimizer ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, ShrimpBrime said:

Your score seems decent in my opinion. Guessing that your system isn't optimized solely for running benchmarks, 18310 pts isn't bad. But isn't a great score either. 

 

Work on higher Memory : Infinity Fabric speeds (1:1). Tight timings and latency won't matter a great deal with this particular benchmark, so loosen up and go for the bandwidth.

I will try that, about what optimizations are you talking about ? 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Bootyman said:

I will try that, about what optimizations are you talking about ? 

 

It's all the little things. Like turning off background apps and services that aren't needed. Disable core parking could be another thing to try. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×