Does lga 2011 overclock better?

[CAT]

the title says it all. do lga 2011 cpus overclock better because they are larger and do not have any integrated graphics crap incised of them?

fo a comparison let's say the

4770k http://www.newegg.ca/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819116901

vs

4820k http://www.newegg.ca/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819116940

and also the lga 2011 is cheaper because it doesn't come with that crappy cooler

[Ryan Leech]

The 4829K overclocks better because it's not Haswell

[Cacao]

Yes, I would say they are generally more overclockable than the LGA 1150 platform because they don't have that crappy thermal paste between the dye and the heat spreader and they are Sany bridge/Ivy bridge CPUs so they run cooler.

[BrightCandle]

With SB v SB-E it actually favoured the SB core, which for most people would do > 4.5Ghz, but SB-E typically tops out around 4.4Ghz for most owners.

IB v IB-E was less clear as IB didn't overclock as well as SB but IB-E also overclocked less well than SB-E.

So I suspect that Haswell-E will overclock less well than Haswell, that is the trend so far.

[Blade of Grass]

It would probably be less due to the iGPU, and more to do with the soldered on IHS (enthusiast processors) vs. thermal paste connection to the IHS (consumer processors).

[ViruZ_HUN]

Yes, I would say they are generally more overclockable than the LGA 1150 platform because they don't have that crappy thermal paste between the dye and the heat spreader and they are Sany bridge/Ivy bridge CPUs so they run cooler.

Trust this guy @Cacao

 

He is pro LGA 2011er

[jezza39]

4770K has roughly 10% improvement in IPC, so 4.5GHz 4770K > 4.8GHz 4820K