Jump to content

i5 10600K or Ryzen 3600

Ryzen 3600 or i5 10600K  

13 members have voted

  1. 1. Ryzen 3600 or i5 10600K

    • Ryzen 3600
      5
    • i5 10600K
      8


which one should i chose? Is the Ryzen still worth it in late 2020? Or should i go with the newer i5 10600K?

Answers are appreciated!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Rubrix said:

which one should i chose? Is the Ryzen still worth it in late 2020? Or should i go with the newer i5 10600K?

Answers are appreciated!

Well, if you can wait a bit go for the R5 5600 when it comes out.

 

Other than that, the 10600K is better for gaming, and the R5 3600 for price/performance.

My Gaming PC:
Inno3D iChill Black - RTX 4080 - +500 Memory, undervolted Core, 2xCorsair QX120 (push) + 2xInno3D 120mm (pull)
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D - NZXT x72
G.SKILL Trident Z @6000MHz CL30 - 2x16GB
Asus Strix X670E-E Gaming

1x500GB Samsung 960 Pro (Windows 11)

1x2TB Kingston KC3000 (Games)

1x1TB WD Blue SN550 (Programs)

1x1TB Samsung 870 EVO (Programs)
Corsair RM-850X

Lian Li O11 Vision
ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27AQDM (240hz OLED), MSI Optix MAG274QRFDE-QD, BenQ ZOWIE XL2720

Logitech G Pro Wireless Superlight
Wooting 60HE

Audeze LCD2-C + FiiO K3

Klipsch RP600-M + Klipsch R-120 SW

 

My Notebook:

MacBook Pro 16 M1 - 16GB

 

Proxmox-Cluster:

  • Ryzen 9 3950X, Asus Strix X570E F-Gaming, 2x32GB3200MHz ECC, 2x 512GB NVMe ZFS-Mirror (Boot + Testing-VMs), 2x14TB ZFS-Mirror + 1x3TB (TrueNAS-VM), 1x 1TB Samsung 980 Pro NVMe (Ceph-OSD), 10G NIC
  • i7 8700k delidded undervolted, Gigabyte Z390 UD, 4x16GB 3200MHz, 1x 512GB SSD (Boot), 1x 1TB Samsung 980 Pro NVMe (Ceph-OSD), 2,5G NIC
  • i5 4670, 3x4GB + 1x8GB 1600MHz, 1x 512GB SSD (Boot), 1x 1TB Samsung 980 Pro NVMe (Ceph-OSD), 2,5G NIC

Proxmox-Backup-Server:

  • i5 4670, 4x4GB 1600MHz, 2x2TB ZFS-Mirror, 2,5G NIC
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Noah0302 said:

Well, if you can wait a bit go for the R5 5600 when it comes out.

 

Other than that, the 10600K is better for gaming, and the R5 3600 for price/performance.

The problem is that my current RAM isn't fast enough to unleash the 5600's full potential (16GB ddr4 2133MHz)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Rubrix said:

The problem is that my current RAM isn't fast enough to unleash the 5600's full potential (16GB ddr4 2133MHz)

That kind of RAM will impact every CPU to some degree, so Im pretty sure that going for the faster CPU first and then upgrading your RAM later will make the most sense.

 

A good kit of RAM is not that expensive anymore. Where I live I can sometimes get 3200MHz CL16 for about 50€, which you can maybe even OC to 3400+ or tighten the timings

My Gaming PC:
Inno3D iChill Black - RTX 4080 - +500 Memory, undervolted Core, 2xCorsair QX120 (push) + 2xInno3D 120mm (pull)
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D - NZXT x72
G.SKILL Trident Z @6000MHz CL30 - 2x16GB
Asus Strix X670E-E Gaming

1x500GB Samsung 960 Pro (Windows 11)

1x2TB Kingston KC3000 (Games)

1x1TB WD Blue SN550 (Programs)

1x1TB Samsung 870 EVO (Programs)
Corsair RM-850X

Lian Li O11 Vision
ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27AQDM (240hz OLED), MSI Optix MAG274QRFDE-QD, BenQ ZOWIE XL2720

Logitech G Pro Wireless Superlight
Wooting 60HE

Audeze LCD2-C + FiiO K3

Klipsch RP600-M + Klipsch R-120 SW

 

My Notebook:

MacBook Pro 16 M1 - 16GB

 

Proxmox-Cluster:

  • Ryzen 9 3950X, Asus Strix X570E F-Gaming, 2x32GB3200MHz ECC, 2x 512GB NVMe ZFS-Mirror (Boot + Testing-VMs), 2x14TB ZFS-Mirror + 1x3TB (TrueNAS-VM), 1x 1TB Samsung 980 Pro NVMe (Ceph-OSD), 10G NIC
  • i7 8700k delidded undervolted, Gigabyte Z390 UD, 4x16GB 3200MHz, 1x 512GB SSD (Boot), 1x 1TB Samsung 980 Pro NVMe (Ceph-OSD), 2,5G NIC
  • i5 4670, 3x4GB + 1x8GB 1600MHz, 1x 512GB SSD (Boot), 1x 1TB Samsung 980 Pro NVMe (Ceph-OSD), 2,5G NIC

Proxmox-Backup-Server:

  • i5 4670, 4x4GB 1600MHz, 2x2TB ZFS-Mirror, 2,5G NIC
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Noah0302 said:

That kind of RAM will impact every CPU to some degree, so Im pretty sure that going for the faster CPU first and then upgrading your RAM later will make the most sense.

 

A good kit of RAM is not that expensive anymore. Where I live I can sometimes get 3200MHz CL16 for about 50€, which you can maybe even OC to 3400+ or tighten the timings

so i should just buy the i5 10600K and then upgrade my ram later?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Rubrix said:

so i should just buy the i5 10600K and then upgrade my ram later?

If you're on a budget go for the 3600. If you can wait a bit go for the 5600X that will come out early november. It will perform better than a 10600K at the same price. Just don't buy a 10600K now when the 5600X is right around the corner. Until then maybe save up for a 16GB 3600MHz cl16 ram kit for about 75$.

If someone did not use reason to reach their conclusion in the first place, you cannot use reason to convince them otherwise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Stahlmann said:

If you're on a budget go for the 3600. If you can wait a bit go for the 5600X that will come out early november. It will perform better than a 10600K at the same price. Just don't buy a 10600K now when the 5600X is right around the corner. Until then maybe save up for a 16GB 3600MHz cl16 ram kit for about 75$.

lol 5600x will never outperform the 5ghz+ beast 10600k, which will also be 50$ cheaper. Also Intel Mobos are cheaper too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Stahlmann said:

It will perform better than a 10600K at the same price

Glad to know your crystal ball is working and being AMD positive like it absolutely must be. AMD good btw

Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler

^-^

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, MS1993 said:

lol 5600x will never outperform the 5ghz+ beast 10600k, which will also be 50$ cheaper. Also Intel Mobos are cheaper too.

In my country the 5600x and 10600K are exactly the same price and they will probably have around the same performance. Maybe one is a little faster then the other. But the difference for me is that the 5600x has a cooler included and that saves me a lot of money

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Does the new Ryzen chip suffer from higher memory latency (relative to Intels most recent offerings)?

 

 

Hardware and Overclocking Enthusiast
 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Storm-Chaser said:

Does the new Ryzen chip suffer from higher memory latency (relative to Intels most recent offerings)?

 

 

Why are you asking here? Literally noone knows outside of AMD.

Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler

^-^

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Elisis said:

Why are you asking here? Literally noone knows outside of AMD.

 

4 minutes ago, Storm-Chaser said:

Does the new Ryzen chip suffer from higher memory latency (relative to Intels most recent offerings)?

 

 

judging from the past it probably will, but only time will tell

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Elisis said:

Why are you asking here? Literally noone knows outside of AMD.

I wasnt sure if there were benchmark leaks or ES samples and I'm not badmouthing the AMD offering, just curious about it's memory performance relative to Intel. But IMO judging how AMD has improved the architecture over the past few  years I would probably go with the Ryzen chip over the Intel to switch it up. Not like Im partial to one or the other, I have many CPUs from both manufacturers. 

Hardware and Overclocking Enthusiast
 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, MS1993 said:

lol 5600x will never outperform the 5ghz+ beast 10600k, which will also be 50$ cheaper.

Also @Elisis: It's not that far fetched seeing how the generational improvements for AMD have been. The current 3600 is maybe 10% behind (worst case) in gaming compared to a 10600K. And with the 5600X's 19% higher IPC and slightly higher clock speeds it's not really "crystal ball" stuff to expect it to outperform the 10600K IMO. Also the 10600K is currently selling for 275$, which is 25$ cheaper than the 5600X launch price. It has been sold at 300$ in the past though. Combine the 10600K's price with a Z490 board it's about the same cost as a 5600X + B450 board will be.

46 minutes ago, MS1993 said:

Also Intel Mobos are cheaper too.

Idk where you have the illusion of cheaper Intel mobos from. For a 10600K you'd want to have at least a Z490 board (cheapest ATX board is 130$). If you want the same feature set as Z490 on AMD you'd have to go for B450 where the cheapest ATX board starts at 90$. And B550 is actually a feature-richer chipset than Z490 so i won't compare these prices.

 

If someone did not use reason to reach their conclusion in the first place, you cannot use reason to convince them otherwise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Stahlmann said:

If you want the same feature set as Z490 on AMD you'd have to go for B450

What?! Z490 isn't comparable to B450...

uikcg3hVXONqfMDf.jpg?width=1289&height=617

 

QqasuJULfEVDjH8WiDt7dG-1200-80.jpg?width=639&height=618

Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler

^-^

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Stahlmann said:

If you want the same feature set as Z490 on AMD you'd have to go for B450 where the cheapest ATX board starts at 90$. And B550 is actually a feature-richer chipset than Z490 so i won't compare these prices.

16115958.jpg.da3b5ff60504ee9d8cfc56769c970033.jpg

Desktop: Intel Core i9-9900K | ASUS Strix Z390-F | G.Skill Trident Z Neo 2x16GB 3200MHz CL14 | EVGA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER XC Ultra | Corsair RM650x | Fractal Design Define R6

Laptop: 2018 Apple MacBook Pro 13"  --  i5-8259U | 8GB LPDDR3 | 512GB NVMe

Peripherals: Leopold FC660C w/ Topre Silent 45g | Logitech MX Master 3 & Razer Basilisk X HyperSpeed | HIFIMAN HE400se & iFi ZEN DAC | Audio-Technica AT2020USB+

Display: Gigabyte G34WQC

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Elisis said:

 

13 minutes ago, Mateyyy said:

 

Yeah i didn't exactly mean what they're technically capable of. I meant what features make a difference to the end user. B450 has all the features any normal user would need. Just like Z490.

 

If you would want the next significant upgrade for anyone who can even leverage it, you'd need B550/X570 for PCIe Gen 4. That's the reason these 2 are in another chipset "Tier" imo.

If someone did not use reason to reach their conclusion in the first place, you cannot use reason to convince them otherwise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Stahlmann said:

If you would want the next significant upgrade for anyone who can even leverage it, you'd need B550/X570 for PCIe Gen 4. That's the reason these 2 are in another chipset "Tier" imo.

Ah, of course, because it's not as though Z490 has PCIe 4.0, or anything /s

Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler
Spoiler

^-^

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Stahlmann said:

Yeah i didn't exactly mean what they're technically capable of. I meant what features make a difference to the end user. B450 has all the features any normal customer would need. Just like Z490.

 

If you would want the next significant upgrade for anyone who can even leverage it, you'd need B550/X570 for PCIe Gen 4. That's the reason these 2 are in another chipset "Tier" imo.

B550 is not in any way different from Z490 when it comes to PCIe 4.0.

Desktop: Intel Core i9-9900K | ASUS Strix Z390-F | G.Skill Trident Z Neo 2x16GB 3200MHz CL14 | EVGA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER XC Ultra | Corsair RM650x | Fractal Design Define R6

Laptop: 2018 Apple MacBook Pro 13"  --  i5-8259U | 8GB LPDDR3 | 512GB NVMe

Peripherals: Leopold FC660C w/ Topre Silent 45g | Logitech MX Master 3 & Razer Basilisk X HyperSpeed | HIFIMAN HE400se & iFi ZEN DAC | Audio-Technica AT2020USB+

Display: Gigabyte G34WQC

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Elisis said:

Ah, of course, because it's not as though Z490 has PCIe 4.0, or anything /s

1 minute ago, Mateyyy said:

B550 is not in any way different from Z490 when it comes to PCIe 4.0.

Okay i didn't know about Z490 actually supporting PCIe 4.0. Sorry about the misinformation.

 

Still, my argument still stands that you get cheaper mobos on the AMD platform when comparing Z490 to B550 and thus the cheaper 10600K will cost about the same as a 5600X if you include the mobo.

 

And even if the availability of Zen3 CPUs is low or the reviews show underperforming chips compared to the announcement, OP can still buy a 10600K. I was merely making the point to wait and not buy a 10600K now.

If someone did not use reason to reach their conclusion in the first place, you cannot use reason to convince them otherwise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Stahlmann said:

Still, my argument still stands that you get cheaper mobos on the AMD platform when comparing Z490 to B550 and thus the cheaper 10600K will cost about the same as a 5600X if you include the mobo.

True.

Spoiler
PCPartPicker Part List
Type Item Price
CPU Intel Core i5-10600K 4.1 GHz 6-Core Processor $274.89 @ B&H
Motherboard MSI Z490-A PRO ATX LGA1200 Motherboard $159.98 @ Newegg
  Prices include shipping, taxes, rebates, and discounts  
  Total $434.87
  Generated by PCPartPicker 2020-10-19 05:09 EDT-0400  

 

PCPartPicker Part List
Type Item Price
Motherboard MSI B550-A PRO ATX AM4 Motherboard $139.99 @ Amazon
Custom Ryzen 5 5600X $299.00
  Prices include shipping, taxes, rebates, and discounts  
  Total $438.99
  Generated by PCPartPicker 2020-10-19 05:11 EDT-0400  

 

Though I think that Intel cutting Comet Lake-S pricing when Zen 3 comes out is very much a possibility.

 

22 minutes ago, Stahlmann said:

And even if the availability of Zen3 CPUs is low or the reviews show underperforming chips compared to the announcement, OP can still buy a 10600K. I was merely making the point to wait and not buy a 10600K now.

I agree, waiting for reviews on Zen 3 would be the way to go in order to make the best purchasing decision. Unless waiting a couple more weeks is a problem for OP.

Desktop: Intel Core i9-9900K | ASUS Strix Z390-F | G.Skill Trident Z Neo 2x16GB 3200MHz CL14 | EVGA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER XC Ultra | Corsair RM650x | Fractal Design Define R6

Laptop: 2018 Apple MacBook Pro 13"  --  i5-8259U | 8GB LPDDR3 | 512GB NVMe

Peripherals: Leopold FC660C w/ Topre Silent 45g | Logitech MX Master 3 & Razer Basilisk X HyperSpeed | HIFIMAN HE400se & iFi ZEN DAC | Audio-Technica AT2020USB+

Display: Gigabyte G34WQC

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Waiting for reviews of the Zen 3 is the way to go. Until then here is my experience in the game PUBG:

  • Here in Serbia the flagship z490 tomahawk is priced the same as b550 tomahawk.
  • Around 15 of my friends and me are playing PUBG and talking on Discord for a year now, so I have experience on how all of their systems work in this game.
  • Intel is more stable here, less crushes.
  • r5 3600 is on par with 9400 here.
  • My previous 9600k on 4.6 had 15% FPS gain compared to my 9400. Just imagine what 10600k would do with 5.1 here...
  • When changing RAM from default speed of ~2100/2400 mhz to 3600mhz cl 15 there was a 50% fps increase.

 

So when it comes to super CPU and RAM demanding games like PUBG, overclocking everything (cpu, ram, cache) will yield huge gains.

Here is the Gamers Nexus example with less demanding single player games:


Based on that you can only imagine the power in games like PUBG...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×