i7 9700k thermal throttling at 4.5 mhz

[Guest]

5 minutes ago, xg32 said:

i would love to see a chip getting 5.2 cache, doesn't happen, steve got a chip that couldnt even hit 4.8

Here you go. No it's not 5.2ghz. Its 5.1ghz.

 

https://hwbot.org/submission/4499547_

[Guest]

Just now, Abraxas8900 said:

so what do i use for a cpu frequency of 4.5 on the cpu cache ratio?

 

1.1v is fine Vccio and Vccia

[xg32]

1 minute ago, ShrimpBrime said:

Here you go. No it's not 5.2ghz. Its 5.1ghz.

 

https://hwbot.org/submission/4499547_

ya it's running on 1.5v, and it's just a screenshot of cpu-z

[Abraxas8900]

so 4.5 cache ration is fine as long as the cpu vccio voltage is at 1.1v

[Guest]

3 minutes ago, xg32 said:

ya it's running on 1.5v, and it's just a screenshot of cpu-z

Click the screen shot below where all the cpuz tabs are open.

 

Then

 

Take note the date top left side of the submission. 

 

And that cpu was running 5.3ghz. 

 

The submission is for DDR4 frequency with Cas 15.

 

Damn man. What's your gig? You say it's not possible and then bam. There it is.

[Abraxas8900]

so the cpu vccio voltage was causing the overheating of the cpu?

 

[xg32]

2 minutes ago, ShrimpBrime said:

Click the screen shot below where all the cpuz tabs are open.

 

Then

 

Take note the date top left side of the submission. 

 

And that cpu was running 5.3ghz. 

 

The submission is for DDR4 frequency with Cas 15.

 

Damn man. What's your gig? You day it's not possible and then bam. There it is.

my point was not what score u got lol, you advising someone to push 4.8 cache or even 5.2 is just irresponsible lol. nor is telling him 1.1v io/sa without knowing what speed is memory's running at. Also running cache above core freq is just wrong. nice weird flex though

[Guest]

Just now, Abraxas8900 said:

so the cpu vccio voltage was causing the overheating of the cpu?

 

It does add heat. So this is possible.

But these chips are just naturally hot. 

85-90c is a normal temp. No worries until 100c,but should keep it 85c at load if possible.

 

If you still have issues, upgrade the cooler.

[Abraxas8900]

what processes should I use to trouble shoot the cpu overheating?

[Guest]

Just now, xg32 said:

my point was not what score u got lol, you advising someone to push 4.8 cache or even 5.2 is just irresponsible lol. nor is telling him 1.1v io/sa without knowing what speed is memory's running at. Also running cache above core freq is just wrong. nice weird flex though

Again. You said not possible. I only showed YOU the possibility.

 

And my response to @TofuHaroto was that overclocking cache does bring performance.

Go back read the thread again.

 

You gave bullshit value of 1.25v Vccio. He only needs 1.1v and not to exceed 1.2v.

 

[xg32]

Just now, Abraxas8900 said:

what processes should I use to trouble shoot the cpu overheating?

cinebench r15 and r20 below 100C is the absolute minimum, run each 3-5x in a row, if you do video editing, bench with blender.

[Guest]

1 minute ago, Abraxas8900 said:

what processes should I use to trouble shoot the cpu overheating?

Monitor the temperature of the cpu while under a full load. If you hit 100c, it's too hot.

[Abraxas8900]

Just now, xg32 said:

 nor is telling him 1.1v io/sa without knowing what speed is memory's running at. Also running cache above core freq is just wrong. nice weird flex though

my memory is running at 3200

[xg32]

3 minutes ago, ShrimpBrime said:

Again. You said not possible. I only showed YOU the possibility.

 

And my response to @TofuHaroto was that overclocking cache does bring performance.

Go back read the thread again.

 

You gave bullshit value of 1.25v Vccio. He only needs 1.1v and not to exceed 1.2v.

 

ur running 5.3 core with 5.1 cache, which is still cache below core, still witing on that 5.2 cache, don't fry ur cpu in the process tho

 

1.1v isnt enough for some cases, which is again unresponsible advice. 1.25v is reasonable since that's the stock on some boards, while 1.1v introduces instability on some systems,

[Abraxas8900]

the dram is at 3190.4 Mhz

[xg32]

Just now, Abraxas8900 said:

the dram is at 3190.4 Mhz

then 1.15v is enough

[Guest]

Just now, xg32 said:

ur running 5.3 core with 5.1 cache, which is still cache below core, still witing on that 5.2 cache, don't fry ur cpu in the process tho

 

1.1v isnt enough for some cases, which is again unresponsible advice.

Well considering my geothermal loop allows my overclocks, I highly doubt Shrimps chip will fry any time soon.

 

Other way around. 1.1v is usually enough for most cases.

 

And dont tell me what responsible is and isnt. Just take proven wrong nicely and we carry on.

 

And who the fuck is Steve? Do tell!! Maybe I can help him overclock or perhaps even test his cpu for him. I'm well equipped.

[Abraxas8900]

Just now, xg32 said:

then 1.15v is enough

so what cache ratio should I use on the cpu or can you show me the math to calulate it.

[xg32]

1 minute ago, ShrimpBrime said:

Well considering my geothermal loop allows my overclocks, I highly doubt Shrimps chip will fry any time soon.

 

Other way around. 1.1v is usually enough for most cases.

 

And dont tell me what responsible is and isnt. Just take proven wrong nicely and we carry on.

 

And who the fuck is Steve? Do tell!! Maybe I can help him overclock or perhaps even test his cpu for him. I'm well equipped.

u just admited urself that 1.1v isnt always enough, i just want his system to boot, still waiting on proof u can run cache above core btw, every1 on the internet can prove ur wrong on that one, i'm done with this, keep ur head in ur hole lol

[xg32]

Just now, Abraxas8900 said:

so what cache ratio should I use on the cpu or can you show me the math to calulate it.

cache should be 200mhz below ur cpu frequency, running it above ur cpu freq will cause instability, i'm 100% sure about that. This came straight from intel, just search it up on youtube,

[Guest]

Just now, xg32 said:

u just admited urself that 1.1v isnt always enough, i just want his system to boot, still waiting on proof u can run cache above core btw, every1 on the internet can prove ur wrong on that one, i'm done with this, keep ur head in ur hole lol

His system is booting. So far I think he's doing just fine. 

 

Well let me see what I can do for you. Maybe I cant get cache higher than core..... but the OP already did that.... and you said again... not possible.

 

Again dude. Read the thread from the start.

[Abraxas8900]

Just now, xg32 said:

cache should be 200mhz below ur cpu frequency, running it above ur cpu freq will cause instability, i'm 100% sure about that. This came straight from intel, just search it up on youtube,

ill do that bruh 

 

[Abraxas8900]

ok so if i am at 4.5 cpu frequncy then the cache should be at 4.3 right.

[xg32]

1 minute ago, Abraxas8900 said:

ok so if i am at 4.5 cpu frequncy then the cache should be at 4.3 right.

ya, i still think there's something else going on as it shouldnt hit 100C at 4.5, just make sure ur core voltage isnt over 1.25v for 4.5ghz

[Abraxas8900]

well thank you very much I've lowered the cpu vccio to 1.15v and lowered the cpu cache to 4.3. I'm going to beanch test this to see if it still over heats at 4.5 cpu frequency. wish me luck.