Warzone settings

[GeneralGusher]

Hey I am just staring to play warzone and I was wondering what are some good settings for the gtx 1050, that will look good and that won’t drop too low in my FPS 

[Slottr]

About nothing. Everything on low, nothing too fancy

[BrightLuigi]

@Slottr is right, everything on low. 

[Tigerleon]

Put all on low. Disable anti aliasing and turn the resolution scale to 110. Do this because the game is a bit blurry. 

[dizmo]

It can even run on a 1050?

[kirashi]

43 minutes ago, GeneralGusher said:

Hey I am just staring to play warzone and I was wondering what are some good settings for the gtx 1050, that will look good and that won’t drop too low in my FPS 

 

 

 

12 minutes ago, dizmo said:

It can even run on a 1050?

It can, but not great. I used to have a GTX 950, and although Warzone did run on that, it was not a great experience, even on low settings.

 

[dizmo]

3 minutes ago, kirashi said:

It can, but not great. I used to have a GTX 950, and although Warzone did run on that, it was not a great experience, even on low settings.

 

Yeah, my GTX 980 barely does 60 - 70 fps, so I can only imagine a 950/1050.

Doesn't sound like a great time.

[GeneralGusher]

58 minutes ago, dizmo said:

Yeah, my GTX 980 barely does 60 - 70 fps, so I can only imagine a 950/1050.

Doesn't sound like a great time.

I mean tbh its not too bad

[GeneralGusher]

1 hour ago, Tigerleon said:

Put all on low. Disable anti aliasing and turn the resolution scale to 110. Do this because the game is a bit blurry. 

 

1 hour ago, Tigerleon said:

Put all on low. Disable anti aliasing and turn the resolution scale to 110. Do this because the game is a bit blurry. 

ok thanks guys. I just tried it and honestly its not too bad. 

[GeneralGusher]

On 7/8/2020 at 8:59 PM, Tigerleon said:

Put all on low. Disable anti aliasing and turn the resolution scale to 110. Do this because the game is a bit blurry. 

Ok thanks. Just wondering what will happen if I exceed the vram?

[Tigerleon]

9 hours ago, GeneralGusher said:

Ok thanks. Just wondering what will happen if I exceed the vram?

Try and find out. Your GPU wont explode anyways.

[GeneralGusher]

30 minutes ago, Tigerleon said:

Try and find out. Your GPU wont explode anyways.

Ok 

[GeneralGusher]

On 7/11/2020 at 7:08 AM, Tigerleon said:

Try and find out. Your GPU wont explode anyways.

Ok so my game keeps crashing now ever since I went over my vram. Could that be why it’s crashing and if it is, how can I get more vram?

[Tigerleon]

21 minutes ago, GeneralGusher said:

Ok so my game keeps crashing now ever since I went over my vram. Could that be why it’s crashing and if it is, how can I get more vram?

Upgrading GPU. Your graphics card.

[Tigerleon]

You should probably wait for the upcoming graphic cards to release before buying old ones. The price will drop a bit. A good gpu for you is probably the gtx 1660 6gb. 6gb means 6gb vram.

[GeneralGusher]

1 hour ago, Tigerleon said:

You should probably wait for the upcoming graphic cards to release before buying old ones. The price will drop a bit. A good gpu for you is probably the gtx 1660 6gb. 6gb means 6gb vram.

ohh ok thanks

[Mr.Briggs]

I have a 1050ti 4GB (no power connector 75W) core holds ~1700mhz in games

settings wise every thing low/minimum, Except:

V-sync off, frame limit at refresh, for stability

Texture 'Filtering' - put this on high
(textures on very low)
Particle effects on High
(particle lighting low)

Performance wise?

cannot hold 60fps at 1080p, 40-60 typically

im playing on a 1440x900@75Hz monitor (~2/3rds 1080p)

fps sits between 50-100 at this res, so you should expect about 80% of that performance, given that im using a 1050ti and you have a 1050 (80% core count and 75% memory size)

56fps in that screenshot, using 1050ti.

based on my crude math? a 1050 would get about ~45fps in that scenario

[GeneralGusher]

20 hours ago, Mr.Briggs said:

I have a 1050ti 4GB (no power connector 75W) core holds ~1700mhz in games

settings wise every thing low/minimum, Except:

V-sync off, frame limit at refresh, for stability

Texture 'Filtering' - put this on high
(textures on very low)
Particle effects on High
(particle lighting low)

Performance wise?

cannot hold 60fps at 1080p, 40-60 typically

im playing on a 1440x900@75Hz monitor (~2/3rds 1080p)

fps sits between 50-100 at this res, so you should expect about 80% of that performance, given that im using a 1050ti and you have a 1050 (80% core count and 75% memory size)

56fps in that screenshot, using 1050ti.

based on my crude math? a 1050 would get about ~45fps in that scenario

Woah thanks. It actually looks good too. I just tried copying nickmercs settings, and he has a 2080 and I’m actually getting 40-50 FPS. Idk how. Only bad thing is that i went over my vram limit. I’ll try ur settings aswell thanks 

[Mr.Briggs]

3 hours ago, GeneralGusher said:

Woah thanks. It actually looks good too. I just tried copying nickmercs settings, and he has a 2080 and I’m actually getting 40-50 FPS. Idk how. Only bad thing is that i went over my vram limit. I’ll try ur settings aswell thanks 

You're welcome,

just had a look, nickmercs settings are good, but a few things to tweak would be:

to lower texture res, I see better textures at very low than i do at low or normal with 4GB of vram, you may get textureless white box building with no windows due to low vram, so lower options work better for that.

You should also disable tesselation, itll eat your fps.

i personally have texture filtering on high, because on low you cant see through explosions/ dragons breath. this doesnt use more vram, but taxes memory bandwidth.

and i also have particle quality on high,for the same reason

attached screenshot is when textures on normal with low VRAM (4GB)

[GeneralGusher]

11 hours ago, Mr.Briggs said:

You're welcome,

just had a look, nickmercs settings are good, but a few things to tweak would be:

to lower texture res, I see better textures at very low than i do at low or normal with 4GB of vram, you may get textureless white box building with no windows due to low vram, so lower options work better for that.

You should also disable tesselation, itll eat your fps.

i personally have texture filtering on high, because on low you cant see through explosions/ dragons breath. this doesnt use more vram, but taxes memory bandwidth.

and i also have particle quality on high,for the same reason

attached screenshot is when textures on normal with low VRAM (4GB)

Thanks!

[GeneralGusher]

On 7/16/2020 at 10:37 PM, GeneralGusher said:

Woah thanks. It actually looks good too. I just tried copying nickmercs settings, and he has a 2080 and I’m actually getting 40-50 FPS. Idk how. Only bad thing is that i went over my vram limit. I’ll try ur settings aswell thanks 

do you have any more settings? after the new update my vram has been over my max on default settings and on all low settings