Jump to content
21 minutes ago, awesomecdudley said:

good. that means he can upgrade to a better card later. we'll probably overclock.

You got that backwards, they said the 3100 may bottleneck the GPU in which case getting a newer card would likely have zero benefit.

ASUS B650E-F GAMING WIFI + R7 7800X3D + 2x Corsair Vengeance 32GB DDR5-6000 CL30-36-36-76  + ASUS RTX 4090 TUF Gaming OC

Router:  Intel N100 (pfSense) Backup: GL.iNet GL-X3000/ Spitz AX Switches: Netgear MS510TXUP, MS510TXPP, GS110EMX
WiFi6: Zyxel NWA210AX (1.7Gbit peak at 160Mhz) WiFi5: Ubiquiti NanoHD OpenWRT (~500Mbit at 80Mhz)
ISPs: Zen Full Fibre 900 (~930Mbit down, 115Mbit up) + Three 5G (~1200Mbit down, 115Mbit up, variable)
Upgrading Laptop/Desktop CNVIo WiFi 5 cards to PCIe WiFi6e/7

Link to post
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, awesomecdudley said:

good. that means he can upgrade to a better card later. we'll probably overclock.

Yeah like @Alex Atkin UK said, you got that backwards. If you/he upgrade in the future, you should upgrade the cpu first, not the graphics card.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, The_russian said:

Yeah like @Alex Atkin UK said, you got that backwards. If you/he upgrade in the future, you should upgrade the cpu first, not the graphics card.

my bad. I can't read. If I overclock it to match the 3300X, would it make a difference?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, awesomecdudley said:

my bad. I can't read. If I overclock it to match the 3300X, would it make a difference?

 

You can't overclock a 3100 to match a 3300X, not possible. The 3300X runs a 4+0 core configuration with everything on one CCD, on one CCX, while the 3100 runs a 2+2 configuration on two CCXs on that CCD. So the performance will never be equal no matter how much you overclock the 3100.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Promosss said:

You can't overclock a 3100 to match a 3300X, not possible. The 3300X runs a 4+0 core configuration with everything on one CCD, on one CCX, while the 3100 runs a 2+2 configuration on two CCXs on that CCD. So the performance will never be equal no matter how much you overclock the 3100.

rewording then, if I get a 3300X is it still bottlenecked

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Promosss said:

Nope, the 3300x won't bottleneck a 2060.

Personally I'd still want at least 6 real cores, I saw a huge improvement in frame rate stability going from 4 to 6 and then 6 to 8.  Granted, I'm on a 2080 but I think it did when I was on a 1070 Ti too.

ASUS B650E-F GAMING WIFI + R7 7800X3D + 2x Corsair Vengeance 32GB DDR5-6000 CL30-36-36-76  + ASUS RTX 4090 TUF Gaming OC

Router:  Intel N100 (pfSense) Backup: GL.iNet GL-X3000/ Spitz AX Switches: Netgear MS510TXUP, MS510TXPP, GS110EMX
WiFi6: Zyxel NWA210AX (1.7Gbit peak at 160Mhz) WiFi5: Ubiquiti NanoHD OpenWRT (~500Mbit at 80Mhz)
ISPs: Zen Full Fibre 900 (~930Mbit down, 115Mbit up) + Three 5G (~1200Mbit down, 115Mbit up, variable)
Upgrading Laptop/Desktop CNVIo WiFi 5 cards to PCIe WiFi6e/7

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Alex Atkin UK said:

Personally I'd still want at least 6 real cores, I saw a huge improvement in frame rate reliability going from 4 to 6 and then 6 to 8.  Granted, I'm on a 2080 but I think it did when I was on a 1070 Ti too.

Yeah, I'm thinking maybe a 3600/X or a 2600/X. We could get it to match the 3300X in clock.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, awesomecdudley said:

Yeah, I'm thinking maybe a 3600/X or a 2600/X. We could get it to match the 3300X in clock.

Basically my thinking is, look at what the new consoles have for CPUs.  That is likely to show us the direction games will be going.  You can perhaps get away with having less cores if they are faster ones, but certainly if you want any kind of future proofing its worth thinking about carefully.

ASUS B650E-F GAMING WIFI + R7 7800X3D + 2x Corsair Vengeance 32GB DDR5-6000 CL30-36-36-76  + ASUS RTX 4090 TUF Gaming OC

Router:  Intel N100 (pfSense) Backup: GL.iNet GL-X3000/ Spitz AX Switches: Netgear MS510TXUP, MS510TXPP, GS110EMX
WiFi6: Zyxel NWA210AX (1.7Gbit peak at 160Mhz) WiFi5: Ubiquiti NanoHD OpenWRT (~500Mbit at 80Mhz)
ISPs: Zen Full Fibre 900 (~930Mbit down, 115Mbit up) + Three 5G (~1200Mbit down, 115Mbit up, variable)
Upgrading Laptop/Desktop CNVIo WiFi 5 cards to PCIe WiFi6e/7

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Alex Atkin UK said:

Basically my thinking is, look at what the new consoles have for CPUs.  That is likely to show us the direction games will be going.  You can perhaps get away with having less cores if they are faster ones, but certainly if you want any kind of future proofing its worth thinking about carefully.

That makes sense. I totally see what you mean. If I can slip an 8 core in the build, I will.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, awesomecdudley said:

That makes sense. I totally see what you mean. If I can slip an 8 core in the build, I will.

Of course a few years down the line, you can always upgrade the CPU to the maximum the board can handle.  It really depends how long you want the build to work before an upgrade.

Going AMD is more future proof in itself I think, simply down to them being able to handle faster SSDs once available.

ASUS B650E-F GAMING WIFI + R7 7800X3D + 2x Corsair Vengeance 32GB DDR5-6000 CL30-36-36-76  + ASUS RTX 4090 TUF Gaming OC

Router:  Intel N100 (pfSense) Backup: GL.iNet GL-X3000/ Spitz AX Switches: Netgear MS510TXUP, MS510TXPP, GS110EMX
WiFi6: Zyxel NWA210AX (1.7Gbit peak at 160Mhz) WiFi5: Ubiquiti NanoHD OpenWRT (~500Mbit at 80Mhz)
ISPs: Zen Full Fibre 900 (~930Mbit down, 115Mbit up) + Three 5G (~1200Mbit down, 115Mbit up, variable)
Upgrading Laptop/Desktop CNVIo WiFi 5 cards to PCIe WiFi6e/7

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×