Jump to content

Wired + Wireless Router Configuration

FrankV

In relation to the below question (but different) is there any reason I can't (or shouldn't) do cable modem -> wired switch router -> { wireless router -> {wireless devices}, gaming computer } ? Where { ... } indicates 2..n devices?

 

Put another way, can I put a wired router connected to two devices, one being a wireless router (Orbi) and the second being a computer?

 

Edited: Changed from wired router to wired switch per suggestion.

Edited by FrankV
Changed from wired router to wired switch per suggestion.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Double NAT is usually not advised, unless you only use the LAN ports of your second router.  Then it's not performing routing functions but is a switch with an access point.

PC : 3600 · Crosshair VI WiFi · 2x16GB RGB 3200 · 1080Ti SC2 · 1TB WD SN750 · EVGA 1600G2 · Define C 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, beersykins said:

Double NAT is usually not advised, unless you only use the LAN ports of your second router.  Then it's not performing routing functions but is a switch with an access point.

The second router - the wireless one, in my case - doesn't have anything plugged in to it. It'd just be the wireless access point. 

 

Regardless, if a switch would be better in place of the (proposed) "wired router", that should be cheaper....

 

Does a switch not do NAT whereas a router does do NAT? (NAT = network address translation, to be clear?)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, FrankV said:

Does a switch not do NAT whereas a router does do NAT? (NAT = network address translation, to be clear?)

Correct.  If you connected the second router via the WAN port then your wireless clients will be behind a NAT layer towards router 1.  If you use the LAN interface then everyone will be on the same broadcast domain/network.

 

If you're rolling the router approach you probably want to give it a static LAN address different than the first one and disable DHCP just on the second router.

PC : 3600 · Crosshair VI WiFi · 2x16GB RGB 3200 · 1080Ti SC2 · 1TB WD SN750 · EVGA 1600G2 · Define C 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, beersykins said:

Correct.  If you connected the second router via the WAN port then your wireless clients will be behind a NAT layer towards router 1.  If you use the LAN interface then everyone will be on the same broadcast domain/network.

 

If you're rolling the router approach you probably want to give it a static LAN address different than the first one and disable DHCP just on the second router.

Thanks. But to clarify, this is not at all a concern if I use a switch? It becomes much more straightforward? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many wireless routers can be switched to Access Point only mode, do that.

You want only one router, and it usually has to be just behind your modem unless you have a special ISP plan.

F@H
Desktop: i9-13900K, ASUS Z790-E, 64GB DDR5-6000 CL36, RTX3080, 2TB MP600 Pro XT, 2TB SX8200Pro, 2x16TB Ironwolf RAID0, Corsair HX1200, Antec Vortex 360 AIO, Thermaltake Versa H25 TG, Samsung 4K curved 49" TV, 23" secondary, Mountain Everest Max

Mobile SFF rig: i9-9900K, Noctua NH-L9i, Asrock Z390 Phantom ITX-AC, 32GB, GTX1070, 2x1TB SX8200Pro RAID0, 2x5TB 2.5" HDD RAID0, Athena 500W Flex (Noctua fan), Custom 4.7l 3D printed case

 

Asus Zenbook UM325UA, Ryzen 7 5700u, 16GB, 1TB, OLED

 

GPD Win 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Kilrah said:

Many wireless routers can be switched to Access Point only mode, do that.

You want only one router, and it usually has to be just behind your modem unless you have a special ISP plan.

 

I'm interested in elaboration to learn more but that said, I've confirmed my Orbi system (current wireless router running the house) has access point mode (as you would expect). So, can I just take an older wireless router and use that (disabling the wireless radio in that one?) Or is it better to get a modern (new) one? 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes that's fine as long as it's good enough to deal with your home's traffic.

F@H
Desktop: i9-13900K, ASUS Z790-E, 64GB DDR5-6000 CL36, RTX3080, 2TB MP600 Pro XT, 2TB SX8200Pro, 2x16TB Ironwolf RAID0, Corsair HX1200, Antec Vortex 360 AIO, Thermaltake Versa H25 TG, Samsung 4K curved 49" TV, 23" secondary, Mountain Everest Max

Mobile SFF rig: i9-9900K, Noctua NH-L9i, Asrock Z390 Phantom ITX-AC, 32GB, GTX1070, 2x1TB SX8200Pro RAID0, 2x5TB 2.5" HDD RAID0, Athena 500W Flex (Noctua fan), Custom 4.7l 3D printed case

 

Asus Zenbook UM325UA, Ryzen 7 5700u, 16GB, 1TB, OLED

 

GPD Win 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×