Jump to content

R7 2700x or R5 3600 or i5 9600kf

I want to upgrade my cpu but dont know to witch one. The r7 2700x cost 175 euros in my region (the netherlands) and the i5 9600kf and r5 3600 are both 200 euros. My gpu is a rtx 2060.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2700x imo offers you the most flexibility and if you are running 1440p I would choose that, personally over the 3600.

 

The 9600kf is a waste imo.

Before you reply to my post, REFRESH. 99.99% chance I edited my post. 

 

My System: i7-13700KF // Corsair iCUE H150i Elite Capellix // MSI MPG Z690 Edge Wifi // 32GB DDR5 G. SKILL RIPJAWS S5 6000 CL32 // Nvidia RTX 4070 Super FE // Corsair 5000D Airflow // Corsair SP120 RGB Pro x7 // Seasonic Focus Plus Gold 850w //1TB ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro/1TB Teamgroup MP33/2TB Seagate 7200RPM Hard Drive // Displays: LG Ultragear 32GP83B x2 // Royal Kludge RK100 // Logitech G Pro X Superlight // Sennheiser DROP PC38x

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

For games? The R5 3600 is better than R7 2700X.

Depending on what games you play the i5 9600kf will likely give you highest FPS out of all of these but it will actually struggle in some more thread demanding games and cause stuttering. 

The R5 3600 is a better choice imo but if you just strive for max FPS in eSports games then get the i5. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

for 99% of users out there, especially gamers the R5 3600 is the better choice...the cores are noticeably stronger and faster than the old ryzen 2700...and the core i5 simply doesn't have enough threads for some modern games.

| CPU: Core i7-8700K @ 4.89ghz - 1.21v  Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z370-E GAMING  CPU Cooler: Corsair H100i V2 |
| GPU: MSI RTX 3080Ti Ventus 3X OC  RAM: 32GB T-Force Delta RGB 3066mhz |
| Displays: Acer Predator XB270HU 1440p Gsync 144hz IPS Gaming monitor | Oculus Quest 2 VR

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Historically we are seeing that less resources causes more performance hits than slightly slower overall IPC.

 

I look at performance milestones. The 3600 doesn't REALLY hit any performance milestones the 2700x can't. The 3600 can do high refresh for now, but I wouldn't count on that for many more years. Back in 2017 was a different story, with as much as a 40% difference in single threaded performance between say an 8700k and a Ryzen 7 1700. In that case for sure the 30-40% increased single threaded jump was worth the loss of 2 cores.

 

When Ryzen 2000 launched, it became an even more compelling option with differences between the 8700k and 2600 closing to within 20%. With Ryzen 3000 still failing to catch Intel single threaded performance, it's a fair assessment I feel to make the same comparison between 2000 and Intel and 2000 and 3000.

 

I think that by the time 2nd gen Ryzen is too slow to run games at meaningful milestones, so will 3rd gens, and the additional 33% resources might be more helpful overall than a little IPC.

 

There's no way to know for sure, but that's my roll of the dice.

Before you reply to my post, REFRESH. 99.99% chance I edited my post. 

 

My System: i7-13700KF // Corsair iCUE H150i Elite Capellix // MSI MPG Z690 Edge Wifi // 32GB DDR5 G. SKILL RIPJAWS S5 6000 CL32 // Nvidia RTX 4070 Super FE // Corsair 5000D Airflow // Corsair SP120 RGB Pro x7 // Seasonic Focus Plus Gold 850w //1TB ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro/1TB Teamgroup MP33/2TB Seagate 7200RPM Hard Drive // Displays: LG Ultragear 32GP83B x2 // Royal Kludge RK100 // Logitech G Pro X Superlight // Sennheiser DROP PC38x

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×