low fps in battlefield 1

[budgetguy]

I have a gtx 1060 i5 7500 16GB ram but get 40-50 fps in battlefield 1. This isn't normal is it? what could cause it?

[Skiiwee29]

Yes, 4c/4t in a CPU bound game... sounds about right. 

[budgetguy]

2 minutes ago, Skiiwee29 said:

Yes, 4c/4t in a CPU bound game... sounds about right. 

4c/4t??

also my friend has a gtx 1060 with a i5 4460 and he gets 70-80 fps + i looked up reviews using my specs and they all say around 80 fps

 

[Paul Rudd]

24 minutes ago, budgetguy said:

This isn't normal is it? what could cause it?

Not normal, but common. I achieve 105-125 fps using an older 6th gen i5 clocked at 3.0 GHz in 1440p using these settings...

 

You can try 96, 97, 98, 99 or 100 resolution scale since your CPU is better than mine. I set it to 95-99 to take some strain off my CPU. Going any lower makes visuals too blurry, 95-99 are spots that are barely noticeable. Hope this helps.

 

Oh and trust me on the textures at Medium. BF1 is one of the very few games that you can barely notice the difference visually. If you prefer to keep it at Ultra, that's quite alright as it doesn't affect fps that much. I do it because like I said, the visual difference is almost impossible to notice.

[budgetguy]

9 minutes ago, Intransigent said:

Not normal, but common. I achieve 105-125 fps using an older 6th gen i5 clocked at 3.0 GHz in 1440p using these settings...

 

You can try 96, 97, 98, 99 or 100 resolution scale since your CPU is better than mine. I set it to 95-99 to take some strain off my CPU. Going any lower makes visuals too blurry, 95-99 are spots that are barely noticeable. Hope this helps.

 

Oh and trust me on the textures at Medium. BF1 is one of the very few games that you can barely notice the difference visually. If you prefer to keep it at Ultra, that's quite alright as it doesn't affect fps that much. I do it because like I said, the visual difference is almost impossible to notice.

will try these settings tnx a lot

[Constantin]

20 minutes ago, Intransigent said:

Not normal, but common. I achieve 105-125 fps using an older 6th gen i5 clocked at 3.0 GHz in 1440p using these settings...

 

You can try 96, 97, 98, 99 or 100 resolution scale since your CPU is better than mine. I set it to 95-99 to take some strain off my CPU. Going any lower makes visuals too blurry, 95-99 are spots that are barely noticeable. Hope this helps.

 

Oh and trust me on the textures at Medium. BF1 is one of the very few games that you can barely notice the difference visually. If you prefer to keep it at Ultra, that's quite alright as it doesn't affect fps that much. I do it because like I said, the visual difference is almost impossible to notice.

Mesh Quality, High???? LOL why with this hardware

 

[Paul Rudd]

6 hours ago, Constantin said:

Mesh Quality, High???? LOL why with this hardware

A small fps boost. And because pop-ins are very minimal at both High and Ultra. You can set it higher if you wish, I prefer the small fps boost.

[budgetguy]

afther trying a lot of different settings nothing seems to work. i get the same amout of fps on ultra as on low, i might try to reinstall

[Paul Rudd]

28 minutes ago, budgetguy said:

afther trying a lot of different settings nothing seems to work. i get the same amout of fps on ultra as on low, i might try to reinstall

If there's no change in fps from ultra to low, it's something with your PC causing it. In which you would have to track down on your own.