Signatures

[cyberlocc]

sorry to start another thread but it seems sigs have changed how do you modify the now

[Kilmer02]

Signatures are currently disabled. The ones that are up right now are from VB5 which carried over. No ETA on when they will be enabled.

[cyberlocc]

okay well then im happy its a least there then lol

[snes]

Signatures are currently disabled. The ones that are up right now are from VB5 which carried over. No ETA on when they will be enabled.

 

There are many forums that look god aweful because many of their members don't think before they put a 1024x768 wallpaper in their signature. Maybe you should keep them disabled.

[Guest]

There are many forums that look god aweful because many of their members don't think before they put a 1024x768 wallpaper in their signature. Maybe you should keep them disabled.

They will both be disabled but they are also against the forums code of conduct. 

[Tr3vor]

I think they should be enabled, but have rules, like Atariage. Everyone gets about 3 to 5 lines of text, no images, etc.

[Blade of Grass]

Lol, just realised their's a typo in mine.

 

and who reads the code of conduct anyway :P

[Hans Christian | Teri]

Personally I'm all for disabling signatures, they just clutter up the thread with text that no one really cares about anyways.

[besweeet]

Gah... Mine's listing the wrong video card  :angry:.

[bradscoolio]

I quite like the way my sig migrated :)

[Tommy]

If you enable sigs, they should just be the CPU-Z one, where it has a small window saying your parts and that's it. Now clutter from pictures.

[LinusTech]

Lol, just realised their's a typo in mine.

 

and who reads the code of conduct anyway :P

Everyone I hope :P

 

I like the way sigs are greyed out on the new board. I personally find signatures to be an eyesore on many forums and it's my policy that had them disabled at first, and then limited on the old vBulletin 5 forum. We'll keep evaluating, but there are more important priorities right now and the new forum has sooooo many features that are way cooler than signatures that we're looking into.

[Hans Christian | Teri]

Everyone I hope :P

 

I like the way sigs are greyed out on the new board. I personally find signatures to be an eyesore on many forums and it's my policy that had them disabled at first, and then limited on the old vBulletin 5 forum. We'll keep evaluating, but there are more important priorities right now and the new forum has sooooo many features that are way cooler than signatures that we're looking into.

 

Not to forget that it's actually working properly. :D

[Ghost]

Sigs should just be kept to text only.

 

As a temporary thing they should be removed imo. My one just looks plain ugly and its outdated and wrong.

[BCMods]

I think they should be enabled, but have rules, like Atariage. Everyone gets about 3 to 5 lines of text, no images, etc.

This

[knight_40k]

I would like to see signature kept as a feature for the purpose of posting system specs. But like tr3vor said, limit to text only with about 3-5 lines.

 

I agree that on many forums signatures are an eyesore because of images or long text (like how mine currently is due to being carried over from the previous forum). My layout worked fine on the previous forum because it only showed if you hovered your mouse over the pen icon but now I am ashamed to post having it like this.

 

I would also like to see if you could have some sort of pre made form like box with space for text after each category (ie: cpu, ram, gpu, ssd, etc) added to the user profile page with the ability to have multiple rigs listed. This would be appreciated.

[Guest]

Straight from the CoC;

• Signatures and profile information are limited to the following specifications:
• No signature will exceed 3 lines in length
• No signature or profile will contain an external link other than the label for "website"
• No signature will ask for reputation
• No signature shall have an image
• No signature shall be animated in any way, avatars are allowed to be animated for now.
• Do not append "fake" signatures to your posts if you are unable to have a signature

[Jimbo]

Wrong topic sorry. While I'm here, sigs should be short and sweet, a few lines of text at most.

Edited April 26, 2013 by Jimbo

[HEXiT]

sweet.. i would like an edit Bio button Next plz.

[IdeaStormer]

Oh man, I just puked at the few overboated sig's :blink:

[zeros]

Hmm do I have a signature?

Edit: Crap I do, need to edit it and remove all those spaces. Also I want to remove last sentence which looks like euro and trademarks.

Edit2: Never-mind I was able to edit it :).