Jump to content

I personally think the 12gb and 16gb vram is nonsense. I'm expecting 8gb vram to be honest. Why would Microsoft and Sony do that? Surely it makes more sense to let the console die after 5 or 6 years, and then be able to sell a new console. It wouldn't make sense from a financial standpoint for Microsoft and Sony to pack this thing with vram and let it last ages.

 

And surely Lockhart is better than that. 4 teraflops is like...rx 470 performance? Little bit underwhelming. Unless they are going for a really low budget price point. That must be it. Microsoft are probably looking to really kill Sony on price to get market share back. Microsoft's plan here seems to be to lock Sony in so it doesn't have the best price console, but it also doesn't have the best performance console either. Interesting tactics.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, MeatFeastMan said:

I personally think the 12gb and 16gb vram is nonsense. I'm expecting 8gb vram to be honest. Why would Microsoft and Sony do that? Surely it makes more sense to let the console die after 5 or 6 years, and then be able to sell a new console. It wouldn't make sense from a financial standpoint for Microsoft and Sony to pack this thing with vram and let it last ages.

 

And surely Lockhart is better than that. 4 teraflops is like...rx 470 performance? Little bit underwhelming. Unless they are going for a really low budget price point. That must be it. Microsoft are probably looking to really kill Sony on price to get market share back. Microsoft's plan here seems to be to lock Sony in so it doesn't have the best price console, but it also doesn't have the best performance console either. Interesting tactics.

 

Infact bcoz of consoles , gaming dev have to downgrade the graphics 

thts why what we see in e3 is totally different from what we play on our platforms (graphic wise)

Link to post
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, MeatFeastMan said:

I personally think the 12gb and 16gb vram is nonsense. I'm expecting 8gb vram to be honest. Why would Microsoft and Sony do that? Surely it makes more sense to let the console die after 5 or 6 years, and then be able to sell a new console. It wouldn't make sense from a financial standpoint for Microsoft and Sony to pack this thing with vram and let it last ages.

 

And surely Lockhart is better than that. 4 teraflops is like...rx 470 performance? Little bit underwhelming. Unless they are going for a really low budget price point. That must be it. Microsoft are probably looking to really kill Sony on price to get market share back. Microsoft's plan here seems to be to lock Sony in so it doesn't have the best price console, but it also doesn't have the best performance console either. Interesting tactics.

 

It's not, because that's shared memory. Meaning it'll be divided roughly in half, 8GB for system and 8GB for graphics. But it's actually unified memory (pay attention to GDDR6 name) so games can allocate it whatever way they want. Game can only use 1GB of memory and dedicate the rest of 15GB to graphics if they manage to make such game.

 

As for performance, it's irrelevant. Games on consoles are coded so far specifically for the specs you can pull amazing graphics out of RX580 grade GPU. Btw, latest Xbox One X or whatever it's named already uses unified memory like this with GDDR5. So, it's not really a new thing...

Link to post
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, MeatFeastMan said:

Microsoft's plan here seems to be to lock Sony in so it doesn't have the best price console, but it also doesn't have the best performance console either. Interesting tactics.

price really doesnt matter a whole lot when it comes to consoles, it is all about the exclusives and the plattform. 

 

M$ has a major advantage in that they can go full cross plattform without loosing anything. in fact they would gain a lot by turning their console into a psuedo PC

Link to post
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, GoldenLag said:

price really doesnt matter a whole lot when it comes to consoles, it is all about the exclusives and the plattform. 

 

M$ has a major advantage in that they can go full cross plattform without loosing anything. in fact they would gain a lot by turning their console into a psuedo PC

Thts why Sony always win through its strategy , by focusing on exclusive rather then specs 

and Microsoft focus mainly on specs like Xbox one x.

Link to post
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Ayush007 said:

Nothing man just telling the disadvantage of console and rumours regarding Xbox next gen 

except it was a plain false statement. 

 

they dont lower the graphics, they optimize it for the hardware......... which is an advantage, not a dissadvantage

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MeatFeastMan said:

I personally think the 12gb and 16gb vram is nonsense. I'm expecting 8gb vram to be honest. Why would Microsoft and Sony do that?

Past consoles have used GDDR exclusively for system memory and video memory so a large amount is required. PS4 was like that with 8GB GDDR5, but had 256MB DDR3 for background tasks, and Xbox One X was 12GB GDDR5. It's not a lot, it's what current consoles have now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

@Ayush007

You need to update your post to comply with the news section guidelines. Add a quote from the source as well as a link to the source and personal input/thoughts in the original post.

 

Quote
  • Your thread must include some original input to tell the reader why it is relevant to them, and what your personal opinion on the topic is. This needs to be MORE than just a quick, single comment to meet the posting guidelines.
  • Your thread must include a link to at least one reputable source. Most of the time, this should be a respected news site.
  • Your thread should also include quotes from the cited source(s). While you shouldn't just copy the entire article, your quote should give the reader a summary of the article in a way that gives the key details, but also leaves room for them to read the full article on the linked website. Please use quote tags to show that you have copied this content from another site.
  • The title of your thread must be relevant to the topic and should give a reader a good idea of the contents of the thread. Copying the title of the source is permitted but absolutely not required. It should be to the point and not be done in such a way as to mislead a reader, such as clickbait, etc.
  • If your article is about a product or some form of media, images are always appreciated, although they are not required.

https://linustechtips.com/main/topic/11724-posting-guidelines-read-before-posting/

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, MeatFeastMan said:

I personally think the 12gb and 16gb vram is nonsense

Unlike their desktop counterparts, Consoles tend to use GDDR or HBM in place of System and GPU memory. Keep in mind that these boxes tend to have custom AMD APU's in them. As in the CPU and GPU are on the same chip. That is why that amount of Vram is not nonsense. Because they need that much to do system and GPU tasks. 

I just want to sit back and watch the world burn. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, GoldenLag said:

price really doesnt matter a whole lot when it comes to consoles, it is all about the exclusives and the plattform. 

 

M$ has a major advantage in that they can go full cross plattform without loosing anything. in fact they would gain a lot by turning their console into a psuedo PC

 

38 minutes ago, GoldenLag said:

except it was a plain false statement. 

 

they dont lower the graphics, they optimize it for the hardware......... which is an advantage, not a dissadvantage

First of all thanks for taking interest in my section ,

secondly I agree 

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, valdyrgramr said:

Epic game store has games only on it, Steam has games only on it, Origin has games only on it, and PC has exclusives that aren't on any console.  Blood, Undying, Rune, Star Citizen, and many more are exclusive to PC.

Infact I agree what u say , just saw ur rig it’s awesome , ur PC should  give killer performance in gaming????

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 5/10/2019 at 10:32 AM, Ayush007 said:

imageproxy.php?img=&key=17c10421afdc6db8Here are some next gen info revealed by gamespot

Oh, interesting how they don't say Zen2 based 8 Core.

That is certain. Clockrate is not, that will be determinated a couple of weeks before release.

The GPU is unknown, certain is that it will be better than the Xbox One X.

 

Memory is not certain. Its over a Year until then. And I've seen conflicting information,. Someone even claimed 8GiB HBM (yeah, no, probably not) and 12 or 16GiB GDDR6.

And even if: Its easy to increase the Amount of Memory or decrease it, if the needed chips are available. So that's subject to change. Same with Memory Frequency.+

 

In General, we don't know shit about the Console. The only thing we KNOW is that the GPU will be NAVI based and an 8 Core Zen2 will be used.  That's it. Everything else is Speculatiion.

 

14 hours ago, quakeguy81 said:

And still not as powerful as a high-end PC...

And it never will be! (again).

If you followed the history of consoles, particularly the last gen, you'd know that they were pretty much a failure and didn't make much money, if at all.

In the Beginning they sold as shit because they were really expensive and nobody bought them.

And they failed. FOr the XBox 360 people assume a failure rate of at least 50%. And that M$ rumored to have lost 1 BIllion Dollars.

 

So no, they won't be high end ever again! They will stay at ~300-400€ for the entry level. Maybe there miht be a 500€ Top Model.

 

"Hell is full of good meanings, but Heaven is full of good works"

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 5/10/2019 at 12:36 PM, leadeater said:

Past consoles have used GDDR exclusively for system memory and video memory so a large amount is required. PS4 was like that with 8GB GDDR5, but had 256MB DDR3 for background tasks, and Xbox One X was 12GB GDDR5. It's not a lot, it's what current consoles have now.

PS4 has a kinda weird architecture.

They use an ARM Chip for I/O that accesses the APU memory and moves the stuff there.

Probably might also do some encryption.

 

The PS4 PRO has 1GiB DDR3 though...

ifixit.com/Teardown/PlayStation+4+Pro+Teardown/72946

And that's mostly for the Operating System and can not be accessed by the developer.

 

The really stupid thing though is that the APU can't be turned off the ARM SOC be used on its own for sleep mode downlaods (yes, PS4 has a rest mode but consumes 60W for my PRO).

 

On 5/10/2019 at 12:10 PM, Ayush007 said:

Thts why Sony always win through its strategy , by focusing on exclusive rather then specs 

and Microsoft focus mainly on specs like Xbox one x.

No, that's wrong.

At the end of last generation both consoles were even. The Problem was that M$ didn't innovate on the controller side much (only added trigger vibrators. SOny added a touch pad. Last gen already had Motion sensors) and some other technical aspects such as Bluetooth wich XBox One doesn't have or HDMI CEC.

 

But that's only a minor detail. The fact is that they totally botched the Launch of the XBoner with some stupid shit they made. For example the always on DRM, the privacy concerns due to kinect, the higher price and some other stuff I forgot.

That are all some serious kicks in the balls of the potential customers.

 

And THAT is what ruined the XBoner. As well as the weaker hardware, but personally I think that that isn't really the issue. Having weaker Hardware and beeing +100€ more is though (wich is also why I got a new PS4 PRO for 399€ instead of a new WiiU for 369€).

"Hell is full of good meanings, but Heaven is full of good works"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×