Jump to content

is this just anoying or can it cuase damamge?

ScubaSteve404
Go to solution Solved by bob345,

Its probably a bad or nearly dead florescent light ballast. Some brands make some horrendously annoying high pitch sounds when they are about to go. Not  harmful, just really annoying.

i recently decided to take a sample of the weird pitched tone in my high schools lunch room, chart will be attached below. the chart is roughly 37 seconds long and the frequency range is 0 Hz to 20 KHz and the noise is at roughly 17.5 KHz. one last thing, the tone seems to be there all day but idk for at night for hopefuly obvious reasons.

 

audio recorded with a samsung galaxy S9+ inside an otterbox phone case earlier today

Screenshot_20190408-150053_Spectrogram.thumb.jpg.d47e548b28d4825f3ed7532fda184ffd.jpg

 

edit: just realized i should add this context, the high frequency noise is yellow with some red and orange specs and the stuff at the bottum of the chart is green the rest is blue, light blue, or black

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its probably a bad or nearly dead florescent light ballast. Some brands make some horrendously annoying high pitch sounds when they are about to go. Not  harmful, just really annoying.

Case: Phanteks Evolve X with ITX mount  cpu: Ryzen 3900X 4.35ghz all cores Motherboard: MSI X570 Unify gpu: EVGA 1070 SC  psu: Phanteks revolt x 1200W Memory: 64GB Kingston Hyper X oc'd to 3600mhz ssd: Sabrent Rocket 4.0 1TB ITX System CPU: 4670k  Motherboard: some cheap asus h87 Ram: 16gb corsair vengeance 1600mhz

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am assuming it isn't that loud that you can't comfortably talk over it, in which case not harmful, just annoying.

 

Sounds become damaging when they reach a specific time/level threshold.  Usually rated in hours for a given dB (A weighted).  Or for a one off sound above 140dB (C weighted).

 

 

 

 

Grammar and spelling is not indicative of intelligence/knowledge.  Not having the same opinion does not always mean lack of understanding.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, mr moose said:

I am assuming it isn't that loud that you can't comfortably talk over it, in which case not harmful, just annoying.

 

Sounds become damaging when they reach a specific time/level threshold.  Usually rated in hours for a given dB (A weighted).  Or for a one off sound above 140dB (C weighted).

 

 

 

 

someone can easily talk over it but its defiantly there, the fact that band representing the noise is yellow with some red and orange and the easily ignoble background noise is green, blue, light blue, and has specs of black in it indicates it has some strength vs the back ground noise, and it's intensity varies across the whole room, its a pretty big indoor spaces with a small over hang mostly to add access to the 2nd floor and, as of right now, the main gym.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, ScubaSteve404 said:

someone can easily talk over it but its defiantly there, the fact that band representing the noise is yellow with some red and orange and the easily ignoble background noise is green, blue, light blue, and has specs of black in it indicates it has some strength vs the back ground noise, and it's intensity varies across the whole room, its a pretty big indoor spaces with a small over hang mostly to add access to the 2nd floor and, as of right now, the main gym.

The difference in color on that graph is nothing to be concerned about, the graph is just representing that it is slightly louder than the background noise level, which is as you describe because if it wasn't slightly louder then some people wouldn't notice it. 

 

The other thing to keep in mind is that the color change in those graphs is tied to many unknowns like the software itself, the accuracy of the mic on the phone, the exact postion it was recorded and the way the device was held.   In other words the colour yellow might represent different intensities depending the datum used by the Fourier software (i.e does it decide the color according to a recorded range or does it have a set color for recorded values? and does the software apply A or C weighting?)

Grammar and spelling is not indicative of intelligence/knowledge.  Not having the same opinion does not always mean lack of understanding.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, mr moose said:

The difference in color on that graph is nothing to be concerned about, the graph is just representing that it is slightly louder than the background noise level, which is as you describe because if it wasn't slightly louder then some people wouldn't notice it. 

 

The other thing to keep in mind is that the color change in those graphs is tied to many unknowns like the software itself, the accuracy of the mic on the phone, the exact postion it was recorded and the way the device was held.   In other words the colour yellow might represent different intensities depending the datum used by the Fourier software (i.e does it decide the color according to a recorded range or does it have a set color for recorded values? and does the software apply A or C weighting?)

it doesn't look like it gives any specifics like that, it seems like the app based intensity on how intence on thing is to a nethor or use one thing's intensity as a reference point for everything else

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, ScubaSteve404 said:

it doesn't look like it gives any specifics like that, it seems like the app based intensity on how intence on thing is to a nethor or use one thing's intensity as a reference point for everything else

Not many of them do,  Those sorts of apps are really only good for a quick reference.  

Grammar and spelling is not indicative of intelligence/knowledge.  Not having the same opinion does not always mean lack of understanding.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 4/9/2019 at 7:55 AM, mr moose said:

I am assuming it isn't that loud that you can't comfortably talk over it, in which case not harmful, just annoying.

 

Sounds become damaging when they reach a specific time/level threshold.  Usually rated in hours for a given dB (A weighted).  Or for a one off sound above 140dB (C weighted).

 

 

 

 

 

On 4/10/2019 at 3:02 AM, ScubaSteve404 said:

someone can easily talk over it but its defiantly there, the fact that band representing the noise is yellow with some red and orange and the easily ignoble background noise is green, blue, light blue, and has specs of black in it indicates it has some strength vs the back ground noise, and it's intensity varies across the whole room, its a pretty big indoor spaces with a small over hang mostly to add access to the 2nd floor and, as of right now, the main gym.

This is probably the best chart for hearing damage: http://dangerousdecibels.org/education/information-center/decibel-exposure-time-guidelines/

LTT's Resident Porsche fanboy and nutjob Audiophile.

 

Main speaker setup is now;

 

Mini DSP SHD Studio -> 2x Mola Mola Tambaqui DAC's (fed by AES/EBU, one feeds the left sub and main, the other feeds the right side) -> 2x Neumann KH420 + 2x Neumann KH870

 

(Having a totally seperate DAC for each channel is game changing for sound quality)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Derkoli said:

I tend to use the Australian occupation health and safety guidelines, they are pretty much the same all over the world and concise. 

Grammar and spelling is not indicative of intelligence/knowledge.  Not having the same opinion does not always mean lack of understanding.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, mr moose said:

I tend to use the Australian occupation health and safety guidelines, they are pretty much the same all over the world and concise. 

I just use the dangerous decibles one as it autofills into my browser lol. also pretty accurate, my subwoofers playing at just under 115Db start to hurt my ears about 40 secs later or so.

LTT's Resident Porsche fanboy and nutjob Audiophile.

 

Main speaker setup is now;

 

Mini DSP SHD Studio -> 2x Mola Mola Tambaqui DAC's (fed by AES/EBU, one feeds the left sub and main, the other feeds the right side) -> 2x Neumann KH420 + 2x Neumann KH870

 

(Having a totally seperate DAC for each channel is game changing for sound quality)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×