Jump to content

"Good enough" movie quality

Baterka

Hi, I realized that I dont need all my movies 4k or 1080p so I decided to convert them to h265 720p (or for some good movies to 1080p). I have so many Blurays and DVDs on my desk what I just want to throw because I have 8TB NAS.

 

What is "good enough" quality for 720p/1080p? What bitrate and sound quality I should use? I want to save some space but not go under some line where I will say "fuck that compression.

 

My PLEX app saying that best quality is equals to:

480p 1.5Mbps

720p - 4Mbps

1080p - 20Mbps

Its probably for h264 so I want to know what will be similar bitrate for h265.

 

I was always using original sound from DVD bluray to get the "best" but now I wonder if its needed too...

 

Website programmer & Electrician & PC HW lover!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Using handbrake, you can use "constant quality" instead of "constant bitrate". That solves your problem, just run it on a short video and see what settings meet your preferences.

CPU: i7-2600K 4751MHz 1.44V (software) --> 1.47V at the back of the socket Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 (BCLK: 103.3MHz) CPU Cooler: Noctua NH-D15 RAM: Adata XPG 2x8GB DDR3 (XMP: 2133MHz 10-11-11-30 CR2, custom: 2203MHz 10-11-10-26 CR1 tRFC:230 tREFI:14000) GPU: Asus GTX 1070 Dual (Super Jetstream vbios, +70(2025-2088MHz)/+400(8.8Gbps)) SSD: Samsung 840 Pro 256GB (main boot drive), Transcend SSD370 128GB PSU: Seasonic X-660 80+ Gold Case: Antec P110 Silent, 5 intakes 1 exhaust Monitor: AOC G2460PF 1080p 144Hz (150Hz max w/ DP, 121Hz max w/ HDMI) TN panel Keyboard: Logitech G610 Orion (Cherry MX Blue) with SteelSeries Apex M260 keycaps Mouse: BenQ Zowie FK1

 

Model: HP Omen 17 17-an110ca CPU: i7-8750H (0.125V core & cache, 50mV SA undervolt) GPU: GTX 1060 6GB Mobile (+80/+450, 1650MHz~1750MHz 0.78V~0.85V) RAM: 8+8GB DDR4-2400 18-17-17-39 2T Storage: HP EX920 1TB PCIe x4 M.2 SSD + Crucial MX500 1TB 2.5" SATA SSD, 128GB Toshiba PCIe x2 M.2 SSD (KBG30ZMV128G) gone cooking externally, 1TB Seagate 7200RPM 2.5" HDD (ST1000LM049-2GH172) left outside Monitor: 1080p 126Hz IPS G-sync

 

Desktop benching:

Cinebench R15 Single thread:168 Multi-thread: 833 

SuperPi (v1.5 from Techpowerup, PI value output) 16K: 0.100s 1M: 8.255s 32M: 7m 45.93s

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

h.265 depending on scene and resolution can have around 30% to 50% lower bitrates at the same quality but the encoding can take a LOT of time

 

You could also look at AV1 which gives the same quality on up to 60% lower bitrates but currently the encoding speed is extremely slow and it will take several times longer to encode than h.265. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, WereCat said:

h.265 depending on scene and resolution can have around 30% to 50% lower bitrates at the same quality but the encoding can take a LOT of time

 

You could also look at AV1 which gives the same quality on up to 60% lower bitrates but currently the encoding speed is extremely slow and it will take several times longer to encode than h.265. 

More than about encoding speed I care about bitrates what are somehow standardized or widely used. I need to know how much is "enough" to have good experience as a normal person and lower my space consumption

Website programmer & Electrician & PC HW lover!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

For DVD rips, Handbrakes default quality setting of 22 is already good. I haven't seen any difference between source quality and that. I did some testing with my own 720p recordings few years ago and found that 25 on that scale is lowest I could go before seeing quality loss.

^^^^ That's my post ^^^^
<-- This is me --- That's your scrollbar -->
vvvv Who's there? vvvv

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, LoGiCalDrm said:

For DVD rips, Handbrakes default quality setting of 22 is already good. I haven't seen any difference between source quality and that. I did some testing with my own 720p recordings few years ago and found that 25 on that scale is lowest I could go before seeing quality loss.

You speaking about h264 or h265

Website programmer & Electrician & PC HW lover!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Baterka said:

You speaking about h264 or h265

h264. I don't change things that much around.

^^^^ That's my post ^^^^
<-- This is me --- That's your scrollbar -->
vvvv Who's there? vvvv

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, LoGiCalDrm said:

h264. I don't change things that much around.

But who dont want 20-50% smaller files ?

Website programmer & Electrician & PC HW lover!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×