Jump to content

Vega delayed by slow and problematic production of HBM2?

tEMternette
Go to solution Solved by Mira Yurizaki,
9 minutes ago, tEMternet said:

Just curious to know but i've seen rumours circulating on message boards such as reddit that Vega's release has been delayed due to complications/problems with HBM2 production by SK Hynix, is there any validity to this?

 

Here is 1 source that backs up the reddit: http://wccftech.com/sk-hynix-lists-hbm2-gddr6-amds-vega-nvidias-volta-latest-memory-databook/

The major downside with HBM is you've now integrated a ton more things together and the entire package has to work. With regular memory, you can test the PCB first for connection issues, the memory chips by themselves, and if any one of those components has a problem, you can replace them. With HBM, it may be a one-shot deal. If the interposer or any of the HBM stacks fail, the entire package has to be thrown away.

Just curious to know but i've seen rumours circulating on message boards such as reddit that Vega's release has been delayed due to complications/problems with HBM2 production by SK Hynix, is there any validity to this?

 

Here is 1 source that backs up the reddit: http://wccftech.com/sk-hynix-lists-hbm2-gddr6-amds-vega-nvidias-volta-latest-memory-databook/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, tEMternet said:

Just curious to know but i've seen rumours circulating on message boards such as reddit that Vega's release has been delayed due to complications/problems with HBM2 production by SK Hynix, is there any validity to this?

 

Here is 1 source that backs up the reddit: http://wccftech.com/sk-hynix-lists-hbm2-gddr6-amds-vega-nvidias-volta-latest-memory-databook/

The major downside with HBM is you've now integrated a ton more things together and the entire package has to work. With regular memory, you can test the PCB first for connection issues, the memory chips by themselves, and if any one of those components has a problem, you can replace them. With HBM, it may be a one-shot deal. If the interposer or any of the HBM stacks fail, the entire package has to be thrown away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks!

So what your saying is Hynix are trying to get this right from the get go cos if it goes wrong it could be an expensive waste of an entire die which could be fatal for both AMD and Hynix who's main competator and development partener Samsung is working on HBM2 for volta!

 

PS: I dont hate Nvidia cards (i just hate some of Nvidia's practices) i just want vega to succed to stop market dominance and make the prices more reasonable for a student such as myself (i gotta play games and mine dogecoin somehow)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

HBM are stacked up memory chips. I think that caused cooling issues. I wonder if HBM equipped cards in the future will need thermal paste on both the core and HBM?

CPU: i7-2600K 4751MHz 1.44V (software) --> 1.47V at the back of the socket Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 (BCLK: 103.3MHz) CPU Cooler: Noctua NH-D15 RAM: Adata XPG 2x8GB DDR3 (XMP: 2133MHz 10-11-11-30 CR2, custom: 2203MHz 10-11-10-26 CR1 tRFC:230 tREFI:14000) GPU: Asus GTX 1070 Dual (Super Jetstream vbios, +70(2025-2088MHz)/+400(8.8Gbps)) SSD: Samsung 840 Pro 256GB (main boot drive), Transcend SSD370 128GB PSU: Seasonic X-660 80+ Gold Case: Antec P110 Silent, 5 intakes 1 exhaust Monitor: AOC G2460PF 1080p 144Hz (150Hz max w/ DP, 121Hz max w/ HDMI) TN panel Keyboard: Logitech G610 Orion (Cherry MX Blue) with SteelSeries Apex M260 keycaps Mouse: BenQ Zowie FK1

 

Model: HP Omen 17 17-an110ca CPU: i7-8750H (0.125V core & cache, 50mV SA undervolt) GPU: GTX 1060 6GB Mobile (+80/+450, 1650MHz~1750MHz 0.78V~0.85V) RAM: 8+8GB DDR4-2400 18-17-17-39 2T Storage: HP EX920 1TB PCIe x4 M.2 SSD + Crucial MX500 1TB 2.5" SATA SSD, 128GB Toshiba PCIe x2 M.2 SSD (KBG30ZMV128G) gone cooking externally, 1TB Seagate 7200RPM 2.5" HDD (ST1000LM049-2GH172) left outside Monitor: 1080p 126Hz IPS G-sync

 

Desktop benching:

Cinebench R15 Single thread:168 Multi-thread: 833 

SuperPi (v1.5 from Techpowerup, PI value output) 16K: 0.100s 1M: 8.255s 32M: 7m 45.93s

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×