980>1060?

[Kenji the Uke]

So, on EVGA's Bstock its possible to get a 980 for 278 bucks 3: Thats about how much the 1060 is.. Which would do more? Heat not a problem owo

[bughtoo]

I thik they are the same

1060 = 980

1070 = 980 ti 

1080 = titan X maxwell i guess 

performancewise

 

so you are better to get the newer 1060.

[Kenji the Uke]

Just now, bughtoo said:

I thik they are the same

1060 = 980

1070 = 980 ti 

1080 = titan X maxwell i guess 

So honestly, it would just be better in general to get the 1060 because new stuff features and energy efficiency? 3:

[Vasllo]

I think the 1060 is between the 970 and 980. Some OC would get it to the 980 level, but the 980 could also be OC'd so...

 

Pascal has a lot of new features that may be interesting for you. I would honestly go for the 1060, the main feature that brings my attention is Fast Sync. It's also efficient af.

[Kenji the Uke]

Just now, Mateus Campello said:

I think the 1060 is between the 970 and 980. Some OC would get it to the 980 level, but the 980 could also be OC'd so...

 

Pascal has a lot of new features that may be interesting for you. I would honestly go for the 1060, the main feature that brings my attention is Fast Sync. It's also efficient af.

Fast Sync?

[bughtoo]

3 minutes ago, Mateus Campello said:

I think the 1060 is between the 970 and 980. Some OC would get it to the 980 level, but the 980 could also be OC'd so...

 

Pascal has a lot of new features that may be interesting for you. I would honestly go for the 1060, the main feature that brings my attention is Fast Sync. It's also efficient af.

Well i think the 1060 is much better Overclocker than the 980 so i think you might get them on the same level even if the 980 is oced. 

 

[Vasllo]

5 minutes ago, Kenji the Uke said:

Fast Sync?

 

Research would get you better info, but here goes some of what I know:

VSync with triple buffer should get rid of VSync's delay, the biggest problem, but for n reasons, it doesn't. Fast Sync does it at driver level, decoupling the render pipeline and display pipeline to be able to choose which frames will be displayed and which will be thrown away. The GPU keeps rendering as many frames as it can, but not all of them are displayed, to keep frames been sent to the display at it's refresh rate to avoid tearing. Since there's no backpressure holding the GPU, you won't get as much delay and won't get tearing. If you don't have a GSync monitor, this may help, but I'm not sure about compatibility with games.

 

Well i think the 1060 is much better Overclocker than the 980 so i think you might get them on the same level even if the 980 is oced. 

 

 

I'm not sure about that, Pascal cards can get pretty impressive OC numbers, but considering the base clock is already high, the % difference isn't as big as it seems. A 160Mhz offset would be 10% or less. I think the 980 would keep the edge even when comparing OC, but may be a smaller advantage.

[masterkickass7]

18 minutes ago, Kenji the Uke said:

So, on EVGA's Bstock its possible to get a 980 for 278 bucks 3: Thats about how much the 1060 is.. Which would do more? Heat not a problem owo

Duh 1060

 

[bughtoo]

5 minutes ago, Mateus Campello said:

 

Research would get you better info, but here goes some of what I know:

VSync with triple buffer should get rid of VSync's delay, the biggest problem, but for n reasons, it doesn't. Fast Sync does it at driver level, decoupling the render pipeline and display pipeline to be able to choose which frames will be displayed and which will be thrown away. The GPU keeps rendering as many frames as it can, but not all of them are displayed, to keep frames been sent to the display at it's refresh rate to avoid tearing. Since there's no backpressure holding the GPU, you won't get as much delay and won't get tearing. If you don't have a GSync monitor, this may help, but I'm not sure about compatibility with games.

 

 

I'm not sure about that, Pascal cards can get pretty impressive OC numbers, but considering the base clock is already high, the % difference isn't as big as it seems. A 160Mhz offset would be 10% or less. I think the 980 would keep the edge even when comparing OC, but may be a smaller advantage.

Yeah that might be true. Still the difference is too small. 

 

 

21 minutes ago, Kenji the Uke said:

So, on EVGA's Bstock its possible to get a 980 for 278 bucks 3: Thats about how much the 1060 is.. Which would do more? Heat not a problem owo

OP TAKE THIS INTO CONSIDERATION

The biggest thing to take into consideration is future upgrade, with 1060 YOU CANT UPGRADE TO 2 GPU SLI LATER! 

[Vasllo]

1 minute ago, bughtoo said:

Yeah that might be true. Still the difference is too small. 

 

 

OP TAKE THIS INTO CONSIDERATION

The biggest thing to take into consideration is future upgrade, with 1060 YOU CANT UPGRADE TO 2 GPU SLI LATER! 

I would honestly not care about this. SLI is a mess rn and a pure lottery, you may get -10%, 0%, 20%, 50% or 70% more (or less) frames. Support is very poor, so I wouldn't spend double the money to sometimes/often have a card sitting on it's PCB doing nothing. I would sell it and get a better single GPU in the future.

[Rabih.H]

Why not get an RX 480? Save some money and get similar performance, and way better performance in DX12/Vulkan titles. :3

[bughtoo]

5 minutes ago, Rabih.H said:

Why not get an RX 480? Save some money and get similar performance, and way better performance in DX12/Vulkan titles. :3

not everytime but you still would have the upgradability, thats a nice suggestion.

[Kenji the Uke]

5 minutes ago, bughtoo said:

not everytime but you still would have the upgradability, thats a nice suggestion.

 

10 minutes ago, Rabih.H said:

Why not get an RX 480? Save some money and get similar performance, and way better performance in DX12/Vulkan titles. :3

 

54 minutes ago, bughtoo said:

Yeah that might be true. Still the difference is too small. 

 

 

OP TAKE THIS INTO CONSIDERATION

The biggest thing to take into consideration is future upgrade, with 1060 YOU CANT UPGRADE TO 2 GPU SLI LATER! 

Honestly though guys owo I was meaning just as a folding card.. I know thats alot for one job but.. I think it will even out if I were to donate the money :3 I'd rather know where that donation money goes. So SLI isnt that big of a problem.. 

 

As for the 480, maybe owo

[bughtoo]

4 minutes ago, Kenji the Uke said:

 

 

Honestly though guys owo I was meaning just as a folding card.. I know thats alot for one job but.. I think it will even out if I were to donate the money :3 I'd rather know where that donation money goes. So SLI isnt that big of a problem.. 

 

As for the 480, maybe owo

owo? what is owo?  you meants two?

[PRTI]

2 hours ago, bughtoo said:

I thik they are the same

1060 = 980

1070 = 980 ti 

1080 = titan X maxwell i guess 

performancewise

 

so you are better to get the newer 1060.

A GTX 1080 beats a maxwell Titan X,a GTX 1070 is on par with a Titan X which on par with a 980 Ti,a 980 beats a GTX 1060

[tobben]

Judging by what i can find it looks like the two

are somewhat comparable. Which has one

the edge over the other, if they will stay that

way with newer drivers or which one has the

best chances for a decent overclock i don't

know though.

 

980 might just have the edge over the 1060,

but again, overclocks and drivers, can't say 

for sure.

[bughtoo]

2 hours ago, keNNySOC said:

A GTX 1080 beats a maxwell Titan X,a GTX 1070 is on par with a Titan X which on par with a 980 Ti,a 980 beats a GTX 1060

overclocks and drivers will get the 1060 on par with 980, 1070 is on par with 980ti thats what i said, so with the 1060 and 980 and ok 1080 is better than titan x maxwell.

 

No need to say it like i am totaly wrong when i am only 1/3 wrong......

[PRTI]

2 minutes ago, bughtoo said:

overclocks and drivers will get the 1060 on par with 980, 1070 is on par with 980ti thats what i said, so with the 1060 and 980 and ok 1080 is better than titan x maxwell.

 

No need to say it like i am totaly wrong when i am only 1/3 wrong......

You said a GTX 1070 is on pair with a 980 ti,and a GTX 1080 is on pair with a Titan X,which is wrong

[bughtoo]

2 minutes ago, keNNySOC said:

You said a GTX 1070 is on pair with a 980 ti,and a GTX 1080 is on pair with a Titan X,which is wrong

"a GTX 1070 is on par with a Titan X which on par with a 980 Ti" your quote, am i stupid or saying that that A is on par with B which is on par with C is not the same as saying A is on par with C? .....

[PRTI]

Just now, bughtoo said:

"a GTX 1070 is on par with a Titan X which on par with a 980 Ti" your quote, am i stupid or saying that that A is on par with B which is on par with C is not the same as saying A is on par with C? .....

A GTX 1070 is a 980 Ti/Titan X Maxwell

 

But you said a GTX 1080 is on par with a GTX Titan X Maxwell which is wrong

[bughtoo]

2 minutes ago, keNNySOC said:

A GTX 1070 is a 980 Ti/Titan X Maxwell

 

But you said a GTX 1080 is on par with a GTX Titan X Maxwell which is wrong

yeah as i said i am only 1/3 wrong.... I admitted it. Man Read everything dont write something until you havent read the whole post.

[PRTI]

2 minutes ago, bughtoo said:

yeah as i said i am only 1/3 wrong.... I admitted it. Man Read everything dont write something until you havent read the whole post.

I did not say you were all wrong,i just said,you are wrong

[bughtoo]

1 minute ago, keNNySOC said:

I did not say you were all wrong,i just said,you are wrong

no comment. you clearly havent gotten my point, nwm

[PRTI]

1 minute ago, bughtoo said:

no comment. you clearly havent gotten my point, nwm

And what was your point,say it straight forward

[bughtoo]

already did...