Jump to content

SSDs for future games

Snowmnason

Sabrent had a pretty good sale for their NVMe's doing a speed up to 5000mps, I know there is worth in this for transferring large files and for workstation set ups.

But is there much worth in these speeds for gaming yet? I know engines are now going to pull data straight from the storage device in upcoming games, but wouldn't it make more sense to get something that could just do 3400mps at a cheaper cost or even as low as 500mps for even cheaper?

Edited by Snowmnason
Title, misunderstanding
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nobody knows about the future, but it's likely it will take years for direct storage to appear in games, and 3400MB/s is more than enough for any gaming you could dream of today. 

 

 

QUOTE/TAG ME WHEN REPLYING

Spend As Much Time Writing Your Question As You Want Me To Spend Responding To It.

If I'm wrong, please point it out. I'm always learning & I won't bite.

 

Desktop:

Delidded Core i7 4770K - GTX 1070 ROG Strix - 16GB DDR3 - Lots of RGB lights I never change

Laptop:

HP Spectre X360 - i7 8560U - MX150 - 2TB SSD - 16GB DDR4

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

For most all games, there is very little difference in load times between ssds. Even a slow sata ssd is not noticable from a optane(these are normally the fastest, as peak speeds don't really matter, and optane is much faster in most real world uses) drive in most uses.

 

Look at the ltt video here

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Electronics Wizardy said:

For most all games, there is very little difference in load times between ssds. Even a slow sata ssd is not noticable from a optane(these are normally the fastest, as peak speeds don't really matter, and optane is much faster in most real world uses) drive in most uses.

 

 

Oh no I am not talking about load times, hence me coming here, google is FILLED with ssds improving load times.

I am talking about future games. I am sorry my question become misleading when I mentioned the Hard drive thing

RTX IO: GPU Accelerated Storage Technology | NVIDIA

I have no idea how to describe the "new feature" but I am talking about this. I know PS5 is doing and Nivida talked about it too

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Snowmnason said:

Oh no I am not talking about load times, hence me coming here, google is FILLED with ssds improving load times.

I am talking about future games. I am sorry my question become misleading when I mentioned the Hard drive thing

RTX IO: GPU Accelerated Storage Technology | NVIDIA

I have no idea how to describe the "new feature" but I am talking about this. I know PS5 is doing and Nivida talked about it too

We really don't know. Its gonna be years before games start to use this if I had to make a guess, and probably a few more years before games start to require it.

 

I would't worry about this when setting up a pc now, as its probably gonna be so far out, you may need anouther ssd anyways.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Snowmnason said:

I have no idea how to describe the "new feature" but I am talking about this. I know PS5 is doing and Nivida talked about it too

The feature is called "Direct Storage", as @RadiatingLight mentioned above. The Nvidia implementation of this Microsoft API is called "RTX IO".

 

As others have said, until games actually use this feature (much less require it), it'll probably take some time, so you should be good with a "slower" SSD for the time being.

Remember to either quote or @mention others, so they are notified of your reply

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, Eigenvektor said:

The feature is called "Direct Storage"

As others have said, until games actually use this feature (much less require it), it'll probably take some time, so you should be good with a "slower" SSD for the time being.

Well either way I got one of them saved a little over 80 bucks on the 1tb! lol

Thank you though this information is really helpful!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×