Jump to content

Choosing the main router

Hi,

 

main question is: RouterOS or pfSense. Both solutions have their advances, but there's not much data about compering directly these two solutions. I've worked for 6 years with Mikrotik devices and about two ears with pfSense. Now it's time for an upgrade so... Any opinions :)?

OBR CTM S.A.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have always worked with pfSense and I really like it, never had any issues.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd go with pfSense, simply because it's used by so many people, so troubleshooting etc. will be a lot simpler

75% of what I say is sarcastic

 

So is the rest probably

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its my understanding that FreeBSD that pfSense is built on is generally considered to have a faster networking stack, especially when it comes to things like packet filtering.

 

I certainly found going from OpenWRT to pfSense that everything felt more responsive.

Router:  Intel N100 (pfSense) WiFi6: Zyxel NWA210AX (1.7Gbit peak at 160Mhz)
WiFi5: Ubiquiti NanoHD OpenWRT (~500Mbit at 80Mhz) Switches: Netgear MS510TXUP, MS510TXPP, GS110EMX
ISPs: Zen Full Fibre 900 (~930Mbit down, 115Mbit up) + Three 5G (~800Mbit down, 115Mbit up)
Upgrading Laptop/Desktop CNVIo WiFi 5 cards to PCIe WiFi6e/7

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mikrotik hAP ac2

There is no reason to go pfsense with the amount of configuration you'll lose.

 

Also for $70 you will not build anything close enough on custom hardware for pfsense

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×