Efilnikufesin

According to who? Don't remember anything like this being mentioned at all. Competitive is all I heard stated. This f***ing forum is worse than the sites they lambast for outrageous claims.

Bioware is dead. According to EA standards, and according to the the standards of those who bought their games for many years.
 
Was very disappointed myself when they went under the EA flag, yet not surprised that things are heading in the direction they are.
 
RIP Bioware. TY for KOTOR and DA, some of my favorite games.
 
Edit: How could I forget? The first Mass Effect as well. RIP

Did you stress test it?

I doubt that, it is not disclosed why it was dropped and if it was initiated to begin with it was done by their legal department which felt they had a case. I would guess there was a non disclosed settlement involved.

Let's face it, FB is simply a place to get viruses from friends and have your personal data stolen. Spend too much time making money off viruses ppl get from FB or their affiliations with it.

You'll be fine.  Unless you're running crossfire.

Read up on snowboard tech, it is far from stagnant. Geometry is a wonderful thing. flat base, cambered, reverse camber, variable radius sidecuts, and more. Snowboard tech even brought the ski industry back from the dead with new designs that applied to them as well.

Well, to be honest. Nothing on any official basis that anyone can take with a grain of salt has been tested at all. We will still see.  Too much talking in absolutes without any verifiable data. BIOS updates, driver updates, all these things will happen. There will be bugs, are there ever not?  Why are so many people talking in such absolutes when we really haven't seen a damn thing worth mentioning yet?
 

I agree with this, which is why I've refrained from speaking in absolutes about things we've yet to see. My IPC estimates are simply that: estimates. I have always assumed Haswell IPC, and Haswell is within 5-8% of Skylake, so my "within 5-10%" number came from my original guess. As for the LN2 overclocking results, we've seen them, they are real, but even they are not indicative of Ryzen's real overclocking potential. It's just a "pseudo-ceiling" for that specific chip that may or may not even be a retail chip, on an unrefined BIOS. 

Well, to be honest. Nothing on any official basis that anyone can take with a grain of salt has been tested at all. We will still see.  Too much talking in absolutes without any verifiable data. BIOS updates, driver updates, all these things will happen. There will be bugs, are there ever not?  Why are so many people talking in such absolutes when we really haven't seen a damn thing worth mentioning yet?
 

Suspicious video is suspicious. Plus those look a great deal like 8350 numbers on that benchmark. I Will see on Mar 2nd when I have a 1700 in my hands. I took the plunge, my system is really showing its age.

Suspicious video is suspicious. Plus those look a great deal like 8350 numbers on that benchmark. I Will see on Mar 2nd when I have a 1700 in my hands. I took the plunge, my system is really showing its age.