Jump to content

EminentSun

Member
  • Posts

    647
  • Joined

Reputation Activity

  1. Agree
    EminentSun got a reaction from rkv_2401 in "2K" does not mean 2560×1440   
    The whole 4k thing is kind of ridiculous. We should just be calling it 2160p, but nooooooo. Some marketing team decided to introduce a ridiculous moniker.
  2. Agree
    EminentSun got a reaction from Igni5 in "2K" does not mean 2560×1440   
    The whole 4k thing is kind of ridiculous. We should just be calling it 2160p, but nooooooo. Some marketing team decided to introduce a ridiculous moniker.
  3. Agree
    EminentSun got a reaction from IPD in "2K" does not mean 2560×1440   
    The whole 4k thing is kind of ridiculous. We should just be calling it 2160p, but nooooooo. Some marketing team decided to introduce a ridiculous moniker.
  4. Agree
    EminentSun got a reaction from Letgomyleghoe in "2K" does not mean 2560×1440   
    The whole 4k thing is kind of ridiculous. We should just be calling it 2160p, but nooooooo. Some marketing team decided to introduce a ridiculous moniker.
  5. Agree
    EminentSun got a reaction from Fnige in "2K" does not mean 2560×1440   
    The whole 4k thing is kind of ridiculous. We should just be calling it 2160p, but nooooooo. Some marketing team decided to introduce a ridiculous moniker.
  6. Agree
    EminentSun got a reaction from sazrocks in "2K" does not mean 2560×1440   
    The whole 4k thing is kind of ridiculous. We should just be calling it 2160p, but nooooooo. Some marketing team decided to introduce a ridiculous moniker.
  7. Agree
    EminentSun got a reaction from I-r0k in "2K" does not mean 2560×1440   
    The whole 4k thing is kind of ridiculous. We should just be calling it 2160p, but nooooooo. Some marketing team decided to introduce a ridiculous moniker.
  8. Like
    EminentSun got a reaction from kirashi in "2K" does not mean 2560×1440   
    The whole 4k thing is kind of ridiculous. We should just be calling it 2160p, but nooooooo. Some marketing team decided to introduce a ridiculous moniker.
  9. Agree
    EminentSun got a reaction from SwediBOY in "2K" does not mean 2560×1440   
    The whole 4k thing is kind of ridiculous. We should just be calling it 2160p, but nooooooo. Some marketing team decided to introduce a ridiculous moniker.
  10. Agree
    EminentSun got a reaction from happyhungarian in "2K" does not mean 2560×1440   
    The whole 4k thing is kind of ridiculous. We should just be calling it 2160p, but nooooooo. Some marketing team decided to introduce a ridiculous moniker.
  11. Agree
    EminentSun got a reaction from MikeCgamez in "2K" does not mean 2560×1440   
    The whole 4k thing is kind of ridiculous. We should just be calling it 2160p, but nooooooo. Some marketing team decided to introduce a ridiculous moniker.
  12. Agree
    EminentSun got a reaction from koolerone in "2K" does not mean 2560×1440   
    The whole 4k thing is kind of ridiculous. We should just be calling it 2160p, but nooooooo. Some marketing team decided to introduce a ridiculous moniker.
  13. Agree
    EminentSun got a reaction from sotiris.bos in "2K" does not mean 2560×1440   
    The whole 4k thing is kind of ridiculous. We should just be calling it 2160p, but nooooooo. Some marketing team decided to introduce a ridiculous moniker.
  14. Agree
    EminentSun got a reaction from nO_d3N1AL in "2K" does not mean 2560×1440   
    The whole 4k thing is kind of ridiculous. We should just be calling it 2160p, but nooooooo. Some marketing team decided to introduce a ridiculous moniker.
  15. Funny
    EminentSun reacted to suicidalfranco in Vega efficient at mining?   
    Hollywood?
    But their not gamers! Manufacturers should remove warranty to all cards used in render farms and AMD should release drivers that disable computing when they detect that a video is being rendered
     
  16. Funny
    EminentSun reacted to Syfes in Google removes visible watermark with ease, a warning to content creators   
    Whoa stop right there! You are making way too much sense for this forum.
     
    ? -> obligatory poop emoji to bring the conversation back down to acceptable level
  17. Like
    EminentSun got a reaction from Hugsy Malone in "2K" does not mean 2560×1440   
    The whole 4k thing is kind of ridiculous. We should just be calling it 2160p, but nooooooo. Some marketing team decided to introduce a ridiculous moniker.
  18. Agree
    EminentSun got a reaction from gbergeron in "2K" does not mean 2560×1440   
    The whole 4k thing is kind of ridiculous. We should just be calling it 2160p, but nooooooo. Some marketing team decided to introduce a ridiculous moniker.
  19. Funny
    EminentSun reacted to SCHISCHKA in Police of Berlin is inquiring the cell phone data of all Berliners every 11 days   
    It will only drive up the cost of weed as every dealer will need a new phone every 11 days
  20. Agree
    EminentSun got a reaction from Captain_Chicken in "2K" does not mean 2560×1440   
    The whole 4k thing is kind of ridiculous. We should just be calling it 2160p, but nooooooo. Some marketing team decided to introduce a ridiculous moniker.
  21. Agree
    EminentSun reacted to samcool55 in Ajit Pai doesn't want to release the FCC NN complaints   
    US citizens, it was nice knowing you! Hopefully we'll see you again soon once NN returns...
     
    Honestly this is so bad i would move to another country... This could effect lives of many people on a daily basis in such a bad way i won't be surprised if people would just leave the sh*thole...
  22. Agree
    EminentSun got a reaction from LucaMH in "2K" does not mean 2560×1440   
    The whole 4k thing is kind of ridiculous. We should just be calling it 2160p, but nooooooo. Some marketing team decided to introduce a ridiculous moniker.
  23. Agree
    EminentSun got a reaction from YourDarlingNoor in "2K" does not mean 2560×1440   
    The whole 4k thing is kind of ridiculous. We should just be calling it 2160p, but nooooooo. Some marketing team decided to introduce a ridiculous moniker.
  24. Agree
    EminentSun reacted to SpaceGhostC2C in Windows 10 source code leaked?!   
    What? Having a disclosed source code "poses a threat to user security" due to "intricate resources" to what?
     
    Do you realize Linux is entirely open source, meaning the source code is and has always been publicly available, right?
     
    Leaked source code harms Microsoft's intelectual property. It has nothing to do with users' security.
  25. Informative
    EminentSun reacted to You_are_a_cunt in AMD Epyc 7000 series revealed   
    They're gonna pull a 34c/68t CPU out of their asses, duh.
×