done12many2

I don't think that has a svideo plug, if that is what you are referring to.
This is how svideo looks like.

Locked.
 
we already have a thread for that ;
https://linustechtips.com/main/topic/101587-ultimate-dream-build-for-free-hypothetical/
 

I gotta say, that is one very impressive chip. I didn't have enough thermal paste on hand to swap out my chip to my non-delidded sample, so I had to use my delidded 8700k with hyperthreading disabled, clocked at 5ghz core, 4.1 cache, 2666 C16-18-18-35-2 and 1.2v on my EVGA CLC 280, but this was my result: 

 
I absolutely cannot wait to see what yours looks like after delidding.

Then just run it as it.  If you want to see how it performs in its normal capacity, test it in its normal capacity. 
 
Have fun and good luck.

I'm the type of benchmarker which is purely to see how my system runs, so I suppose running as is makes much more sense than what I do currently.

close the thread and go outside kek

yeah wait a couple weeks and use your computer normaly before you trow a party about this
 

yea to many variables, but i did some reasonable testing which havnt let me down ever since. I mean it depends on how complex you are overclocking, if you include RAM and cache overclocking to the max. then it might not be enough, but for vcore evaluation without any huge extra's it seems to work very well.
 
Yea it makes sense what you said, never was in doubt. 
Yea im trying to improve my overclocks to be more "rounded" but if you never really did RAM OC its really a pain, and there isnt any guide or poeple to help you, you just have to go through the fiddling with try and error i guess. I have no idea, its really hard to see that some poeple that bought the same Kit are just using Raja's Apex 3700cl17 profile settings bump it to 4133 and add a little voltage, unfortunately i cant, doesnt boot at all. I havent upped cache considerably because i wanted to get my RAMOC better first, but i dont really know what im doing there  

Aye...and we haven't seen yours either?

I personally would never assume that because an overclock can do one small range for over an hour, that it will automatically pass 23 hours as I know first hand that's not true.
 
With that said, you are still testing stability a great deal harder than most people do and I applaud you for that.  
 
 
As I'm sure you're aware, if you are testing with Prime95 small FFTs, you aren't stressing memory or IMC.  More data across the RAM keeps CPU cycles fed more often, which increases load.  This would be where you'd want to run large FFTs or a long-term 23hr blend test before climbing too high up on your horse about Vcore.  
 
Either way, I'm not questioning your overclock in the least bit nor did I at anytime do so.  I'm sure it's every bit as stable as you need it to be and that is all that matters.
 
If you'll go back through what I said, comparing it to another's overclock is pointless for very obvious reasons.  There are just too many variables from system to system and environment to environment to make any sense out of comparing a known clock to a known voltage. 
 
Showing outputted work though, that's a bit different.  If people want to demonstrate how fast their CPU can accomplish a task, that's quantifiable.  I can guarantee that the guy with a better tweaked overclock despite having a lower clockspeed, will generally beat out the guy with a higher clockspeed, but using stock cache and weak memory settings (generally speaking).
 
 
It will not make that much of a difference in life expectancy.  At least not enough to justify more cooling unless you need more thermal overhead for other things.
 
If you are operating safely while testing with Prime, it is safe to assume that you'll be perfectly fine in any other daily scenario that your CPU will face. 
 
Good luck man.
 

Just arrived. My sample serial number ends in 666. Tonight I will bench in hell!

I would be very interested to see what Brian Krzanich actually said. 

Haha, they finally managed to make Witcher 3 and GTAV working
 
Here is a chart from the same site but from March last year:
 
https://babeltechreviews.com/gtx-1080-ti-sli-performance-25-games/3/
 
When I first saw their numbers I was wtf, I know for a fact that those games have better scaling.
 

Pretty much hit the nail on the head.  Lack of first-hand experience drives the repeated ignorant posts.  

Yes as long as the card is the same basic model you can SLI them. 
 
Don't listen to all the misinformed people on this forum who keep parroting each other about SLI not being supported, being bad etc. 
 
The fact is that about 70% of current titles have at least a decent performance boost from SLI compared to a single card, and only a handful of games either don't work or see a performance hit. 
 
My guess is most of these people either just keep repeating each other and have no idea, or can't afford two video cards so they're just latching on to the heresay that it isnt good / doesn't work / isn't worth it 

@done12many2 Oh man, I think I will bow out here. Tried everything and I think that the silicon lottery isn't just with me. Managed to get all cores to 4.5GHz stable, it wouldn't budge with 4.6. Same with single core boost, when I couldn't get it to 4.9 and 4.8 I decided it's just not gonna work (getting less wouldn't make substantial difference anyway).
 
Main problem are the GPU's: can't get them stable higher than those 2075Mhz without flashing custom bios to play with voltage (which I'm not sure I want to do).
 
You're the king. 
 
That being said, here are my new scores so that when you cross the finish line you will at least have me in the corner of your eye
 
1080p
CPU: i7 6950X 4.5 Ghz
GPUs: 2x1080ti 2075Mhz 6005 Mhz Memory (1501Mhz)
Score: 7775
FPS: 185.8
 

 
1440p
CPU: i7 6950X 4.5 Ghz
GPUs: 2x1080ti 2075Mhz 6005 Mhz Memory (1501Mhz)
Score: 7396
FPS: 176.8
 

 
4k
CPU: i7 6950X 4.5 Ghz
GPUs: 2x1080ti 2075Mhz 6005 Mhz Memory (1501Mhz)
Score: 4054
FPS: 96.9
 

 
That improved my average score by about 3 fps to about 153.17 vs. yours 162.17 - hey, at least it's less than 10 and I made it a bit harder to take 2nd place from me 

At this point judging by his core and memory clocks it doesn't really matter, he will take that back too unless I find a way to stabilise my GPUs at higher OC

@done12many2 5.1 on that 7900X is pretty stout... Good to see that mining hasn't had any effect on all those chips too
 
Could always go for his Superposition score too. He's still #1 with 2 cards there. 

Thanks for forcing me to blow the dust out of this rig!  It hasn't run 3d in a half year.  A few taps with a hammer and the GPUs stopped resisting.  
 
 
@Masada02 My man!  Submission for the Leaderboard at your convenience.   Thanks.
 
 
1080p Extreme HD:
CPU: i7 7900X 5.1 GHz
GPUs: 2x 1080 Ti @ 2113 MHz Core / 6105 MHz Memory
Score: 8307
FPS: 198.5
 

 
 
1440p:
CPU: i7 7900X 5.1 GHz
GPUs: 2x 1080 Ti @ 2113 MHz Core / 6105 MHz Memory
Score: 7764
FPS: 185.6
 

 
 
4k:
CPU: i7 7900X 5.1 GHz
GPUs: 2x 1080 Ti @ 2113 MHz Core / 6105 MHz Memory
Score: 4286
FPS: 102.4
 

 
 
3440 x 1440:
CPU: i7 7900X 5.1 GHz
GPUs: 2x 1080 Ti @ 2113 MHz Core / 6105 MHz Memory
Score: 6455
FPS: 154.3
 

Thanks for forcing me to blow the dust out of this rig!  It hasn't run 3d in a half year.  A few taps with a hammer and the GPUs stopped resisting.  
 
 
@Masada02 My man!  Submission for the Leaderboard at your convenience.   Thanks.
 
 
1080p Extreme HD:
CPU: i7 7900X 5.1 GHz
GPUs: 2x 1080 Ti @ 2113 MHz Core / 6105 MHz Memory
Score: 8307
FPS: 198.5
 

 
 
1440p:
CPU: i7 7900X 5.1 GHz
GPUs: 2x 1080 Ti @ 2113 MHz Core / 6105 MHz Memory
Score: 7764
FPS: 185.6
 

 
 
4k:
CPU: i7 7900X 5.1 GHz
GPUs: 2x 1080 Ti @ 2113 MHz Core / 6105 MHz Memory
Score: 4286
FPS: 102.4
 

 
 
3440 x 1440:
CPU: i7 7900X 5.1 GHz
GPUs: 2x 1080 Ti @ 2113 MHz Core / 6105 MHz Memory
Score: 6455
FPS: 154.3
 

Take your time
 
@done12many2 Congrats man. I will always have those few days, though I'm not throwing the towel just yet ;-)

Thanks for forcing me to blow the dust out of this rig!  It hasn't run 3d in a half year.  A few taps with a hammer and the GPUs stopped resisting.  
 
 
@Masada02 My man!  Submission for the Leaderboard at your convenience.   Thanks.
 
 
1080p Extreme HD:
CPU: i7 7900X 5.1 GHz
GPUs: 2x 1080 Ti @ 2113 MHz Core / 6105 MHz Memory
Score: 8307
FPS: 198.5
 

 
 
1440p:
CPU: i7 7900X 5.1 GHz
GPUs: 2x 1080 Ti @ 2113 MHz Core / 6105 MHz Memory
Score: 7764
FPS: 185.6
 

 
 
4k:
CPU: i7 7900X 5.1 GHz
GPUs: 2x 1080 Ti @ 2113 MHz Core / 6105 MHz Memory
Score: 4286
FPS: 102.4
 

 
 
3440 x 1440:
CPU: i7 7900X 5.1 GHz
GPUs: 2x 1080 Ti @ 2113 MHz Core / 6105 MHz Memory
Score: 6455
FPS: 154.3
 

I don't know about that "no problem" stuff as you've laid down some nice numbers.  
 
Unfortunately, the 1080p test has become nothing more than a CPU test.  With 1080s and 1080Tis at 1080p, draw calls are just too much for the CPU and the only way to increase scores is to push CPU clock speeds to very high levels (5GHz and higher with decent IPC).
 
I'm not sure what you've tried so far for CPU clock speed, but there are a few tricks that can help.  A "per core" OC or a "per usage"  OC will allow you to clock individual cores higher than the rest without thermally saturating the chip.  You could also disable cores and achieve slightly higher clocks with the remaining active cores thanks to lower temps (Valley only needs 1 core).  At the end of the day, it's still more fun to reach whatever score you get with all cores active so a "per core" or "per usage" OC would probably be better. 
 
1080p is a waste of time for a rig as powerful as yours.

Hey bud.  Congrats on the scores and challenge excepted.  My x299 rig has been mining since the beginning of the year so I'm going to need to blow the rads out before I even think about it.  They look like they're coated in a whitish wool blanket at the moment.  Either way, you've raised the bar and I like your style. 

Thanks, means a lot coming from you since I recognize your expertise regarding HEDT platforms ;-) I suspect you will have no problem beating those scores unless I find a way to unbottleneck myself from 1080p extreme