Jump to content

Question about Ryzen 2700X vs Intel 8700K

Hi, in the following video:

after 4:49 in his benchmarks of the GPUs, both systems with Ryzen 2700x and Intel i7 8700K performed almost the same. Everywhere else on the Internet (in game benchmarks), Ryzen 2700X performs around 15-20% worse in games than the i7 8700K. How does Ryzen match up to Intel here?

 

I'm genuinely interested because I want to build a new gaming PC in the next 2 months (until I have everything I need for the price I want) and I'm undecided on AMD or Intel. AMD because of the possibility of an easy and less costly upgrade to 7nm Ryzen 3000 series. Also, I don't want to wait for another year for the new CPUs, my current build is from 2011 with a GTX580...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, LEXXIUS said:

.

it's 4k, the difference doesn't kick in until like 80 fps in some games, 100 in others.If you look at the CSGO min frame rates, the difference is still there when the fps gets high enough.

 

Also some tests were showing bottlenecks from the 8700k, let alone the 2700x to the 2080 ti in even 1440p, so unless you have a 4k monitor, keep that in mind.

5950x 1.33v 5.05 4.5 88C 195w ll R20 12k ll drp4 ll x570 dark hero ll gskill 4x8gb 3666 14-14-14-32-320-24-2T (zen trfc)  1.45v 45C 1.15v soc ll 6950xt gaming x trio 325w 60C ll samsung 970 500gb nvme os ll sandisk 4tb ssd ll 6x nf12/14 ippc fans ll tt gt10 case ll evga g2 1300w ll w10 pro ll 34GN850B ll AW3423DW

 

9900k 1.36v 5.1avx 4.9ring 85C 195w (daily) 1.02v 4.3ghz 80w 50C R20 temps score=5500 ll D15 ll Z390 taichi ult 1.60 bios ll gskill 4x8gb 14-14-14-30-280-20 ddr3666bdie 1.45v 45C 1.22sa/1.18 io  ll EVGA 30 non90 tie ftw3 1920//10000 0.85v 300w 71C ll  6x nf14 ippc 2000rpm ll 500gb nvme 970 evo ll l sandisk 4tb sata ssd +4tb exssd backup ll 2x 500gb samsung 970 evo raid 0 llCorsair graphite 780T ll EVGA P2 1200w ll w10p ll NEC PA241w ll pa32ucg-k

 

prebuilt 5800 stock ll 2x8gb ddr4 cl17 3466 ll oem 3080 0.85v 1890//10000 290w 74C ll 27gl850b ll pa272w ll w11

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you all for the clarification. I want to get an ultrawide 3440x1440 120Hz monitor. Based on benchmarks I could find now both processors had little difference on 2560x1440=3,6megapixels, which should be even smaller on 3440x1440=~5Mp or 4K = 8.3Mp. I think Ryzen would be the better choice, especially because of the easy upgradeability to Ryzen 3000x 7nm later on.

 

What do you think about Ryzen with that resolution + 120Hz?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, LEXXIUS said:

Thank you all for the clarification. I want to get an ultrawide 3440x1440 120Hz monitor. Based on benchmarks I could find now both processors had little difference on 2560x1440=3,6megapixels, which should be even smaller on 3440x1440=~5Mp or 4K = 8.3Mp. I think Ryzen would be the better choice, especially because of the easy upgradeability to Ryzen 3000x 7nm later on.

 

What do you think about Ryzen with that resolution + 120Hz?

If your goal is high refresh then there will be a noticeable difference between the Ryzen and Intel parts. It just comes down to whether or not you think the extra performance is worth the $$$.

CPU - Ryzen Threadripper 2950X | Motherboard - X399 GAMING PRO CARBON AC | RAM - G.Skill Trident Z RGB 4x8GB DDR4-3200 14-13-13-21 | GPU - Aorus GTX 1080 Ti Waterforce WB Xtreme Edition | Case - Inwin 909 (Silver) | Storage - Samsung 950 Pro 500GB, Samsung 970 Evo 500GB, Samsung 840 Evo 500GB, HGST DeskStar 6TB, WD Black 2TB | PSU - Corsair AX1600i | Display - DELL ULTRASHARP U3415W |

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×