CANT OVERCLOCK PAST 4.6MHZ????

[Gojon17]

i set cpu ratio to 46, boots and starts fine, tried stability test and went great, temps between 56-63 C, No trottle, volt set at 1.330.

as soon as i switch the cpu ratio to 47 pc will boot into a blue screen with the sad face saying that it must restart, tried many times.

whats the problem?

msi z170 gaming m5

intel i7 6700k

gtx 980ti

16gb ddr4 ram

[Space Reptile]

going past 4.6 megahertz shud be easy , 4.6ghz is a different story and not really recommended if it takes way more power than 4.5 or 4.4 ghz and runs hotter as the performance gain is minimal 

[Guest]

What voltage are you using?

[Gojon17]

2 minutes ago, Space Reptile said:

going past 4.6 megahertz shud be easy , 4.6ghz is a different story and not really recommended if it takes way more power than 4.5 or 4.4 ghz and runs hotter as the performance gain is minimal 

im sorry... meant ghz lol

[Jurrunio]

more volts to 1.35 then.

[Gojon17]

Just now, FibonacciOne1235 said:

What voltage are you using?

1.330

[Gojon17]

Just now, Jurrunio said:

more volts to 1.35 then.

i tried that too, since my cpu was running so damn cold i tried 1,350 and still it did that

[Guest]

Try something like 1.35

[Guest]

1 minute ago, Gojon17 said:

i tried that too, since my cpu was running so damn cold i tried 1,350 and still it did that

How high have you gone?

[Gojon17]

2 minutes ago, FibonacciOne1235 said:

How high have you gone?

4.6 ghz

temps never went above 63 C

1.330 V

[Gojon17]

3 minutes ago, FibonacciOne1235 said:

How high have you gone?

if you meant volts then 1.350 and wont boot on 4.7 ghz

[Valkyrie Lenneth]

i used to have a chip that couldnt go past 4.5 no matter what, even at 1.5v ( coz i was raging mad ) it was coz 1 shitty core wouldnt go higher even 10mhz ;v

[Gojon17]

4 minutes ago, Valkyrie Lenneth said:

i used to have a chip that couldnt go past 4.5 no matter what, even at 1.5v ( coz i was raging mad ) it was coz 1 shitty core wouldnt go higher even 10mhz ;v

did you have a similar experience??? booting into a blue screen saying it needs a restart?

[Valkyrie Lenneth]

2 minutes ago, Gojon17 said:

did you have a similar experience??? booting into a blue screen saying it needs a restart?

yeah depending on how high i clocked it, that 1 damned core just wouldnt go up

 

if its core 1 u usually crash rly quick  or 2

[Gojon17]

1 minute ago, Valkyrie Lenneth said:

yeah depending on how high i clocked it, that 1 damned core just wouldnt go up

well that sucks... hope mine isnt that way, it runs so cool and nice at 4.6ghz. idles at 24 and aida 64 full load at 63 and most of the time of the stress test it stays around 59.

[Valkyrie Lenneth]

Just now, Gojon17 said:

well that sucks... hope mine isnt that way, it runs so cool and nice at 4.6ghz. idles at 24 and aida 64 full load at 63 and most of the time of the stress test it stays around 59.

try running at 4.6ghz with just first 2 cores, if it crashes it might be core 1 or 2

same for core 3-4   find out which core is screwing u over

[NTDaws]

why you running at 4.6MHz

[Gojon17]

4 minutes ago, Being Delirious said:

why you running at 4.6MHz

well... most guys running stock have worse temps than my overclocked 6700k. so if shes happy and cool why not???

[bcguru9384]

59 minutes ago, Gojon17 said:

i set cpu ratio to 46, boots and starts fine, tried stability test and went great, temps between 56-63 C, No trottle, volt set at 1.330.

as soon as i switch the cpu ratio to 47 pc will boot into a blue screen with the sad face saying that it must restart, tried many times.

whats the problem?

msi z170 gaming m5

intel i7 6700k

gtx 980ti

16gb ddr4 ram

OVP OCP

over volt protection

over current protection 

when you change the OVP you didnot adjust y=mx±b step of the OCP 

((volts(amps))=watts)=min to max range when volts has OVP UVP

uvp under volt protection

this is programable interface controller or PIC(8 16 32 64 bit)

very likely with 47 chosen your pch controller now boosted to voltage not allowed

baseclock×multiplyer get cpu ghz

dont remember which but pch gets its clock by reusing either baseclock or multiplyer

why its not really recommended (yet glory of the ignorent to think they can change this number and it only effect that specific part of pc)

about.com in 2006 had great detailed article that covered the whole pc clock structure

why my ada3000 athlon64 went from 200base with 10x multi to 212 with 10x (2ghz to 2.12ghz) as any higher pushed ram to be pissy(math provable with memtest confirming)

i used 5 damn notebook pages and felt like i was doing damn geometry proof

[Gojon17]

1 hour ago, bcguru9384 said:

OVP OCP

over volt protection

over current protection 

when you change the OVP you didnot adjust y=mx±b step of the OCP 

((volts(amps))=watts)=min to max range when volts has OVP UVP

uvp under volt protection

this is programable interface controller or PIC(8 16 32 64 bit)

very likely with 47 chosen your pch controller now boosted to voltage not allowed

baseclock×multiplyer get cpu ghz

dont remember which but pch gets its clock by reusing either baseclock or multiplyer

why its not really recommended (yet glory of the ignorent to think they can change this number and it only effect that specific part of pc)

about.com in 2006 had great detailed article that covered the whole pc clock structure

why my ada3000 athlon64 went from 200base with 10x multi to 212 with 10x (2ghz to 2.12ghz) as any higher pushed ram to be pissy(math provable with memtest confirming)

i used 5 damn notebook pages and felt like i was doing damn geometry proof

So what you are saying is to change settings to allow more current?

 

[Gojon17]

I think I got it. Changed gt something from Auto to Override. Then up the voltage to 1.360. then it booted no problem. Right now into 10 min of stress testing. At 4.7 GHz sitting at around 64-66C. Hopefully will be stable.

[Gojon17]

Nevermind... It crashed on realbench instantly lol

[bcguru9384]

7 hours ago, Gojon17 said:

So what you are saying is to change settings to allow more current?

 

no im saying that OC is really not worth the trouble

the moment you OC you effected the signaling patterns and will cause buffer overuns which will bsod

intel and amd spend how much money on research to these cpus and want to be the fastest

fact

if the cpu was meant to be stabil at over factory clock it would already be set to the faster rate