Who started the lie that ryzen has better minimums?Who is actually faking the results?

[Princess Luna]

People buying the i5 7600k on a Z270 Chipset + Aftermarket Cooling should feel bad regardless, paying extreme overprice for a bad product compared to the other offerings, Intel's offering even if you're so against Ryzen.

 

Get the i7 7700 on a h110m and be happy, just don't try to revive a processor configuration (4c/4t) that should be dead for ages now, the i5 6600k / 7600k both were terrible purchases, terrible value CPUs that only sold absurdly due to the endless misleading bad youtube reviews (in which those I'd actually believe there was some bribing going on lol).

 

Youtubers including Linus saying that for high end gaming you should get an i5, even when it's already choking a GTX 1070~980ti depending on the game, at the same expense (or even more expensive) as getting a much better locked i7.... but oh my all the cool kids overclock their CPUs even if the performance gain is actually minimum and there's NOTHING "free" about OC'ing Intel nowadays.

 

Frankly it upsets me the absurd amount of people who thought so hard about overclocking as if that is a must for good gaming performance and in the end of the day end up with inferior averages and minimums than people rocking i7 6700 ~ i7 7700 on h110 and b250 chipsets and stock cooling.

 

Ryzen at least makes sense, something Intel lost years ago, the 1600 is not only a more logical choice it should be the only choice until Intel finally goes 10nm, if Intel products sucks and are disappointing terrible value trash it's because of people like you that in plain 2017 tries to find some defending on outdated overpriced 4c/4t i5's