Jump to content

BenQ xl2410t

Or 

ACER XF240H

 

 

Was going to buy the ViewSonic but costs more than either of these screens.

 

The 120hz one is 140, the 144hz is 190.

MAD-BOX Ryzen 1600X - ASRock X370 Killer SLI - Sapphire R9 Fury NITRO+  -Fried it... RIP

Xeon e5640 4.35ghz, CoolerMaster Seidon 240V, ASUS P6X58D-E, DDR3 8GB 1636mhz CL9, Sapphire Fury Nitro OC+, 2x Stone age storage @ 7200RPM, Crucial 960GB SSD, NZXT S340, Silverstone Strider Gold Evolution, Steelseries RIVAL, Mechanical Metal keyboard, Boogie Bug Aimb mouse pad.

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/817140-120-vs-144hz/
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they both have/don't have gsync or freesynce they are gonna be the same. Unless you have the power to sync frames on games and want those extra frames. Same goes for response time.

Main RIg Lian Li O11 MINI, I7 9900k, ASUS ROG Maximus XI Hero, G.Skill Ripjaws 3600 32GB, 3090FE, EVGA 1000G5, Acer Nitro XZ3 2560 x 1440@240hz 

 

Spare RIg Lian Li O11 AIR MINI, I7 4790K, Asus Maximus VI Extreme, G.Skill Ares 2400 32Gb, EVGA 1080ti, 1080sc 1070sc & 1060 SSC, EVGA 850GA, Acer KG251Q 1920x1080@240hz 

 

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/817140-120-vs-144hz/#findComment-10247160
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Mick Naughty said:

If they both have/don't have gsync or freesynce they are gonna be the same. Unless you have the power to sync frames on games and want those extra frames. Same goes for response time.

The XF is FreeSync capable, as is the more expensive ViewSonic panel but the BenQ is the cheapest, and i'm more inclined to go for the cheaper option, only really want higher refresh for CS and FPS shooters and maybe some racing games. I use my SONY Bravia for everything else since it's a 12 bit IPS... way higher quality.

MAD-BOX Ryzen 1600X - ASRock X370 Killer SLI - Sapphire R9 Fury NITRO+  -Fried it... RIP

Xeon e5640 4.35ghz, CoolerMaster Seidon 240V, ASUS P6X58D-E, DDR3 8GB 1636mhz CL9, Sapphire Fury Nitro OC+, 2x Stone age storage @ 7200RPM, Crucial 960GB SSD, NZXT S340, Silverstone Strider Gold Evolution, Steelseries RIVAL, Mechanical Metal keyboard, Boogie Bug Aimb mouse pad.

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/817140-120-vs-144hz/#findComment-10247173
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Freesync seems worth it too me. Id spend the bit more since you have an amd card. Also better response time and refresh rate. Better overall.

5 minutes ago, Evolution90 said:

The XF is FreeSync capable, as is the more expensive ViewSonic panel but the BenQ is the cheapest, and i'm more inclined to go for the cheaper option, only really want higher refresh for CS and FPS shooters and maybe some racing games. I use my SONY Bravia for everything else since it's a 12 bit IPS... way higher quality.

 

Main RIg Lian Li O11 MINI, I7 9900k, ASUS ROG Maximus XI Hero, G.Skill Ripjaws 3600 32GB, 3090FE, EVGA 1000G5, Acer Nitro XZ3 2560 x 1440@240hz 

 

Spare RIg Lian Li O11 AIR MINI, I7 4790K, Asus Maximus VI Extreme, G.Skill Ares 2400 32Gb, EVGA 1080ti, 1080sc 1070sc & 1060 SSC, EVGA 850GA, Acer KG251Q 1920x1080@240hz 

 

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/817140-120-vs-144hz/#findComment-10247198
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I want to add extra FPS doesn't mean jack squat to some game categories like MOBAs. But for FPS' rotating the camera fast you will see obvious that the higher FPS is better. A lot of people also think that a higher FPS will make them play better because it is more fluid, but consider that moving your mouse the same distance between each monitor will still move the camera the same distance in game. Correlation between higher FPS and playing better is little to non-existent.

 

Before I get quoted, this is from 60FPS to 120FPS.

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/817140-120-vs-144hz/#findComment-10247278
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Evolution90 said:

BenQ xl2410t

Or 

ACER XF240H

 

 

Was going to buy the ViewSonic but costs more than either of these screens.

 

The 120hz one is 140, the 144hz is 190.

If screen tearing is a concern, get the one with the freesync, it will help you in the long run.

 

as for 120 vs 144hz afaik i can't tell the difference. they are both freaking fluid smooth af. whether your graphics can crank a solid 144 all the way [95%+] is your own evaluation... but it gives a slight more headroom for that extra frame rate goody.

CPU: Intel Core i7-7700K | Motherboard: ASUS ROG STRIX Z270H | Graphics Card: ASUS ROG STRIX GTX 1080 Ti OCEdition | RAM: 16GB G.Skill Ripjaws V 3000MHz |Storage: 1 x Samsung 830 EVO Series 250GB | 1 x Samsung 960 PRO Series 512GB | 1 x Western Digital Blue 1TB | 1 x Western Digital Blue 4TB | PSU: Corsair RM750x 750W 80+ Gold Power Supply | Case: Cooler Master MasterCase 5 Pro |

Cooling: Corsair H100i v2 // 4x Corsair ML140 RED Fans // 2x Corsair ML120 RED Fans 
---

Monitor: ASUS ROG Swift PG279Q 1440p 165Hz IPS G-Sync | Keyboard: Corsair K70 LUX Red LED, Cherry MX Brown Switches | Mouse: Corsair Glaive RGB | Speakers: Logitech Z623 THX Certified Speakers

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/817140-120-vs-144hz/#findComment-10247694
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×