Amd vs intel

[OMKAR PATADE]

Which is best for workstation pc 

[Matt_98]

2 minutes ago, OMKAR PATADE said:

Which is best for workstation pc 

intel, (release the fanboys!!!!!!!!!!!)

[Gonio]

If you only do Word and Minesweeper anything goes I would say..

[DocSwag]

Intel, though Ryzen is coming soon which you might want to consider. However, if you need Xeon processors AMD won't have their Ryzen based opterons out for a while.

[OMKAR PATADE]

1 minute ago, Gonio said:

If you only do Word and Minesweeper anything goes I would say..

I dont think someone builds workstation for Microsoft word and minesweeper  ?????it may crazy if anybody doez

[Guest]

Depends on how much you can spend 

[SCHISCHKA]

Define workstation because some people can do with an ARM system. It's pretty varied outside gaming. Amd fx performance in software compiling are almost as good as intel but half the price. Arm devices has good power consumption and some people can do their spreadsheets and docs on it. Intel were on almost all laptops but I see amd has squeezed itself somehow onto the budget ones.

before this thread gets locked due to the title here is an educational video 

 

[Nena Trinity]

AMD 8-core if you are on a budget but for higher end I guess a i7-6800K or Xeon?

[Ryujin2003]

As others have stated, what will you be doing? What are your requirements and what's your budget. And what is your definition if a workstation? If you're doing CAD, graphics design, or some other highly interested site task, Intel definitely. But I'd your definition of workstation is something that's portable for work, using primarily Microsoft Office, no need for dedicated graphics and on a tight budget, then either AMD or a low end Intel card (i3). It all depends on what you want and what your limitations are.

[ARikozuM]

Workstation is very vague. What are you working on?

[Nena Trinity]

42 minutes ago, Ryujin2003 said:

As others have stated, what will you be doing? What are your requirements and what's your budget. And what is your definition if a workstation? If you're doing CAD, graphics design, or some other highly interested site task, Intel definitely. But I'd your definition of workstation is something that's portable for work, using primarily Microsoft Office, no need for dedicated graphics and on a tight budget, then either AMD or a low end Intel card (i3). It all depends on what you want and what your limitations are.

I dunno I do not think i3 is good for a workstation when you can find a FX-8300 at that range, tough the newest Pentium G4560? Has same multi-core score as a Athlon X4 880K I say a FX-6300 probably is a good chip to!

[Quaker]

Intel at the moment, but Ryzen may change that.

 

For a "home" semi-pro workstation, I'd suggest an i7-7700K if you want to build it right now.